Explain the role of accounting paradigms in promoting the qualitative characteristics of society: Sociology of Financial Reporting
Subject Areas : Management Accountingraheleh homayouni rad 1 , fereydun rahnamaye rudposhti 2 , hashem nikoomaram 3 , mehrdad navabakhsh 4
1 - Ph.D. student of Accounting ,Islamic Azad university, Science and Research branch, Tehran, Iran
2 - Professor-Department of Accounting and Management-University of Research Sciences-Tehran-Iran
3 - Professor of Accounting Department, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research branch, Tehran,Iran
4 - Professor of sociology Department, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research branch, Tehran,Iran
Keywords: Social accounting gives compan, Economic, financial and productive insti, social indicators and the move, and thereby carry out their ac, draw a logical and measured ba, seeks to explain the new appro, the study sample was 170 peopl, and the paradigms proposed in ,
Abstract :
* بلند نظر ، حمید و فیل سرایی، مهدی (1395). توسعه چارچوب حسابداری مسئولیت اجتماعی به سمت ارزیابی واحدهای اقتصادی، فصلنامه پژوهش های جدید در مدیریت و حسابداری، 3(17): 1-14
* بنی طالبی دهکردی، بهاره؛ رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون؛ نیکومرام، هاشم و طالبنیا، قدرت اله. (1394). تبیین نظریه کنشگر شبکه در حسابداری از منظر دانش. فصلنامه دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت. 4(16)، 111-130
* بوریل، گیبسون و مورگان، گارت. (1383). نظریه های کلان جامعه شناختی و تجزیه و تحلیل سازمان: عناصر جامعه شناختی حیات سازمانی. ترجمه محمد تقی نوروزی. چاپ اول. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
* خواجوی، شکرالله؛ حلاج، محمد و گنجی، کیانوش. (1395). قایسه نظریه دامنه و نظریه روش در پژوهشهای حسابداری مدیریت: با تاکید بر نظریه کنشگر- شبکه. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی حسابداری مدیریت، 9(29)، 53-72.
* رحیمیان، نظامالدین و توکل نیا، اسماعیل. (1391). بررسی ارتباط بین بکارگیری مفاهیم حسابداری مسئولیتهای اجتماعی با اندازه و عملکرد شرکتهای پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. مقاله ارائه شده در نخستین همایش ملی حسابداری ارزشی، تهران: دانشگاه علوم اقتصادی.
* رهنمای رودپشتی، فریدون؛ نیکومرام، هاشم و بنی طالبی دهکردی، بهاره. (1395). نظام اطلاعات حسابداری مدیریت مبتنی بر شبکه کنشگران. تهران: انتشارات ترمه
* زریباف، سید مهدی. (1387). ارتباط اقتصاد و جامعهشناسی. مجله اقتصادی – ماهنامه بررسی مسائل و سیاستهای اقتصادی، 79 و 80، 27-36.
* شیخی، محمد تقی. (1391). حسابداری اجتماعی بعنوان ضامن نظم و توسعه اجتماعی: ارتباط بین جامعه شناسی و حسابداری. دهمین همایش ملی حسابداری ایران.
* رهنمایی رودپشتی، و همکاران (1394). تبیین نظریه شبکه کنشگران (ANT)در حسابداری از منظر دانش، فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت سال چهارم، شماره 16، زمستان 1394
* لاریمی, جعفر, محسنی, ابراهیم. (1393). تحقیقات تفسیری حسابداری،چالش ها و فرصت های تحقیق در حسابداری. پژوهش حسابداری. 4(3), 105-119. doi: 10.22051/ijar.2015.507
* موسی نژاد، سید روح الله، نمازی، محمد (1395). بررسی کاربرد پژوهش های اقدامی در حسابداری، نشریه مطالعات حسابداری و حسابرسی، دوره 5، شماره 19، پاییز 1395، صفحه 4-23.
* Baxter, B., & Chave, A. (2003). Mere Exposure to Money Increases Endorsement of Free-Market Systems and Social Inequality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 5(12), 235-278.
* Deakin, N. (2015). Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), 31–36.
* De Villiers, C. and D. Alexander (2014). “The Institutionalisation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting”, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 198-212.
* Fisher, J.M. (2014). Fairer shores: Tax havens, tax avoidance, and corporate social responsibility. Boston UniversityLaw Review, 94, 337-365.
* Hoi, Ch., Wu, Q. and Zhang, H. (2014). Is Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Associated with Tax Avoidance? Evidence from Irresponsible CSR Activities. Saunders College of Business, Rochester Institute of Technology.
* Hřebíček, J.; Soukopová, J.; Štencl, M.; and O. Trenz (2014). “Integration of Economic, Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance Performance and Reporting in Enterprises”, Acta Universitatis Agriculturaeet Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Vol. 7, No. 59, pp. 157-166.
