Comparison of Educational Efficiency Using the Bybee Model and the Combined Teaching Method on Academic Achievement and Social Responsibility of Student Teachers

Subject Areas : Education

zahra sarchahani ¹ , Zhila Hidari Naghdali ² , Mojtaba sarchahani ³

1 - Department of Educational Sciences،Shahid Rajaei Campus, Farhangian University, Shiraz, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor of Curriculum Studies, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Shiraz, Iran
3 - Ph.D student in Curriculum Planning, Educational Guide, Neyriz Education Department, Iran

Received: 2021-05-08 Accepted : 2022-01-25 Published : 2021-06-22

Keywords: Academic Achievement, the Bybee teaching method, combined teaching method, student teachers, Social Responsibility,

Abstract :

   The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficiency of Bybee five-step teaching method and the combined teaching method on academic achievement and social responsibility of students at Farhangian University. The research method was quasi-experimental. A pretest-post-test design was used for two groups. The statistical population was all students of Farhangian University of Fars province. A total of 34 students were selected through multi-stage cluster random sampling and randomly divided into two groups (each group included 17 people). One group was trained with the combined teaching method and the other group was trained with Bybee method in eight 90-minute sessions during eight weeks. For collecting data, the Social Responsibility Questionnaire of Qalavandi & et al. (2014) and the researcher-made academic achievement test were used. Validity of social responsibility questionnaire was assessed using content validity and its reliability was calculated by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.859). The validity of the test of academic achievement was confirmed by content validity. To determine its reliability, the Kuder-Richardson formula was used and its value was 0.78. Descriptive statistics and covariance analysis were used to analyze the data. The findings indicated that the level of academic achievement and social responsibility of students who were trained with the Bybee method (5E) was significantly more than those who were trained with the combined teaching method. Compared to the combined method, using the Bybee method increases students' responsibility and academic achievement.

References:

References

- Abdoli, S., Abadi, A., Moradi, Kh., & Mehrvarz, M. (2015). Comparison the Impact of Bybee and Gagne Learning Method on Students' Motivation and Learning, Journal of Research in Curriculum Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, Spring and Summer, 2015, pp. 25- 46. [in Persian]

- Açişli, S., Yalçin, S. A., & Turgut, Ü. (2011). An evaluation of activities designed in accordance with the 5E model by would-be science teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 708-711.

- Afsari, A. Ozma, M. Shahsavari, S. & Gholami, N. (2019). Evaluation of instructional design models Bybee (5E( learning the English language. Quarterly Journal of Education Studies, Volume 5, Issue 19, pp: 1-9. [in Persian]

- Aghazadeh, M. (2011). Educational technology (based on the constructivist approach). Published by: Aij, Tehran 2011 [in Persian].

- Akgunduz, D., & Akinoglu, O. (2016). The Effect of Blended Learning and Social Media-Supported Learning on the Students' Attitude and Self-Directed Learning Skills in Science Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 15(2), 106-115.

- Azizi, H., Norouzi, D., & Zarei Zavaraki, I. (2015). Bibi teaching method in the amount of learning and motivation of students' academic achievement. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning, Year 3 - Number 5, pp. 53-39. [in Persian]

- Bybee.R. W. (2009). The BSCS 5e instructional model and 21ST century skills. Retrieved March 10, 2009from :www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Bybee_21st%20Century_Paper.pdf.

- Çetin, A., & Özdemir, Ö. F. (2018). Mode-Method Interaction: The Role of Teaching Methods on The Effect of Instructional Modes on Achievements, Science Process Skills, and Attitudes Towards Physics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(5), 1815-1826.

- Davis, K,D., Winsler, A., Middleton, M. (2006). Students' perceptions of rewards for academic performance by parents and teachers: Relations with achievement and motivation in college. J Genet Psychol. 2006;167(2):211-20.

- Fardanash, H. (2010). Theoretical Foundations of Educational Technology, Tehran: Samt. [in Persian]

- Fazlollahi Ghomshi, S. (2015). Student responsibility; Influencing factors and priorities. Culture in The Islamic University, 2015 (Fall) 16, Vol. 5 , No.3, pp: 327-346. [in Persian]

- Ford, M. (1985). social Cognition and social Competence in adolesece. development psychology،Vo.18،Pp.323-340.

