Poultry Industry Regional Innovation System Model
محورهای موضوعی : Strategic planningمژگان عبداللهی کلورزی 1 , سعید باقرسلیمی 2 , علیرضا صیداوی 3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد رشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رشت، ایران
2 - استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد رشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رشت، ایران
3 - استاد، گروه علوم دامی، واحد رشت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رشت، ایران
کلید واژه: Regional Innovation System, Structural-Functional Approach, Poultry Industry,
چکیده مقاله :
The poultry industry is one of the most important economic resources, having one of the most voluminous parts of human resources.Its scope and the growing consumption of related products have raised the need for innovation in it.This study aimed to provide a poultry industry regional innovation system model, with a pilot study on three provinces of Guilan, Mazandaran,and Golestan in Iran.This was a pluralistic, applied, descriptive survey with quantitative - qualitative data.The statistical population included Iranian experts in the poultry industry.In addition to using library resources, questionnaires and interviews were also used to collect data.The snowball sampling was used to select experts.Five experts were selected for interviews and 32 received questionnaires. Data were analyzed using SPSS and Modeler software, as well as the multi-layer perceptron artificial neural network. This study employed the Functional-Structural Analysis approach to provide apoultry industry regional innovation system model. Overall, 15 actors, 29 institutions and six functions were identified. Data analysis confirmed the model. The findings showed that the most important indices of structural elements were Islamic Republic of Iran Customs Administration (IRICA) among regional innovation system actors, and implementing policies to attract domestic technology and international capital among regional innovation system institutions.In addition, the results showed that all the functions of the innovation system were of great importance, among which only the innovation and entrepreneurship indices had a relatively lower performance, which requires policymakers to take measures to improve them.
صنعت طیور با داشتن یکی از پر حجم‌ترین بخشهای نیروی انسانی از مهمترین منابع اقتصادی است. وسعت این صنعت و روند رو‌به‌رشد مصرف محصولات مرتبط با آن لزوم توجه به نوآوری دراین صنعت را موجب شده است. هدف این پژوهش ارائه الگوی نظام نوآوری منطقه‌ای صنعت طیور بود که سه استان گیلان، مازندران و گلستان در کشور ایران بصورت نمونه مورد مطالعه قرارگرفتند. پژوهش حاضر ازمنظر ماهیت، پژوهشی کاربردی، ازمنظر روش از نوع توصیفی–پیمایشی، ازمنظر نوع داده کمی- کیفی و ازلحاظ فلسفه پژوهش از نوع کثرت‌گرایی بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش خبرگان مرتبط با صنعت طیور در کشور بودند. جهت جمع‌آوری داده‌ها علاوه‌بر استفاده از منابع کتابخانه‌ای، از ابزار پرسشنامه و مصاحبه استفاده گردید. در این پژوهش برای انتخاب خبرگان از روش تکنیک گلوله‌برفی استفاده شد. برای انجام مصاحبه‌ها 5نفر از خبرگان انتخاب شدند و پرسشنامه‌ها نیز بین 32نفر از خبرگان توزیع شد. تجزیه‌و‌تحلیل داده‌ها نیز با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SPSS و Modeler و همچنین رویکرد شبکه عصبی مصنوعی پرسپترون چندلایه انجام گردید. دراین پژوهش از رویکرد ساختاری–کارکردی برای ارائه الگوی نظام نوآوری منطقه‌ای صنعت طیور استفاده شد. درمجموع 15بازیگر، 29نهاد و 6کارکرد شناسایی شد که تحلیل داده‌ها مدل را مورد تایید قرارداد. همچنین یافته‌ها نشان داد که دربین بازیگران نظام نوآوری منطقه‌ای سازمان گمرک و دربین نهادهای نظام نوآوری منطقه‌ای اجرای سیاست‌های مربوط به کمک به جذب دانش فنی و سرمایه‌های داخلی و بین‌المللی مهمترین شاخصهای عناصر ساختاری بودند. ازطرفی نتایج نشان داد که تمامی کارکردهای نظام نوآوری دارای اهمیت بالایی بوده و در بین آنها فقط شاخصهای کارکرد نوآوری و کارآفرینی دارای عملکرد نسبتاً پایینتری بودند که لازم است تا سیاستگذاران اقدامات لازم برای بهبود عملکرد این کارکرد را مورد توجه قرار دهند.
Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Licht, G. (2016). National systems of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 46 (4), 527-535.
Agriculture Jihad Organization,2018. http://www.isaarojahad.maj.ir/
Amankwah, K., Klerkx, L., Oosting, S. J., Sakyi-Dawson, O., Van der Zijpp, A. J., & Millar, D. (2012). Diagnosing constraints to market participation of small ruminant producers in northern Ghana: An innovation systems analysis. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 60, 37-47.
Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43 (7), 1097-1108.
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., &Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37 (3), 407-429.
Berthinier-Poncet, A. (2013). Cluster governance and institutional dynamics A comparative analysis of French regional clusters of innovation. In Economics and Management of Networks Conference (EMNet28 May) (pp. 21-23).
Block, F., & Keller, M. R. (2009). Where do innovations come from? Transformations in the US economy, 1970–2006. Socio-Economic Review, 7(3), 459-483.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D. The economic journal, 99(397), 569-596.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1994). Fortune favors the prepared firm. Management science, 40(2), 227-251.
Coriat, B., & Weinstein, O. (2002). Organizations, firms and institutions in the generation of innovation. Research Policy, 31 (2), 273-290.
Crescenzi, R., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2011). Knowledge Flows and Their Spatial Extent. In Innovation and Regional Growth in the European Union (pp. 75-82). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
Criaco, G., Minola, T., Migliorini, P., &Serarols-Tarrés, C. (2014). “To have and have not”: founders’ human capital and university start-up survival. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39 (4), 567-593.
Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in society, 24(3), 243-263.
Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations. Routledge, UK.
Etzkowitz, H., &Ranga, M. (2015). Triple Helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the Knowledge Society. In Entrepreneurship and knowledge exchange (pp. 117-158). Routledge, UK.
Flatten, T. C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S. A., &Brettel, M. (2011). A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. European Management Journal, 29 (2), 98-116.
Galli, R., & Teubal, M. (1997). Paradigmatic shifts in national innovation systems. Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations, Routledge, UK.342-370.
Gao, S., & Van Lente, H. (2008). Comparing approaches to systems of innovation: Confronting to the Chinese telecommunication sector. The 5th international PHD school on ‘national systems of innovation and economic development. 1-17. Georgia Institute of Technology.
Guerreiro, J., & Pinto, H. (2012). The engaged university and institutional changes in Portuguese innovation systems. International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems, 2 (1), 72-90.
Guo, W. (2010, May). An exploring study on Regional Innovation System. In 2010 Chinese Control and Decision Conference (pp. 4026-4030). IEEE.
Gust-Bardon, N. I. (2015). The structural and functional analysis of innovation systems: outline of the Polish case. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 6 (1), 31-60.
Haddad, C. R., & Maldonado, M. U. (2017). A functions approach to improve sectoral technology roadmaps. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 115, 251-260.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., &Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.
Hall, A., Janssen, W., Pehu, E., & Rajalahti, R. (2006). Enhancing Agricultural Innovation: How to Go beyond the Strengthening of Research Systems. Agriculture and Rural Development. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
Hellsmark, H., Mossberg, J., Söderholm, P., &Frishammar, J. (2016). Innovation system strengths and weaknesses in progressing sustainable technology: the case of Swedish biorefinery development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 702-715.
Hermans, F., Geerling-Eiff, F., Potters, J., &Klerkx, L. (2019). Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instruments–Assessing their contribution to innovation system function dynamics. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 88, 76-95.
Hermans, F., Klerkx, L., &Roep, D. (2015). Structural conditions for collaboration and learning in innovation networks: using an innovation system performance lens to analyse agricultural knowledge systems. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 21 (1), 35-54.
Hounkonnou, D., Kossou, D., Kuyper, T. W., Leeuwis, C., Nederlof, E. S., Röling, N., ... & van Huis, A. (2012). An innovation systems approach to institutional change: smallholder development in West Africa. Agricultural Systems, 108, 74-83.
FAO STAT, 2019. http://www.fao.org/home/en/
Foss, N. J., Husted, K., & Michailova, S. (2010). Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis, governance mechanisms, and research directions. Journal of Management studies, 47(3), 455-482.
