The European Union and the Syrian Crisis

Subject Areas : Iranian Political Research

Seyed Morteza Oreizi Maybodi ¹ ( University of Tehran )

Received: 2018-06-08 Accepted : 2018-08-10 Published : 2018-12-21

Keywords: Syria, European Union (EU), Moravcsik, Foreign policy, Liberal Intergovernmentalism,

Abstract :

In the 1950s, the European region made integration in the form of European community. Various views were presented by scholars, including Andrew Moravcsik who brought up the theory of “Liberal Intergovernmentalism” by examining the strengths and weaknesses of the European community. Since this theory, compared with other theories, shows the integration among European Union in a more practical way especially in the context of the common agricultural policy, the present study examines the common foreign and security policy of the European Union towards the Syrian crisis based on this theory. The present study’s research method is library research and descriptive correlational research. The hypothesis of the article is that the common foreign and security policy of the European Union has not been met due to the different behavior of the main actors of the European Union (UK, Germany, and France) over the Syrian crisis. The results of this research show that considering the assumptions of identifying states as the main actors of integration and rationalizing their behavior, the theory of “Liberal Intergovernmentalism”, in contrast to other similar theories, has a more realistic view of European integration. In this theory, integration between governments was examined in three stages of identification of national preferences, bargaining between governments, and institutional selection, among which integrated institutions and the common foreign and security policy of the European Union after the Maastricht Treaty was of great importance among the integrated institutions.

References:

1.    دهقانی ‌فیروزآبادی، سید جلال (1393). نظریه‌های همگرایی منطقه ای و رژیم‌های بین‌المللی. تهران: نشر مخاطب.
2.    قوام، سید عبدالعلی، و کیانی، داود (1390). اتحادیه اروپا: هویت، امنیت و سیاست. تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.
3.    مجیدی، محمد‌رضا، و نورعلی‌وند، یاسر (1393). موانع و چالش‌های تحقق سیاست خارجی و امنیتی مشترک اتحادیه اروپا. سازمان‌های بین‌المللی، 2(7)، 86-61.
4.    واعظی، محمود، و ایزدی، پیروز (1387). سیاست‌خارجی و امنیتی مشترک اروپا. پژوهش 18. تهران: پژوهشکده تحقیقات استراتژیک.
5.    Bache, I., & George, S. (2006). Politics in the European Union. UK: Oxford University Press.
6.    Bagdonas,A. (2012). The CFSP in synergetic theorizing: Explaining the CFSP via a multi-causal and multi-level analytical model. Strategic Comments, 2(5), 55-77.
7.    Council of the EU. (2015). Council conclusions on the EU regional strategy for Syria and Iraq as well as the ISIL/Da'esh threat, Retrieved June 10, 2018 from: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2015/03/16/council-conclusions-eu-regional-strategy-for-syria-and-iraq-as-well-as-the-isil-daesh-threat/pdf
8.    Council of the EU. (2015). Syria: EU extends sanctions against the regime by one year, Retrieved June 10, 2018 from: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2018/05/28/syria-eu-extends-sanctions-against-the-regime-by-one-year/pdf
9.    Council of the European Union. (2005). Presidency Conclusions, Brussels European Council, 15-16 December 2005, 1-24. Retrieved June 10, 2018 from: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/89013.pdf
10.    Council of the European Union. (2018). General Secretariat of the Council, Luxembourg European Council, 16 April 2018, 1-11. Retrieved June 10, 2018 from: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/89013.pdf
11.    Delegation of the European Union to Syria. (2009). European-Syrian Cooperation Agreement, Retrieved June 10, 2018 from: http://collections.internetmemory.org/haeu/content/20160313172652/http:/eeas.europa.eu/delegations/syria/eu_syria/political_relations/agreements/index_en.htm.
12.    Dostal, J., & Zorob, A. (2013). Syria and the Mediterranean Partnership. Syria Studies, 1(2), 1-79.
13.    Kim, M. (2014). Integration theory and ASEAN integration. Pacific Focus, 29(3), 374-394.
14.    Koremenos, B., Lipson, C., & Snidal, D. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761-799.
15.    Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist approach. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4), 473-524.
16.    Moravcsik, A. (2013). The Choice for Europe. London: Taylor and Francis.
17.    Moravcsik, A., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2009). Liberal intergovernmentalism. In a European integration theory (pp. 67-90). UK: Oxford University Press.
18.    Moravcsik,A , Vachudova, M.A. (2002). Bargaining among unequal’s: Enlargement and the future of European integration. EUSA Review, 15(4), Fall 2002.
19.    Rosamond, B. (2010). Theories of European integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.    Seeberg, P. (2016). EU Policies in the Mashreq: Between integration and security partnership. Middle East Policy, 23(4), 103-113.
21.    Smith, M. E. (2004). Europe’s foreign and security policy. The Institutionalization of cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
22.    Wilga, M. (2006) Poland and the other candidate countries: Influencing the treaty from the sidelines. In Laursen, Finn (Ed.) The Treaty of Nice. Actor Preferences, Bargaining and Institutional Choice, Leiden, Boston, Constitutional Law Library, Brill, Martinus Hijhoff Publishers, 323-48.
23.    Wilga, M. (2008). The CFSP in synergetic theorizing: Explaining the CFSP via a multi-causal and multi-level analytical model. Jean Monnet/Robert Schuman Paper Series, 8(7), 1-22.

_||_