An Analysis of Interdisciplinary Knowledge Formation "GENOPOLITICS" And Explaining Political Behavior Based on the Nature of Human Genetics

Subject Areas :

Ehsan  Taheri Hajivand ¹ (Ph.D Candidate of International Relations. Islamic Azad University, Isfahan(Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran)
Seyed Javad  Emam Jomeh Zadeh ² (Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran)
Arash  Ghodousi ³ (Forensic Medicine Ph.D, Associate Professor of Community Health Research Center, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Isfahan, Iran)
Mahnaz  Goodarzi ⁴ (Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch , Isfahan, Iran)

Received: 2020-10-21 Accepted : 2021-01-05 Published : 2021-02-19

Keywords: gene, Politics, Genetics, Behavioral Genetics, Genopolitics,

Abstract :

Shortly After the Discovery of Genes, and Especially the New Findings in Genetics, it Became Clear that in Addition to Some Appearance and Physical Characteristics, Human Behavior is also Influenced by the Nature of his Internal Genetics. Hence, a New Interest and Motivation was Created Among a Group of Thinkers and Researchers in the Humanities to Study, Research and Defend the Genetic Foundations of Human Behavior, as well as to Combine their Knowledge with the Science of Genetics. Meanwhile, a New Generation of Thinkers and Researchers in Pol.Science and IR, with the Aim of Explaining Political Behaviors Based on the Nature of Human Genetics, began a Series of Studies and Researches that Eventually Led to the Emergence of New Interdisciplinary Knowledge Called "Genopolitics". However, so Far, Scientific Identity and their Achievements have not Been Carefully Studied in Domestic Research. This Study, by Using Tendency as Method, seeks to Snswer the Question: "What System and Discourse, Historical Background, Founders, Achievements and Challenges does Genopolitics Have?" The Findings of this Study Show that "Genopolitics is A Combined, Naturalistic, Empiricist-Rationalist and Justified Positivism Knowledge that has been Explains Political Behavior Based on the Genetic Nature Over more than Four Decades from the Beginning,

References:

 ایوبی، حجت الله و سیدنادر نوربخش(1392)، «گسترش جریان راست افراطی در اروپا»، مطالعات روابط بین الملل(پژوهشنامه ی روابط بین الملل)، 23: 119-77 

پینکر، استیون(1394)، لوح سپید؛ انکار مدرن ذات بشر، ترجمه بهزاد سروری و دانیال قارونی، تهران: نگاه معاصر، 504 صفحه 

حقیقت، سید صادق(1389)، «مسئله ساختار/کارگزار در علوم اجتماعی»، روش‌شناسی علوم انسانی، 64 و 65: 147-166 

خسروپناه، عبدالحسین(1390)، جریان شناسی ضدفرهنگ ها. تهران: موسسه فرهنگی حکمت نوین اسلامی 

خرمشاد، محمد باقر و سید ابراهیم سرپرست سادات(1392)، «جریان شناسی سیاسی به مثابه روش»، فصلنامه مطالعات میان رشته ای در علوم انسانی، 2: 90-61 

خادمی، عین الله(1375)، «تاریخچه اجمالی تجربه گرایی و واکنش های متعارض با آن»، کیهان اندیشه، 68: 13-37 

عالم، عبدالرحمن(1389)، بنیادهای علم سیاست، تهران: نشر نی 

لمکه، توماس(1396)، درآمدی پیشرفته بر زیست‌سیاست، ترجمه بهراد رحمانی، تهران: نشر مرکز 

متولی‌زاده اردکانی، علی(1395)، «پروژه‌ی ژنوم انسان و چالش‌های اخلاقی و حقوقی در جوامع انسانی»، فصلنامه اخلاق زیستی، 19: 124-101 

مشیرزاده، حمیرا(1394)، تحول در نظریه‌های روابط بین‌الملل، تهران: سمت

ملایری، محمد حسین(1391)، «دقیقه‌ای در باب نسبی گرایی، مطلق گرایی و عینیت باوری»، فصلنامه راهبرد، 64: 323-293 

