Analysis of Labor-Management Negotiation based on Chicken Evolutionary Game and Catastrophe Theory

محورهای موضوعی : Game Theory

ahmad makui ¹ (School of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran)
Seyed Mohammad Seyedhosseini ² (School of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran)
Parinaz Esmaeili ³ (School of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran)
Seyed Jafar Sadjadi ⁴ (School of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran)

تاریخ دریافت : 1398/12/27 تاریخ پذیرش : 1399/10/20 تاریخ انتشار : 1399/09/11

کلید واژه: labor-management negotiation, evolutionary chicken game, catastrophe theory,

چکیده مقاله :

This paper aims to conduct a research on the labor-management negotiation in chicken evolutionary game models through catastrophe theory. The both players can compromise or not during the negotiation. The "no compromise" strategy for labor means threat to strike and for management is ignoring labors' demands. Since the model of this research is chicken game, if on player decides to dig in, the optimum decision for other is to compromise, however it is costly to be calling a chicken by the rivals. In the process of evolution, players reevaluate their options to update the payoffs in case of gradual and continuous changes which may happen in effective variables of strategy selection. The continuous changes could cause a catastrophic change in system’s state and its collapse by a strike or lockout. ESS analysis and determining catastrophe threshold in the chicken evolutionary game will be done with the aim of giving managerial insights that help the players to prevent making decisions that could cause unsuccessful negotiation.

منابع و مأخذ:

[1] Capdevielle, C. M. (1979). Phase II in the Experimental Evaluation of the Oliva/Capdevielle Cusp Catastrophe Model  ofCllective Bargaining, LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses.
3382.

[2] Chasek, P. (1997) A comparative analysis of multilateral environmental negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiaton, 6,437–461.

[3] Chen, S., Hao, J., Weiss, G., Tuyls, K., & Leung, H. F. (2014)Evaluating practical automated negotiation based on spatial evolutionary game theory. Joint German/Austrian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Künstliche Intelligenz). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8736, 147–158.

[4] Dimas, I. D., Rebelo, T., Lourenço, P. R., Rocha, H. (2018) A cusp catastrophe model for satisfaction, conflict, and conflict management in teams. International Conference on  Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10961, 335-350.

[5] Druckman, D. (1986) Stages, turning points, and crises: Negotiating military base rights, Spain, and the United States. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 327–360.

[6] Druckman, D. (2001) Turning points in international negotiation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45, 519–544.

[7] Esmaeili, A., Ghorrati, Z., Matson, E. (2018) Multi-agent Cooperation Using Snow-Drift Evolutionary Game Model: Case Study in Foraging Task. 2018 Second IEEE International
Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC), IEEE, 308-312.
[8] Hofbauer, J. (1998) Game Theory, Experience, Rationality. Springer, Dordrecht, 245-259.
[9] Hu, B., and Xia, N. (2015) Cusp catastrophe model for sudden changes in a person’s behavior. Information Sciences, 294, 489-512.
[10] Hu, B., Hu, X. (2018) Qualitative modeling of catastrophe in group opinion. Soft Computing, 22(14), 4661-4684.
[11] Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Minton, J. W. (1999) Negotiation. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, 1-30.
[12] Smith, J., Price, G. (1973) The Logic of Animal Conflict. Nature, 246, 15–18.
[13] Olekalns, M., Adair, W. L. (2013) Handbook of research on negotiation. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA, 332–356.
[14] Russell, B.W. (1959). Common Sense and Nuclear Warfare. George Allen and Unwin, London, 1-30.
[15] Smith, J.M. (1974) The theory of games and the evolution of a nimal conflicts. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 47(1), 209- 221.
[16] Taylor, P.D., Jonker, L.B. (1978) Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences, 40(1), 145-156.

[17] Thom, R., (1972) Structural Stability and Morphogenesis an Outline of a General Theory of Models. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 38-101.
[18] Wang, B., Wang, C., Song, Y. (2016) Fuzzy Catastrophe Model of Project Selection Based on Strategy. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and
Engineering Management, Atlantis Press, 117-127.
[19] Xu, Y., Bin, H., Wu, J., and Zhang. J. (2014) Nonlinear analysis of the cooperation of strategic alliances through stochastic catastrophe theory. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its
Applications, 400, 100–108.
[20] Zeeman, E.C. (1976) Catastrophe theory. Scientific American, 234 (4), 65–83