Isaksen, A., &Trippl, M. (2017). Innovation in space: the mosaic of regional innovation patterns. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33 (1), 122-140.
Jin, B. H., Wu, C. Y., & Huang, C. J. (2015). Transactive memory systems: a catalyst for the cooperation of industries, universities and research institutions in regional innovation systems. International Business Research, 8 (1), 163-172.
Kebebe, E., Duncan, A. J., Klerkx, L., De Boer, I. J. M., &Oosting, S. J. (2015). Understanding socio-economic and policy constraints to dairy development in Ethiopia: A coupled functional-structural innovation systems analysis. Agricultural Systems, 141, 69-78.
Klerkx, L., & Nettle, R. (2013). Achievements and challenges of innovation co-production support initiatives in the Australian and Dutch dairy sectors: a comparative study. Food Policy, 40, 74-89.
Klerkx, L., Van Mierlo, B., &Leeuwis, C. (2012). Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: concepts, analysis and interventions. In Farming Systems Research into the 21st century: The new dynamic (pp. 457-483). Springer, Dordrecht.
Knickel, K., Brunori, G., Rand, S., &Proost, J. (2009). Towards a better conceptual framework for innovation processes in agriculture and rural development: from linear models to systemic approaches. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 15 (2), 131-146.
Lamprinopoulou, C., Renwick, A., Klerkx, L., Hermans, F., &Roep, D. (2014). Application of an integrated systemic framework for analysing agricultural innovation systems and informing innovation policies: Comparing the Dutch and Scottish agrifood sectors. Agricultural Systems, 129, 40-54.
Leyden, D. P. (2016). Public-sector entrepreneurship and the creation of a sustainable innovative economy. Small Business Economics, 46 (4), 553-564.
Lundvall, B. Å. (2005). National innovation systems-Analytical concept and development tool. DRUID Tenth Anniversary Summer Conference 2005 on Dynamics of Industry and Innovation: Organizations. Networks and Systems. Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maghable, R., Naderi, K., Yaghoobi, A., &Mohammadi, M. (2017). Investigating the functional implications of nano-technological innovation system in the agricultural sector of Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 47 (4), 943-959.
MeigoonPouri, M.R., Motevaseli, M, &MeigoonPouri, E. (2014). Identifying the Factors Influencing Technological Innovation System in the Field of Renewable Energy. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 6 (4), 169-184.
Mian, S., Lamine, W., &Fayolle, A. (2016). Technology Business Incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge. Technovation, 50, 1-12.
Mikhaylova, A. A. (2015). Spatial perspective on regional innovation system. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (3 S5), 27.
Minh, T. T. (2019). Unpacking the systemic problems and blocking mechanisms of a regional agricultural innovation system: An integrated regional-functional-structural analysis. Agricultural Systems, 173, 268-280.
Mofakkarul Islam, M., Renwick, A., Lamprinopoulou, C., &Klerkx, L. (2013). Innovation in livestock genetic improvement. EuroChoices, 12 (1), 42-47.
Mohammadi, M., Manteghi, M., Elyasi, M., Saberfard, A., &Saadabadi,A. (2016). The Identify for Public Competencies Contributing to the Enhancement of Technological Knowledge’s Absorption Capacity in the Iran’s Advanced Industry Defense; Case Study: The Space Industry. Defense Strategy, 14 (3), 155-193.
Momeni, F., &Alizadeh, P. (2014). Analysis of the barriers for innovation policy-making effectiveness in Iran: An Institutional Approach. Applied Economics Studies in Iran, 2 (8), 73-89.
Muscio, A., Reid, A., & Rivera Leon, L. (2015). An empirical test of the regional innovation paradox: Can smart specialisation overcome the paradox in Central and Eastern Europe? Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 18 (2), 153-171.
Negro, S. O., Hekkert, M. P., & Smits, R. E. (2007). Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion—a functional analysis. Energy policy, 35 (2), 925-938.
Norouzi, E., Tabatabaeeian, S.H., &Ghazinoori, S.S. (2016). Assessing the effect of intermediary institutions in addressing the weaknesses of the NIS functions of Iran. Journal of Science & Technology Policy, 8 (1), 15-26.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge university press.