هیمر، دین و پیتر کوبلند(1382)، نقش ژنها در شکل‌گیری شخصیت، ترجمه ع متولی‌زاده اردکانی، تهران: چهر English Sources: 

Alford J R, Funk C L, Hibbing R (2008), “Beyond Liberals and Conservatives to Political Genotypes and Phenotypes”, Perspectives on Politics, 2: 321-328 

Alford J R, Funk C, Hibbing J R (2005), “Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted?”, American Political Science Review, 2: 153-167 

Alford J R, Hibbing J R (2008), “The New Empirical Biopolitics”, The Annual Review of Political Science, 11: 183-203 (online Available from: http://polisci.annualreviews.org) 

Alford J, Funk C L, Hibbing J R (2005), “Are Political Orientations Genetically Transmitted?”. American Political Science Review, 99(2): 153-167 

Bell, D (2015), In biology we trust, In Jacobi, D & Freyberg-Inan, A(Eds.), Human Beings in International Relations (pp. 113-131), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 

Charney E, English W (2012), “Candidate Genes and Political Behavior”, American Political Science Review, 106(1): 1-34 

Charney E, English W (2013), “Genopolitics and the Science of Genetics”, American Political Science Review, 107(2): 382-395 

Dawes Ch T and Weinschenk A C (2020), “On the genetic basis of political orientation”, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34:173-178 

Dawes Ch, Fowler J H (2009), “Partisanship, Voting, and the Dopamine D2 Receptor Gene”, The Journal of Politics, 3: 1157-1171

Greek and Roman Antiquities Dictionary (1890), GENOS, William Smith, LLD, William Wayte, G E, Marindin, ]Cited 2020 July 7[, Available from: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0063:entry=genos-cn 

Djupe P A, Hill KQ, Smith, A E, Sokhey A E (2020), “Putting personality in context: determinants of research productivity and impact in political science”, Scientometrics 124: 2279–2300 

Dubey A, Pandey M (2016), “Deciphering the Genetics of Political Behavior in Organisations”, Science and Culture, 1-2: 42-45 

Dulesh S (2014), “Genopolitics and the Future of Secular Humanism”, Humanist Perspectives, 189: 16-23 

Eaves, L J, Eysenck, H J, & Martin, N G (1989), Genes, culture and personality: An empirical approach, Padstow: Academic Press, 465p. 

Eaves, L, Eysenck, H (1974), “Genetics and the development of social attitudes”, Nature, 249: 288–289 

Esposito R (2008), Bios: Biopolitics and Philosophy, United States: University of Minnesota Press, 230 p. 

Fazekas Z, Littvay L (2012), “Choosing sides: The genetics of why we go with the loudest”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3: 389-408 

Fowler J H, Baker L A, Dawes Ch T (2008), “Genetic Variation in Political Participation”, American Political Science Review, 2: 233-248 

Fowler J H, Dawes CH T (2008), “Two Genes Predict Voter Turnout”, The Journal of Politics, 3: 579-594

Fowler J H, Dawes Ch T (2013), “In Defense of Genopolitics”, The American Political Science Review, 2: 362-374 

Hatemi P K, Alford J R, Hibbing J R, Martin N G, Eaves L J (2009), “Is There a Party in Your Genes?”, Political Research Quarterly, 3: 584-600 

Hatemi P K, McDermott R (2012), “A Neurobiological Approach to Foreign Policy Analysis: Identifying Individual Differences in Political Violence”, Foreign Policy Analysis, 2: 111-129 

Hatemi P K, Eaves L, McDermott R (2012), “It’s the end of ideology as we know it”, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3: 345-369 

Hatemi P K, Funk C L, Medland S E, Maes H M, Silberg J L, Martin N G, Eaves L J (2009), “Genetic and Environmental Transmission of Political Attitudes Over a Life Time”, The Journal of Politics, 3: 1141-1156 

Hatemi P K, McDermott R (2012), “The genetics of politics: discovery, challenges, and progress”, Trends in Genetics, 10: 525-533 

