Growth Evaluative Stimulation of Sugar beet Genotypes under Moderate Saline Stress

Subject Areas : crop production

كوروش ناظم ¹ , tooraj mir-mahmoodi ²

1 - دانش آموخته كارشناسي ارشد، گروه زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، واحد مهاباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، مهاباد- ایران.
2 - هیات علمی واحد مهاباد

Received: 2013-11-16 Accepted : 2015-02-19 Published : 2014-12-31

Keywords: mild salinity , sugar beet , genotypes , grow induce,

Abstract :

To study the growth stimulation of sugar beet ( Beta Vulgaris L. )under mild salinity, a field study was conducted in Agricultural Research Center in Miandoab in combined analysis design with three replications during the crop year of 2013 in two separated normal and mild salinity ( Ec = 4-5-ds/m ). Combined analyses of variance showed that genotype in environment interaction was statistically significant on sugar content, sugar yield, extraction of sugar coefficient and white sugar yield. Interactions of genotype in specific conditions had significant effect on sugar percentage, sugar yield, coefficient of sugar extraction and white sugar yield. In this research, mild salinity condition induced sugar beet growth and increased traits such as root yield, sugar content, molasses of sugar, white sugar content, sugar yield. The mild salinity also increased it up to 10.5% and 20% compared with normal conditions. Genotypes of 14, 15 and 16 respectively, by Origen 004, 005 and Isela, in average conditions of 9.04, 10.34, 10.81 in normal condition and 16.59, 16.37 and 11.93 ton/ha in stress condition showed the highest sugar yield and were identified as the most suitable genotypes in both situations. In both normal and mild saline conditions between root yield, sugar content, sugar yield and its extraction a positive and significant correlation were observed. The results of factor analysis showed that in normal conditions, there were four factors of 92.5 percent and in mild salinity three factors of 87.80 percent which justified the total variation in root and sugar yield.

References:

 Abbas, F., A. Mohanna., G. Al-Lahham., E. Al-Jbawi., and Z. AL-Jasem. 2010. Evaluation the Response of Some Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Genotypes under Saline Water Irrigation Conditions. Under published in Arab Journal for Dry Environments. ACSAD. 2010.
 Abbas, F., A. Mohanna., G.H. Allaham., and A. Jabbar, OR. 2012. Osmotic regulation of sugar in terms of salinity. Sugar Journal, 28 (1): 80-67.
 Ball, H., J. Oleary. 2003. Effects of salinity on growth and cation accumulation of sporobolus virginicus(poaceae),Am,J,Bot,90:1416-1424.
 Baradaran Firoozabadi, D. 2002. The relationship between morphological and physiological drought Batnsh beet cultivars. Thesis agriculture. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz. 173 pages ( In Persian).
 Draycott, A.P., and D.R. Christenson. 2003. Nutrients for sugar beet production: soil-plant Relationships.CABI publishing, Wallingford.UK.
 Durrant, M.J., A.P. Draycott., and G.F. Milford. 1985 . Effect of sodium fertilizer on water status and yield of sugar beet.volume88,Issue2,page 321-328.
 Emami, A., D. Mehrpuyan, M. Moharramzadeh. 2011. Quantitative and qualitative study of domestic and foreign trade figures multigeram sugar in Meshginshahr weather conditions. First National Conference on Advances in agricultural issues. Islamic Azad University, 2011( In Persian).
 FAOSTAT. 2014. Countries by commodity". Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations.
 Hajiboland, R., A. Joudmond., and K. Fotouhi, 2009. Mild salinity improves sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) quality.Acta Agricultur ae scandinavica,B,Volum59,Number 4,PP.295-305.
 Hajiboland, R., N. Ebrahimi., and C. Poschenrider. 2012.Bound putrescine,a Distinctive player under salt stress in the Natrophilic sugar beet in contrast to Glycophyte Tobacco.Journal of sciences,Islamic Republic of Iran23(2):105-114( In Persian).
 Hunter, K., L.Wu. 2005. Morphological and physiological response of five California native grass species to moderate salt spray:implications for landscape irrigation with reclaimed water .Journal .plant Nutr,28:247-270.
 Jesschhe , W.D., S. Kelagges., A. Hilpert., S. Bhatti, G. 1995. Saruar Partitioning and flows of ions and nutrients in salt-treated plant of Leptochloa fusca L . New Phytology. 130: 23-35.
 Judmand, M., R. Hajiboland., and K. Fotoohi. 2008. Biochemical characterization of some sugar beet varieties in saline conditions. Master Thesis Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz. ( In Persian).
 Lv,s., L. Nie., and P. Fan. 2011.Sodium plays a more important role then potassium and choride in growth of salicornia europaea.Acta physiol plant.
 Matoh,T., and D. Ohta. 1986. Effect of sodium application on growth of Amaranthus tricolor L.,plant Cell physiol,27:187-192.
 Murata, S., and J. Sekiya. 1992. Effects of sodium on photosynthesis .plant cell physiol,33:1239-1242.
 Ober, E., M.L. Bloa., C.J.A. Clark., A. Royal., K.W. Jaggard. and J.D. Pidgeon. 2005. Evaluation of physiological traits as indirect selection criteria for drought tolerance in sugar beet. Field Crops Research, 91, 231-249.
 Rafei, M., M. Karimi., and R. Shokrani. 1997. The effect of salinity on the quality and quantity of sugar beets. Abstracts of the Fourth Congress of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Technology, pp. 98-97.
 Short, D.C., and T.D. Colmer. 1999. Salt Tolerance in the halophyte Halosarcia pergranulate subsp.pergranulate.Ann Bot 83:207-213.
 Subbarao, G.V., R.M. Wheeler., L.H. Leving., G.W. Stutte. 2003. Glycine betaine accumulation, ionic and water relations of red beet at contrasting Levels of sodium supply. Journal of plant physiology. 2001. 158: 767-776.
 Taleghani, D., Q. Sadeghzadeh Hemayat., F. Matlobi., and S. Khyamym.2010. Evaluate the quantity and quality of sugar beet promising genotypes under drought stress. Journal of Sugar Beet (2) 25: 123-113 ( In Persian).
 Vahedi, M., S.Sadeghzadeh Hemayat., and R. Rahimzade Khoei. 2006. Assessment of sugar beet varieties using factor analysis. Journal of Sugar Beet. Vol 19 (2): 143-133 (In Persian).
 Wyn Jones, R.G., J. Gorham, 1983. Osmoregulation. Pp. 35-58. In Lange, O.L., P.S. Nobel, C.B.Osmond and H.Ziehler (eds.). Encyclopedia of plant physiology. New Series, Vol. 12C. physiological plant Ecology. Springer- verlay. Berlin.