Investigating the effect of market knowledge, audience knowledge and relationship capabilities on organizational performance considering the mediating role of the intellectual capital of Payame Noor University, Shiraz Center
Subject Areas :
Homa Masoomi
1
,
حسن سلطانی
2
*
,
عباس بابایی نژاد شهرآباد
3
,
سنجر سلاجقه
4
,
مهدی محمد باقری
5
1 - PhD Student, Department of Public Administration, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran
2 - استادیار گروه مدیریت، واحد شیراز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، شیراز، فارس
3 - استایار گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران
4 - دانشیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، کرمان، ایران
5 - استادیارگروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، کرمان، ایران
Keywords: Intellectual capital, organizational capability, organizational performance, knowledge-based approach, relationship-based approach, competency-based approach,
Abstract :
While previous research examines how firms with specific capabilities achieve organizational performance, few studies take a holistic approach. In this study, a comprehensive model is adopted to examine how different capabilities actually affect organizational performance. Also, the mediating effect of intellectual capital was considered. The organizational capabilities and performance were investigated by a questionnaire including professors, experts, and managers of Faculties of Economics, Management, and Social Sciences of Payame Noor University, Shiraz Center. Thus, the purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of market knowledge capabilities, audience knowledge, and relationship on organizational performance considering the mediating role of the intellectual capital of Payame Noor University, Shiraz Center. In order to achieve this purpose, structural equation modeling (SEM) based on partial least squares (PLS) was used. The elements of the analysis include market knowledge, audience knowledge and relationship capabilities, and the mediating variable of intellectual capital. The results show that market knowledge, audience knowledge, and relationship capabilities have positive effects on intellectual capital at Payame Noor University, Shiraz Center. The results also show that intellectual capital has a direct and significant effect on organizational performance. Finally, the results show that intellectual capital has a mediating effect on the relationship between organizational capabilities (market knowledge, audience knowledge, relationship, and innovation) and organizational performance at Payame Noor University, Shiraz Center. This study helps organizations that intend to increase organizational performance, especially educational organizations by showing the mediating effects of intellectual capital on the relationship between organizational capability and organizational performance.
1- اکبری، م.، حاتمی نژاد، م.، و هوشمند، م.، (1399). تأثیر انتقال فناوری، برون سپاری، قابلیت های سازمانی بر عملکرد نوآورانه، فصلنامه مدیریت نوآوری در سازمان‌های دفاعی، دوره 3، شماره 8، 76-49.
2- تورنگ، س.ک.، (1396). ارائه مدل بومی ارزیابی تاثیر مدیریت دانش بر عملکرد دانشگاه های منتخب کشور با عامل میانجی توانمندی های فرایند سازمانی، پایان‌نامه دکترای تخصصی (PhD) دانشگاه مازندران، دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اداری.
3- حیدری، م.، و نیکویی، م.ح.، (1398). بررسی نقش میانجی سرمایه فکری، نوآوری و استراتژی‌های سازمانی بین تسهیم دانش و عملکرد سازمانی، تحقیقات مدیریت آموزشی، دوره 11، شماره 41، 15-33.
4- دانایی فرد، حسن، برزگر، فاطمه و احمدی، هانیه (1394). سازوکارهای ارتقای قابلیت های سازمانی در بخش دولتی، مجله علمی پژوهشی مدیریت سازمان های دولتی، دوره 3، شماره 3 (پیاپی 11)، صفحه 91-106.
5- صفری، ع..، مشرف جوادی، م.ح.، و میرزایی فر، م.، (1396). تأثیر سرمایه فکری بر عملکرد سازمانی؛ نقش میانجی‌گری چابکی سازمانی و مزیت رقابتی، مدیریت اجرایی، دوره 9، شماره 17، 168-149.
6- عطاران، جواد؛ دیواندری، علی؛ آدینف، حیات (1391). شناسايي عوامل مؤثر بر تحكيم بازار (تحقق مزيت رقابتي پايدار) خدمات بانكي در بانك ملت بر مبناي ديدگاه منبع محور، مدیریت بازرگانی، دوره 4، صص: 112-91.