Hatemi P K, McDermott R (2012), “The genetics of politics: discovery, challenges, and progress”, Trends in Genetics, 10: 525-533 

Hatemi P K, Medland S E, Morley K I, Heath A C, Martin N G (2007), “The Genetics of Voting: An Australian Twin Study”, Behav Genet, 37: 435-448 

Henning C (2012), “Naturalistic Values and Progressive Politics; a Missing Link Between Pragmatism and Social Theory”, European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy(Online), 1: 1-24 Available from: URL:http://journals.openedition.org/ejpap/770 DOI: 10.4000/ejpap.770 

Hlatshwayo, M, & Fomunyam, K (2018), “Genopolitics: The dormant niche in political science curriculum in South African universities”, The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 14(1), 9 pages. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v14i1.470 

Larregue J (2018), “Une bombe dans la discipline: l’émergence du mouvement génopolitique en science politique”, Social Science Information, 57(2): 159-195

Lemke Th (2010), “From State Biology to the Government of Life: Historical Dimensions and Contemporary Perspectives of Biopolitics”, Journal of Classical Sociology, 4: 421-438 

Littvay L (2020), “Genetics and Heritability Research on Political Decision Making”, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics (Accepted), available on: https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1012 

Martin, N, Eaves, L, Heath, A, Jardine, R, Feingold, L, & Eysenck, H (1986), “Transmission of Social Attitudes”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 83(12), 4364-4368 

McDermott R, Dawes C, Prom-Wormley E, Eaves L, Hatemi P K (2013), “MAOA and Aggression: A Gene-Environment Interaction in Two Populations”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 6: 1043-1064 

Misak C (2016), “Pragmatism and the Naturalist Project in Ethics and Politics: Lessons from Peirce, Lewis and Ramsey”, Political Studies Review, 1: 7-16 

Newrepublic.com (2014), “Are Political Beliefs Predetermined at Birth?”, in Newrepublic.com. Retrieved July 7, 2020, from https://newrepublic.com/article/119794/genopolitics-social-science-and-origin-political-beliefs 

Orey B D A, Park H (2012), “Nature, nurture, and ethnocentrism in the Minnesota twin study”, Twin Research and Human Genetics, 1: 71-73 

Oskarsson S, Dawes Ch, Johannesson M, Magnusson P K E (2012), “The genetic origins of the relationship between psychological traits 21 and social trust”, Twin Research and Human Genetics, 1: 21-33

Plomin R, DeFries J C, Knopik V S, & Neiderhiser J M (2016), “Top 10 Replicated Findings from Behavioral Genetics”, Perspectives on psychological science: a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 11(1): 3–23. 

Roll-Hansen N (2014), “The holist tradition in twentieth century genetics, Wilhelm Johannsen’s genotype concept”, The Journal of Physiology, 11: 2431-2438 

Settle J E, Dawes Ch T, Christakis N A, Fowler J H (2010), “Friendships Moderate an Association Between a Dopamine Gene Variant and Political Ideology”, Journal of Political, 4: 1189-1198

Shostak S, Beckfield J (2015), “Making A Case for Genetics: Interdisciplinary Visions and Practices in the Contemporary Social Sciences”, Advances in Medical Sociology, 16: 97-125 

Stevens R J (1988), “Human Nature and the Nature of Science”, The American Biology Teacher, 6: 354-361 

Sturgis P, Read S, Hatemi P K, Zhu G, Trull T, Wright M J, Martin N G (2010), “A Genetic Basis for Social Trust?”, Political Behavior, 32: 205-230 

Tesser A (1993), “The importance of heritability in psychological research: the case of attitudes”, Psychological Review, 1: 129-142 

Vernon, H (1909), “Elemente der exakten Erblichkeitslehre”, Nature, 81: 424 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/081424a0 Date Access: 2020/08/06 1399/05/17 

Yudin G B (2020), “The Genetic Body: Politics of Genetic Reductionism in Contemporary Natural Sciences”, Chelovek, 30(6): 100-111