OECD. (2009). OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation OECD Reviews of Regional Innovation: Piedmont, Italy, OECD.
Ortiz, O., Orrego, R., Pradel, W., Gildemacher, P., Castillo, R., Otiniano, R., ... &Damene, B. (2013). Insights into potato innovation systems in Bolivia, Ethiopia, Peru and Uganda. Agricultural Systems, 114, 73-83.
Oughton, C., Landabaso, M., & Morgan, K. (2002). The regional innovation paradox: innovation policy and industrial policy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27 (1), 97-110.
Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B. (2017). Learning to compete in African industry: Institutions and technology in development. Routledge, UK.
Perez Vico, E. (2013). The impact of academia on the dynamics of innovation systems: Capturing and explaining utilities from academic R&D. Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.
Sanchez, G. (2013). PLS path modeling with R. Berkeley: Trowchez Editions, 383.
Schut, M., Rodenburg, J., Klerkx, L., Kayeke, J., van Ast, A., &Bastiaans, L. (2015). RAAIS: Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (Part II). Integrated analysis of parasitic weed problems in rice in Tanzania. Agricultural Systems, 132, 12-24.
Shu, C., Zhou, K. Z., Xiao, Y., & Gao, S. (2016). How green management influences product innovation in China: The role of institutional benefits. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(3), 471-485.
Suurs, R. A., Hekkert, M. P., Kieboom, S., & Smits, R. E. (2010). Understanding the formative stage of technological innovation system development: The case of natural gas as an automotive fuel. Energy Policy, 38 (1), 419-431.
Temel, T., Janssen, W. G., &Karimov, F. (2002). The Agricultural Innovation System of Azerbaijan: An Assessment of Institutional Linkages. ISNAR, International Service for National Agricultural Research, Netherlands.
Totin, E., Van Mierlo, B., Saïdou, A., Mongbo, R., Agbossou, E., Stroosnijder, L., &Leeuwis, C. (2012). Barriers and opportunities for innovation in rice production in the inland valleys of Benin. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 60, 57-66.
Trunina, A., Liu, X., & Chen, J. (2019). Small and medium technology enterprises in Zhongguancun and Silicon Valley: Regional innovation system approach. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management.10(1), 35-57
Turner, J. A., Klerkx, L., Rijswijk, K., Williams, T., & Barnard, T. (2016). Systemic problems affecting co-innovation in the New Zealand Agricultural Innovation System: Identification of blocking mechanisms and underlying institutional logics. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 76, 99-112.
Turner, J. A., Rijswijk, K., Williams, T., Barnard, T., &Klerkx, L. (2013). Challenges to effective interaction in the New Zealand agricultural research and extension system: an innovation systems analysis. Extension Farming Systems Journal, 9 (1), 89-98.
VanAlphen, K., Van Ruijven, J., Kasa, S., Hekkert, M., &Turkenburg, W. (2009). The performance of the Norwegian carbon dioxide, capture and storage innovation system. Energy Policy, 37 (1), 43-55.
Vargo, S. L., Wieland, H., & Akaka, M. A. (2015). Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 44, 63-72.
Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J., & Lyles, M. A. (2010). Perspective- Absorbing the concept of absorptive capacity: How to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science, 21 (4), 931-951.
Wang, Y., Roijakkers, N., &Vanhaverbeke, W. (2011). Linking open innovation to national systems of innovation: a coevolutionary perspective. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 3 (5), 446-464.
Wieczorek, A. J., &Hekkert, M. P. (2012). Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. Science and Public Policy, 39 (1), 74-87.
Wieczorek, A. J., Hekkert, M. P., Coenen, L., &Harmsen, R. (2015). Broadening the national focus in technological innovation system analysis: The case of offshore wind. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 14, 128-148.
Wieczorek, A. J., Negro, S. O., Harmsen, R., Heimeriks, G. J., Luo, L., &Hekkert, M. P. (2013). A review of the European offshore wind innovation system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, 294-306.
Zhao, S. L., Cacciolatti, L., Lee, S. H., & Song, W. (2015). Regional collaborations and indigenous innovation capabilities in China: A multivariate method for the analysis of regional innovation systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 202-220.