7- نوروزي چشمه علي، ا.، روشن، س.ع،. و وفادار، م.، (1396).تحليل اثر سرمايه فکري بر عملکرد سازماني با نقش ميانجي مديريت دانش در شرکت پايانه هاي نفتي ايران ، آموزش و توسعه منابع انساني، دوره 4، شماره 13، 119-95.
8- Al‐kalouti, J, Vikas, A., Garza‐Reyes., A. and Zwiegelaar, B. (2020). Investigating innovation capability and organizational performance in service firms, Strategic Change. 2020;29:103–113.
9- Allameh, S. M. (2018). Antecedents and consequences of intellectual capital: The role of social capital, knowledge sharing and innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(5), 858-874.
10- Andersen, P. H., and Kumar, R. (2006). Emotions, trust and relationship development in business relationships: A conceptual model for buyereseller dyads. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(4), 522e535.
11- Andreeva, T., and Garanina, T. (2016). Do all elements of intellectual capital matter for organizational performance? Evidence from Russian context. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 17(2), 397-412.
12- Barkat, W., Loo-See, B., Adeel, B. and Riaz, A. (2018). Impact of intellectual capital on innovation capability and organizational performance: An empirical investigation, Serbian Journal of Management 13 (2) (2018) 365 – 379.
13- Barkat, W., Loo-See, B., Adeel, B. and Riaz, A. (2018). Impact of intellectual capital on innovation capability and organizational performance: An empirical investigation, Serbian Journal of Management 13 (2) (2018) 365 – 379.
14- Barzegar, F. (2020). Mechanisms for improving organizational capabilities in the public sector, Master's thesis of Tarbiat Modares University, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences.
15- Baxter, R. and Matear, S. (2004). Measuring intangible value in business-to-business buyereseller relationships: An intellectual capital perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(6), 491e500.
16- Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measure and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63e76.
17- Bontis, N. (1998). Intellectual capital: An exploratory study that develops measure and models. Management Decision, 36(2), 63e76.
18- Camfield, C., Giacomello, C. and Sellitto, M. (2018). The impact of intellectual capital on performance in Brazilian companies. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. Volume 13, Issue 2: 23-32.
19- Chakravorti, B. (2022). Finding Competitive Advantage in Adversity. Harvard Business Review, 88(11), 102-108.
20- Chen, Y.-C., Li, P.-C., and Arnold, T. J. (2013). Effects of collaborative communication on the development of market-relating capabilities and relational performance metrics in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(8), 1181-1191.
21- Das, T. K., and Teng, B.-S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491-512.
22- Day, G. S. (1994). The capabilities of market-driven organization. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), 37-52.
23- Dyer, J. H. and Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660e679.
24- Garcia-Murillo, M., and Annabi, H. (2002). Customer knowledge management. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(8), 875-884.
25- Gummesson, E. (2002). Total relationship marketing (2nd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann Publications.
26- and Process Management, 23(4), 259-273.
27- Hooley, G. J., Greenley, G. E., Cadogan, J. W., and Fahy, J. (2004). The performance impact of marketing resources. Journal of Business Research, 58(1), 18-27.
28- Huang, Ch. and Huang, S. (2020). External and internal capabilities and organizational performance: Does intellectual capital matter?. Asia Pacific Management Review. 25: 111-120
29- Jin, J. L., Shu, C. and Zhou, K. Z. (2019). Product newness and product performance in new ventures: Contingent roles of market knowledge breadth and tacitness. Industrial Marketing Management, 76, 231-241.
30- Johnston, W. J., Khalil, S., Jain, M. and Cheng, J. M.-S. (2012). Determinants of joint action in international channels of distribution: The moderating role of psychic distance. Journal of International Marketing, 20(3), 34e49.
