Presenting a suitable model for the provision of housing for the martyr community from the perspective of housing sustainability indicators - a case study of the Nasirshahr Project of the Martyr Foundation and the Affairs of the Martyrs

Subject Areas : Geography and Urban Planning

Mohsen Ghasempour Shalmani ¹ , Hossein Dehghani podeh ²

1 - PhD student in Geography and Urban Planning, Azad University, Science and Research Branch
2 - Associate Professor of Malek Ashtar

Received: 2024-04-28 Accepted : 2024-06-11 Published : 2024-01-19

Keywords: : indicators of housing sustainability, community housing, housing supply, urban planning, management,

Abstract :

Housing as a shelter for residents' immunity, peace, health and vitality is the best way of investment and an integral element of the people's economy, which causes family stability and solidarity, reducing problems such as delinquency, divorce, social disintegration, street sleeping, slum living and begging. So much so that the right to have a suitable housing is included as part of the right to standard of living in many international human rights documents. The increasing growth of urbanization has created new and special problems in people's lives and relationships. One of the major problems is housing. The cities of the developing countries are facing unfavorable conditions from the point of view of urban planning, so that Hall and Pfeifer describe its perspective by posing a question, whether in the cities of the developing world, approaches of Urban planning was achieved and through it there was hope to increase the income and improve the environmental conditions of all citizens? According to the presented materials, the general purpose of the research is to provide a suitable model of providing housing for the sacrifice society from the perspective of housing sustainability indicators (case study: Nasirshahr Project of the Martyrs Foundation and Affairs). The aspect of being new and innovative in the research in terms of providing a suitable housing supply model for the self-sacrificing society, which is a new discussion and strategy emphasized by the governor of the province, also in terms of the lack of specific research obstacles with this research method in terms of providing a housing supply model It is considered suitable for the self-sacrificing society as a new research and the special innovation is to provide a suitable model for providing housing for the self-sacrificing society at the level of the country

References:

[1] Mashizi AK, Sharafatmandrad M. Investigating tradeoffs between supply, use and demand of ecosystem services and their effective drivers for sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021 Jul 1;289:112534.
[2] Elmallah S, Reames TG, Spurlock CA. Frontlining energy justice: Visioning principles for energy transitions from community-based organizations in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science. 2022 Dec 1;94:102855.
[3] Wang Z, Xu M, Lin H, Qureshi S, Cao A, Ma Y. Understanding the dynamics and factors affecting cultural ecosystem services during urbanization through spatial pattern analysis and a mixed-methods approach. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021 Jan 10;279:123422.
[4] Nzau B, Trillo C. Affordable housing provision in informal settlements through land value capture and inclusionary housing. Sustainability. 2020 Jul 24;12(15):5975.
[5] Kim J, Woo A, Cho GH. Is shared housing a viable economic and social housing option for young adults?: Willingness to pay for shared housing in Seoul. Cities. 2020 Jul 1;102:102732.
[6] Bohnenberger K. Can ‘Sufficiency’reconcile social and environmental goals? A Q-methodological analysis of German housing policy. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 2021 Mar;36(1):171-89.
[7] Shah IA, Csordas T, Akram U, Yadav A, Rasool H. Multifaceted role of job embeddedness within organizations: development of sustainable approach to reducing turnover intention. Sage Open. 2020 Jun;10(2):2158244020934876.
[8] Galster G, Lee KO. Housing affordability: A framing, synthesis of research and policy, and future directions. International Journal of Urban Sciences. 2021 Jan 1;25(sup1):7-58.
[9] Donaghy TQ, Healy N, Jiang CY, Battle CP. Fossil fuel racism in the United States: How phasing out coal, oil, and gas can protect communities. Energy Research & Social Science. 2023 Jun 1;100:103104.
[10] van Langen SK, Vassillo C, Ghisellini P, Restaino D, Passaro R, Ulgiati S. Promoting circular economy transition: A study about perceptions and awareness by different stakeholders groups. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021 Sep 20;316:128166.
[11] Sameer YM, Elmassah S, Mertzanis C, El-Maghraby L. Are happier nations more responsible? Examining the link between happiness and sustainability. Social Indicators Research. 2021 Nov;158(1):267-95.
[12] Kowalski KB, Aruldoss A, Gurumurthy B, Parayitam S. Work-from-home productivity and job satisfaction: a double-layered moderated mediation model. Sustainability. 2022 Sep 7;14(18):11179.
[13] Rakotonarivo OS, Jones IL, Bell A, Duthie AB, Cusack J, Minderman J, Hogan J, Hodgson I, Bunnefeld N. Experimental evidence for conservation conflict interventions: The importance of financial payments, community trust and equity attitudes. People and Nature. 2021 Feb;3(1):162-75.
[14] Ferreri M, Vidal L. Public-cooperative policy mechanisms for housing commons. International Journal of Housing Policy. 2022 Apr 3;22(2):149-73.
[15] Lanaj K, Gabriel AS, Chawla N. The self-sacrificial nature of leader identity: Understanding the costs and benefits at work and home. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2021 Mar;106(3):345.
[16] Agarwal S, Ramadani V, Dana LP, Agrawal V, Dixit JK. Assessment of the significance of factors affecting the growth of women entrepreneurs: study based on experience categorization. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. 2022 Jan 5;14(1):111-36.
[17] Sun Y, Shao Y. Measuring visitor satisfaction toward peri-urban green and open spaces based on social media data. Urban forestry & urban greening. 2020 Aug 1;53:126709.
[18] Mukisa N, Zamora R, Lie TT. Assessment of community sustainable livelihoods capitals for the implementation of alternative energy technologies in Uganda–Africa. Renewable energy. 2020 Nov 1;160:886-902.
[19] Selzer S. Car-reduced neighborhoods as blueprints for the transition toward an environmentally friendly urban transport system? A comparison of narratives and mobility-related practices in two case studies. Journal of transport geography. 2021 Oct 1;96:103126.
[20] Cheng L, Cheng L. Factors affecting farmers’ satisfaction with contemporary China’s land allocation policy—The Link Policy: Based on the empirical research of Ezhou. Contemporary China’s Land Use Policy: The Link Policy. 2021:117-42.
[21] Zain AF, Pribadi DO, Indraprahasta GS. Revisiting the green city concept in the tropical and global south cities context: The case of Indonesia. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2022 Feb 14;10:787204.
[22] Liu J, Bengtsson B, Bohman H, Staffansson Pauli K. A system model and an innovation approach toward sustainable housing renovation. Sustainability. 2020 Feb 5;12(3):1130.
[23] Archer T. The mechanics of housing collectivism: how forms and functions affect affordability. Housing Studies. 2022 Jan 2;37(1):73-102.
[24] Xu F, Xie Y, Zhou D. Air pollution’s impact on the settlement intention of domestic migrants: Evidence from China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2022 Jul 1;95:106761.
[25] Alyahya M, Agag G, Aliedan M, Abdelmoety ZH, Daher MM. A sustainable step forward: Understanding factors affecting customers’ behaviour to purchase remanufactured products. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2023 Jan 1;70:103172.
[26] Qi Y, Chan FK, O'Donnell EC, Feng M, Sang Y, Thorne CR, Griffiths J, Liu L, Liu S, Zhang C, Li L. Exploring the Development of the Sponge City Program (SCP): The Case of Gui'an New District, Southwest China. Frontiers in Water. 2021 May 20;3:676965.
[27] Sandberg H, Alnoor A, Tiberius V. Environmental, social, and governance ratings and financial performance: Evidence from the European food industry. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2023 May;32(4):2471-89.
[28] Khalid R, Razem M. The nexus of gendered practices, energy, and space use: A comparative study of middleclass housing in Pakistan and Jordan. Energy Research & Social Science. 2022 Jan 1;83:102340.
[29] Shen CC, Liang CF, Hsu CH, Chien JH, Lin HH. Research on the impact of tourism development on the sustainable development of reservoir headwater area using China’s Tingxi reservoir as an example. Water. 2020 Nov 25;12(12):3311.
[30] Lozano L, Taboada EB. The power of electricity: how effective is it in promoting sustainable development in rural off-grid islands in the Philippines?. Energies. 2021 May 9;14(9):2705.
[31] Liu T, Chen L, Yang M, Sandanayake M, Miao P, Shi Y, Yap PS. Sustainability considerations of green buildings: a detailed overview on current advancements and future considerations. Sustainability. 2022 Nov 3;14(21):14393.
[32] Shome S, Hassan MK, Verma S, Panigrahi TR. Impact investment for sustainable development: A bibliometric analysis. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2023 Mar 1;84:770-800.
[33] Balogh I, Srivastava M, Tyll L. Towards comprehensive corporate sustainability reporting: an empirical study of factors influencing ESG disclosures of large Czech companies. Society and Business Review. 2022 Oct 20;17(4):541-73.