Appraising the Relationship between Teachers’ Effectiveness and Teachers’ Productivity among Iranian EFL High School Teachers: A Mixed Methods Sequential Explanatory Design

Subject Areas : Research in English Language Pedagogy

Azadeh Ghorbanzadeh ¹ , Seyyed Hassan Seyyedrezaei ² , Behzad Ghonsooly ³ , Zari Sadat Seyyedrezaei ⁴

1 - Department of English Language Teaching, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran
2 - Department of English Language Teaching, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran
3 - Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
4 - Department of English Language Teaching, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran

Received: 2022-07-20 Accepted : 2022-09-18 Published : 2023-06-01

Keywords: Teacher of English as a Foreign Language (EFL), Teachers’ Productivity, Teachers’ Effectiveness, Mixed Methods study,

Abstract :

Due to the primary role of teachers as practitioners of educational principles, considering teachers’ effectiveness and productivity are regarded as significant issues in the field of language teaching which has recently received experts’ attention in SLA research. In response to this outlook in education, this interdisciplinary explanatory ‎sequential mixed-methods study aimed to address the relationship between EFL teachers’ effectiveness and productivity in the light of a famous model taken from the field of human resource management now applied to the EFL domain. On this premise, out of 100 English teachers, 80 female Iranian EFL high ‎school teachers, selected through convenience sampling from 34 public high schools in Mashhad, ‎Iran, participated in the study and responded to the Teachers’ Effectiveness Questionnaire (Kumar & Mutha, 1974), and Teachers’ Productivity Questionnaire (Hersey & Goldsmith, 1980). A semi-structured interview with 15 female EFL teachers was also undertaken to help triangulate the results. Results from the quantitative phase indicated that teachers’ perceptions of the teachers’ effectiveness were significantly correlated with their productivity. The qualitative findings added to the quantitative findings by explaining several main personal and organizational issues concerning EFL teachers’ perceptions of teachers’ effectiveness and productivity, for example, teachers’ interpersonal relationships, personal needs, motivational factors, subject knowledge, professional development, personal attributes, and administrators’ support. The findings of this investigation may have some implications for stakeholders, policymakers, administrators, and teacher educators to re-plan their professional development programs to meet the real needs of teachers in their particular educational context rather than providing teachers with theory-based programs.

References:

Adu, E. O., Oshati, T., & Eze, I. (2012). Career advancement, school relations, and support factors as determinants of teacher productivity in public schools in Oyo State, Nigeria. International Journal of Education, 4(4), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v4i4.2266

Aja-Okorie, U., & Usulor, U. I. (2016). Analysis of principals’ motivational practices for teachers’ effectiveness in public and private secondary schools in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Public Policy and Administration Research, 6(2), 74-83.

Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1-2), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.4

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H.Freeman

Chinyere, A. (2017). Dysfunctional consequences of conflict on teachers’ productivity: a theoretical insight. An International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 6(1), 146-161. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijah.v6i1.13

Coombe, C., Quirke, P., Shewell, J., & Al-Hamly, M. (2020). How the most productive TESOLers fit it all in: Strategies for productivity and efficiency. In C. Coombe, N. J. Anderson, & L. Stephenson (Eds.), Professionalizing your English language teaching. (pp. 85-101). Springer.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3^rd ed.). Sage.

Danielson, C. (2011). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2^nd ed.). ASCD.

Davidescu, A., Apostu, S. A., Paul, A., & Casuneanu, I. A. P. (2020). Work flexibility, job satisfaction, and job performance among Romanian employees- Implications for sustainable human resource management. Sustainability, 12(15), 1-53. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156086

Derakhshan, A., Coombe, C., Zhaleh, K., & Tabatabaeian, M. (2020). Examining the roles of continuing professional development needs and views of research in English language teachers’ success. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language (TESL-EJ), 24(3). Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej95/a2.pdf

Ellett, C. D., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Teacher evaluation, teacher effectiveness, and school effectiveness: Perspectives from the USA. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(1), 101–128. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025083214622

Etomes, S. E., & Molua, E. L. (2019). Strategies for enhancing the productivity of secondary school teachers in the southwest region of Cameroon Journal of Education and Learning, 8(1), 109-119. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v8n1p109

Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Balkin, D. B., & Cardy, R. L. (2016). Managing human resources (8 ed.). Pearson Education.

Hersey, H., & Goldsmith, M. (1980). A situational approach to performance planning. . Training and Development Journal, 34(11), 38-49.

Jacobs, J. A., & Winslow, S. E. (2004). Overworked faculty: Job stresses and family demands. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 596(1), 104-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204268185

Johnson, S. M., & Birkeland, S. (2003). Pursuing a “Sense of Success”: New teachers explain their career decisions American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 581-617. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040003581

Klassen, R. M., & Kim, L. E. (2019). Selecting teachers and prospective teachers: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 26, 32-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001

Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA: Text, audio, and video. . SAGE.

Kumar, P., & Mutha, D. N. (1974). Teacher effectiveness scale. Department of Psychology. Sardar Patel University, Vallabh Vidyanagar.

Malik, U., & Kapoor, S. (2014). Teaching effectiveness of school teachers to emotional maturity. Global Journal of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 1-9.

Marzano, R. (2007). The art and science of teaching: A comprehensive framework for effective instruction. . ASCD.

Mazandarani, O., & Troudi, S. (2017). Teacher evaluation: What counts as an effective teacher? In S. Hidri & C. Coombe (Eds.), Evaluation in Foreign Language Education in the Middle East and North Africa (pp. 3-28). Springer.

Orodho, A. J., Waweru, P. N., Getange, K. N., & Miriti, J. M. (2013). Progress towards the attainment of education for all (EFA) among nomadic pastoralists: Do home-based variables make a difference in Kenya? Journal of Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(21), 54-67.

Saldaña, J. (2012). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Heather, B., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893-1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8

Soodmand Afshar, H., & Doosti, M. (2014). Exploring the characteristics of effective Iranian EFL teachers from students’ and teachers’ perspectives. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 6(1), 205-230. https://doi.org/10.22111/ijals.2014.1997

Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers (3 ed.). ASCD.

Tahan Shizari, P., Ghaemi, F., Pourdana, N., & Tavassoli, K. D. a. v. E. t. e. q. I. t. i. o. m. i. (2022). Developing and validating EFL teacher effectiveness questionnaire: Investigating the impact of modular instruction Journal of Language and Translation, 12(3), 87-100.

Taylor, F. W. (1997). The principles of scientific management. Dover.

Vipinosa, L. D. (2015). Productivity in the academe: An inquest towards teaching effectiveness.  . International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research, 3(3), 452-456. Retrieved from http:// ijmcr.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Paper10452-456.pdf

Yusuf, M. A., & Adigun, J. T. (2010). The influence of school climate change on teachers’ productivity and students’ achievement Journal of Research in National Development, 8(2), 32-45.