Analyzing the factors that underlie the efficiency of urban land management based on the integrated governance model of urban land of actors (Case study: Iran and Gorgan city)

Subject Areas : Architecture and urbanization

ali  vazirinasirabad ¹ (Ph.D Candidate, Department of Urbansim, Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Kianoosh  Zakerhaghighi ² (Associate Professor, Department of Urbanism, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamadan, Iran)
Arash  Baghdadi ³ (Department of urban planning , shahr-e-Qods branch,Islamic Azad university,Tehran ,Iran)

Received: 2020-06-18 Accepted : 2021-03-02 Published : 2022-08-23

Keywords: pathology, Policy, Integrated Urban Land Management Pattern,

Abstract :

Urban land management, with its many complexities and obstacles, and its many actors and stakeholders, needs to be integrated and holistic. Therefore, new approaches have been introduced to recognize it, such as land governance, which is the framework of ideas and the bedrock of sustainable local management. Accordingly, in this study, using quantitative-survey and qualitative methods at three spatial levels (empowering environment or system, institutional and individual) to the pathology of urban policy-making and urban land management in Iran with emphasis on actors and stakeholders within the components. Spierman's model, multivariate linear regression, and path analysis were analyzed in the Amos software environment for data analysis. The results showed that there is a significant relationship between the components of integrated urban land governance and its management efficiency and urban policies in Iran, despite decades of experience, have failed to address issues such as recognizing local and regional capacities and their participation. In addition, there are shortcomings in defining the common and consensual perspective of all actors, the existence of multipartyism, the lack of a unified consensual attitude, the negative dominance of the power of some influential actors, the existence of centralized decision-making and executive structures, and the lack of a platform for integrated land governance. The main reason for the inefficiency of urban policies in Iran from the perspective of the integrated model of urban governance of actors.

References:

برک پور، ناصر و اسدی، ایرج. (1390). مدیریت و حکمروایی شهری. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه هنر.

کامیار، غلامرضا. (1395). حقوق شهری و شهرسازی. تهران: انتشارات مجد.

Borras, Saturnino M., & Franco, Jennifer C. (2010). Contemporary Discourses and Contestations around

Pro-Poor Land Policies and Land Governance. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(1), 1-32.

Enemark, S., & Williamson, I.P .(2004). Capacity building in land administration - a conceptual approach. Minerva Access in melbourn, 39(294), 639-650.

Danesh pajouh, H., & Ghoreishi, F. (2019). Explaining the Conceptual Framework of Good City-Based  Governance On Integrated Urban Management. Int. J. Urabn Manage Energy Sustainability, 2(1), 46-53.

Enemark, E. (2009). A global land management perspective. Nepalese Journal on Geoinformatics, 9, 21-25.

E.dowall, D., & Clarke, G. (1996). A Framework for Reforming Urban Land Policies In Developing Countries. Washington D.C: The World Bank.

Evans, B., Marko J., Sundback, S., & Theobald, K. (2005). Governing Sustainable Cities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49(6), 849-867

Fukuda Parr, S., Lopes, C., & Malik, K. (2002). Capacity for Development: New Solution for old Problems. United Nations Development Programmes, New York.

FAO. (2007). Good Governance in Land Tenure and Administration. FAO Land Tenure Studies (9), Rome, Italy.www.fao.org.

Griffiths, A., Haigh, N., & Rassias, j. (2007). A Framework for Understanding Institutional Governance Systems and Climate Change: the Case of Australia. European Management Journal, 25(6), 417-427.

Healey, P. (2007). Urban complexity and spatial strategies. toward a rational planning for out times, Routledge

Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2001). Neo-Marshallin Nodes, Institutional Thickness and Britain s Motor Sport Valley: Thick or Thin? Environmental and Planning A, 33(7),1169-1183.

Hun Lee, J. (2008). Regional Governance and Collaboration: A Comparative Study on Economic Development Policy Process in Minneapolis and Pittsburgh Regions. Ph.D Dissertation,Faculty of Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh, 9-10

McAuslan, P. (1985). Urban land and shelter for the poor. London: Earthscan.

Gibbs, C., Jonas, A., Suzanne, R., & Spooner, D. (2001). Governance, Institutional Capacity and Partnership in Econaomic Development: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Evidence from the Humber,. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 26(1), 103-119.

Palmer, D.Et al. (2009).Towards Improved Land Governance. Land Tenure Working Paper 11, FAO and Human Settlements Programme, 9.

Pike, A., Rodriguez-Pose, A., & Tomaney, J. (2006). Local and regional development. London: Rutledge, 3-122

Selin, S., & D. Chavez. (1995).  Developoning a Collaborative Model for environmental Planning and Management. In Environmental Management, 19(2), 189-195.

Simson, R., Stough, R. R., & Salazar, M. (2009). Leadership and Institution in Regional Endogenous Development. Edward Elgar, 20-32

Shrestha, R. (2019). Understanding Urban Land  Governance Through “Action Space”: Implications For Access To Land For Low-Income Housing In Managing INFORMAL Settlents. The degree of doctor at the University of Twente, prof.dr. T.T.M. Palstra, on account of the decision of the Doctorate Board, April 2019.

Qtiashat, D., Makhmreh, Z., Abu Taleb, H., & Khlaifat, A. (2018). Urban Land Use Pattern and Road Network Characteristics Using GIS in Al Salt City. Jordan Modern Applied Scence, 12(4),128-142.

Kivell, Ph. (1993). Land and  the City Patterns and Processes of Urban Change. London and New York. Rutledge.

UN-HABITAT.(2008). Secure Land Rights for All, GLTN contributes to the implementation of pro poor land policies to achieve secure land rights for all, The Global Land Tool Network.www.gltn.net.

Wheeler, S. (2002). The new regionalism: Key characteristics of an emerging movement. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 260-270.