31- Kandampully, J. (2002). Innovation as the core competency of a service organisation: The role of technology, knowledge and networks. European Journal of Innovation Management, 5(1), 18-26.
32- Kianto, A., Ritala, P., Spender, J.-C. and Vanhala, M. (2014). The interaction of intellectual capital assets and knowledge management practices in organizational value creation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 15(3), 362-375.
33- Kohli, A. K., and Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18.
34- Li, T., and Calantone, R. J. (1998). The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: Conceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 13-29.
35- Menguc, B., Auh, S., and Uslu, A. (2013). Customer knowledge creation capability and performance in sales teams. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(1), 19-39.
36- Moorman, C. (1995). Organizational market information processes: Cultural antecedents and new product outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 318-335.
37- Mu, J. (2015). Marketing capability, organizational adaptation and new product development performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 49, 151-166.
38- Murphy, M., and Sashi, C. M. (2018). Communication, interactivity, and satisfaction in B2B relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 68, 1-12.
39- Nasution, N. and Mavondo, F. (2018). Customer value in the hotel industry: What managers believe they deliver and what customer experience. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(2):204-213.
40- Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
41- Nora, L. (2019). Trust, commitment, and customer knowledge: Clarifying relational commitments and linking them to repurchasing intentions. Management Decision. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2017-0923.
42- Pedro, E., Leit~ao, J., and Alves, H. (2018). Intellectual capital and performance: Taxonomy of components and multi-dimensional analysis axes. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(2), 407-452.
43- Ramachandran, S.D., Chong, S.C. and Wong, K.Y. (2018). Knowledge Management Practices and Strategic Enablers in Public Universities: A Gap Analysis, Campus Wide Information Systems, 30 (2), 76 – 94.
44- Rehman, Sh. and, Rapiah, M. and Hazeline, A. (2019). The mediating role of organizational capabilities between organizational performance and its determinants, Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research volume 9, Article number: 30.
45- Roberts, K., Varki, S. and Brodie, R. (2003). Measuring the quality of relationships in consumer services: An empirical study. European Journal of Marketing, 37(1/2), 169e196.
46- Salunke, S., Weerawardena, J., and McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2019). The central role of knowledge integration capability in service innovation-based competitive strategy. Industrial Marketing Management, 76, 144-156.
47- Sashi, C. (2012). Customer engagement, buyer-seller relationships, and social media. Management Decision, 50(2), 253e272.
48- Sharma, S. and Cao, S. Y. (2016). Innovation capability, marketing capability and firm performance: A two-nation study of China and Korea. Asian Business and Management, 15(1), 32e56.
49- Sharma, S. and Cao, S. Y. (2016). Innovation capability, marketing capability and firm performance: A two-nation study of China and Korea. Asian Business and Management, 15(1), 32e56.
50- Shin, S., He, X., and Kim, S. Y. (2016). Innovation capability, marketing capability and firm performance: A two-nation study of China and Korea. Asian Business and Management, 15(1), 32-56.
51- Singh, S., Darwish, T. K., and Poto_cnik, K. (2016). Measuring organizational performance: A case for subjective measures. British Journal of Management, 27(1), 214-224.
52- Walsh, S. and Linton, J. (2020). The Strategy-Technology Firm Fit Audit: A Guide to Opportunity Assessment and Selection. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2): 199-216.
53- Wang, Z., Sharma, P. N. and Cao, J. (2016). From knowledge sharing to firm performance: A predictive model comparison. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4650e4658.
54- Wang, Z., Sharma, P. N. and Cao, J. (2016). From knowledge sharing to firm performance: A predictive model comparison. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4650e4658.
55- Wetzels, M., Odekkerken-Schroder, G. and Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration, MIS Quarterly, 33(1): 177.
56- Wetzels, M., Odekkerken-Schroder, G. and Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration, MIS Quarterly, 33(1): 177.
57- Zaheer, A., and Venkatraman, N. (1995). Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic Management Journal, 16(5), 373-392.