- Ghalavandi, H., Kabiri, A., & Sultanzadeh, V. (2014). The relationship between social responsibility and teamwork of Urmia University staff. Applied Sociology (Journal of Humanities Research, University of Isfahan), 25 (1 (consecutive 53)), 111-120. [in Persian]

- Hassana, R. A., & Woodcock, A. (2018). Blended learning: Issues and Concerns.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228944257_Blended_learning_Issues_and_Concerns

- Heidarei, H. (2006). The Effect of Two Teaching Methods in Evaluating the Academic Achievement of 5th Grade Students in Empirical Sciences in Ghaemshahr City in the Year of Academic Year 84-83, Master's Thesis Not Published, Allameh Tabatabai University. [in Persian]

- Jahedi, R., Gargari, R B., & Mahmudi, F. (2019). The effect of Baybi educational design model on the creativity of sixth grade students.Journal of initiative and creativity in the humanities, Ninth Volume, Number Two, Fall 98, p: 1-22. [in Persian]

- Johnson, S.D., Aragon S.R., & Shaik, N. (2000). Comparative Analysis of Learner Satisfaction and Learning Outcomes in Online and Face-to-Face. Learning Environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research ( ; 11(1): 29

- Kalantarnia, Z., Shahvarani Semnani, A., Behzadi, M.H., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M., & Mardanbeigi, M.R. (2020). The effect of educational interventions based on synectics and 5E patterns on students' academic performance in geometry. Tech. Edu. J. 14(4): 835-846. [in Persian]

- Keramati, M. R. (2006). Collaborative Learning: Learning Through Collaboration. Tehran: Faraangizesh. [in Persian]

- Khoftehdel, M, Adibnia, A, & Mohajer, Y. (2015). The comparison of the effect of cooperative teaching method and E5 teaching method on academic achievement and social skills: considering the fifth grade male elementary school students in empirical science course. Curriculum Research, Volume 12, Number 46, Fall and Winter 2015, pp. 90-103. [in Persian]

- Maleki, M. (2011). the effect of Gagne and Bybee’s educational design model in network-based learning on learning, memory, and motivation of students. Master's Thesis, Allameh Tabataba'i University. [in Persian]

- Mehdi Zade, A., Firozabadi, P. S., Mohamadi, H., Sharifi Najafabadi, A., Mohamadi, F., & Mansori, M. (2018). The effectiveness of baby education method on students' academic achievement motivation. Journal of Educational Research, Volume 5, Issue 19, pp: 1-9. [in Persian]

- Moradi, M. (2013). Comparison the Impact of Bybee and tradirional Learning Method on Students' Creativity and Learning. Master's Thesis, Allameh Tabataba'i University. [in Persian]

- Najafi, H. (2019). Comparing of the effect of Blended and Traditional teaching on Learning. Research in Medical Education / Summer 2019, 11 (2). [in Persian]

- Neo, M., & Neo, T. (2010). Students' Perceptions in Developing a Multimedia Project within a Constructivist Learning Environment: A Malaysian Experience. Turkish Online Journal of  Educational Technology.9.1. 176- 184.

- Razavi, A. (2012). New Topics in Educational Technology. Ahvaz: Ahwaz University Press. [in Persian]

- Runisah, R., Herman, T., & Dahlan, J. A. (2017). Using the 5E learning cycle with metacognitive technique to enhance students’ mathematical critical thinking skills. International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(1), 87-98.

- Salehi Imran, I., & Salari, Z. (2012). Combined learning; A new approach in the development of education and the teaching / learning process. Journal of Educational Strategies in Medical Sciences. 2012; 5 (1): 69-75 [in Persian]

- Sarchahani, Z. & Jokar, M. (2018). Assessing the social responsibility of Fars Farhangian University students. Fourth National Conference on Teacher Training, Kharazmi University of Tehran. [in Persian]

- Soares, A.P., Guisande, A.M., Almeida, L.S., & Paramo, F.M. (2009). Academic achievement in first-year Portuguese college students: The role of academic preparation and learning strategies. Int J Psychol. 2009;44(3):204-12.

- Sobhani Nejad, M., & Fardanash, H. (2000). Social Responsibility in the Current Curriculum of Iran's Elementary School, Modarres Quarterly, Volume 4, Issue 1, Spring 2000. [in Persian]

- Wang, T. (2015). Education benefit of multi medical skills .College Teaching 2015; 2 (20):70-85.

- Yazdanpanah, L., & Hekmat, F. (2014). Investigating the factors affecting the social responsibility of young people; (Study of students of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman). Social Studies of Iran: Summer 2014, Year 8 - Issue 2 Scientific-Research, from 150 to 127. [in Persian]

- Zarabian, F. (2018). The Study of Blended- Teaching Methods on Learning, Motivation and Interest in learning Anatomy Courses in Medical Students. Research in medical education, 10 (1), 63-71.[in Persian].