The existence of a non-proliferation regime in the world has led governments to pursue their nuclear rights in a certain way to ensure the maintenance of international peace and security, as well as the national interests of each state regarding nuclear rights. To be. A
More
The existence of a non-proliferation regime in the world has led governments to pursue their nuclear rights in a certain way to ensure the maintenance of international peace and security, as well as the national interests of each state regarding nuclear rights. To be. Accordingly, Iran's nuclear rights and obligations were also formed under the documents that constitute nuclear rights and its restrictive documents. In the meantime, following the disputes between Iran and the International Atomic Energy Agency, Iran went through ups and downs under various sanctions, and of course, two international bodies, namely the Security Council and the International Atomic Energy Agency, played a role. They played a role. On this basis, we seek to examine whether the actions of these two international organizations in relation to the Iranian nuclear issue have been in the realm of international law? Examining the actions of the Security Council and the International Atomic Energy Agency in dealing with Iran's nuclear case, it is observed that not only technical and professional considerations are not the criterion, but also political considerations have led to the security of Iran's case and maximum pressure to shut down the nuclear industry. It has been Iran's missile industry. Also, the actions of the IAEA are not in accordance with its statutes, and the Security Council, regardless of the IAEA reports, declares the Iranian nuclear issue a threat to international peace and security.
Manuscript profile