* Macionis, J.J. and Plummer, K. (2012). Sociology: A Global Introduction. Harlow, England; New York : Pearson/Prentice Hall.
* Rankin, M., Stanton, P., McGowan, S., Ferlauto, K. and Tilling, M. (2012). Contemporary Issues in Accounting. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
* Thirumanickam, N.; Rajamanoharan, I. D.; and N. Nordin (2008). “Stakeholders’ Perceptions and Expectations of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in Malaysia”, Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Conference for Social and Environmental Accounting Research, 7 to 9 December, The Centre for Accounting, Governance and Sustainability, The University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
* Tweedie, D. (2018). Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Available online 4 February 2018.
* Joannides, V., And Berland, N. (2015). Constructing a research network: accounting knowledge in production. Accounting, Auditing
* Hassard, J. Wolfram, J. (2013). Can Sociological Paradigms Still Inform Organizational Analysis? A Paradigm Model for Post-Paradigm Times. journals.sagepub.com
* Sikka, P. (2011). Accounting for human rights: The challenge of globalization and foreign investment agreements. Journal of Critical Perspectives on Accounting. London:. 22 (8), 811-18.
* Richardson, I. (2011). ‘But does sustainability need capitalism or an integrated report’ a commentary on ‘The International Integrated Reporting Council: A story of failure’. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 18–22
* Keli, G. (2000), Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis, Guildford and King’s Lynn, Gower.
* Catto, M. (2002), “The scallops of St. Brieuc Bay. Some elements of a sociology of translation”, in Law, J. (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp. 196-233.
* Roslender, R. & Hart, S.J. (2006). In Search of Strategic Management Accounting: Theoretical and Field Study Perspectives. Management Accounting Research , 14, 255-279
* Dick, W.F. (2009), “Experts, networks and inscriptions in the fabrication of accounting images: a story of the representation of three public hospitals”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 20 Nos 2/3, pp. 111-145.
* model, S. P. (2010). Revisiting the roles of accounting in society. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 49, 41–50.
* Alcouffe, S., Berland, N., And Levant, Y. (2008). Actor-networks and the diffusion of management accounting innovations: A comparative study. Management Accounting Research, 19(1), 1-17
* Lee, C., & Park, M. S. (2003). Subjectivity in fair-value estimates, audit quality, and informativeness of other comprehensive income. Advances in accounting, 29(2), 218-231.
* Jensen, R (2011) The landscape of qualitative research: theories and issues, Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp195-220 .
* Justesen, L. and Mouritsen, J. (2011), “Effects of actor-network theory in accounting research,” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 161-193
* Briers, M. and Chua, W.F. (2001), “The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 237-269
* Hyvo¨ nen, T., Ja¨ rvinen, J. and Pellinen, J. (2013), “A virtual integration – the management control system in a multinational enterprise”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 45- 61
* Joannides, V., And Berland, N. (2013). Constructing a research network: accounting knowledge in production. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(4), 512-538.
* Pipan, T. and Czarniawska, B. (2010), “How to construct an actor-network: management accounting from idea to practice”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 243-251.
* Cuganesan, S. and Lee, R. (2008), “Intraorganisational influences in procurement networks controls: the impacts of information technology”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 141-170.
* Geva. A,.(2008), “Three Models of Corporate Social Responsibility: Interrelationships between Theory”, Research, and Practice. Business and Society Review. Vol.113, PP.1-41.
* Gilbert, D. U., Rasche, A., & Waddock, S. 2011. Accountability in a global economy: The emergence of international accountability standards. Business Ethics Quarterly,21(1): 23-44.
* Lee, M.D.P. (2008), A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: its evolutionary path and the road ahead, International Journal of Management Reviews, 10 (1): 53–73.
* Molina.M (2010)“ The Corporate Role in a Changing Society: A Model of Sensemaking and of Firm Characterization” , PHD Thesis.
* Deegan, C., Unerman, J. (2006), Financial Accounting Theory, Maidenhead:McGraw-HillEducation.
* Committee of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC)(2006), “Why Sustainability Counts for Professional Accountants in Business “Information Paper, August 2006.
* Turker D. (2009), Measuring CorporateSocial Responsibility: A Scale Development Study Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4), 411-27.
* Wayne Visser(2012) “The Age of Responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the New DNA of Business” , Publisher: Wiley, ISBN: 978-0-470-68857-1.
* Visser.W (2012) ,” The Age of Responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the New DNA of Business “ , John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
* Jones, T.C. and Dugdale, D. (2020), “The concept of an accounting regime”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting , Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 35-63.
* Conrad, L. (2020), “A structuration analysis of accounting systems and systems of accountability in the privatised gas industry”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting , Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 1-26.
* Ahrens, T. and Chapman, C.S. (2019), “Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: a field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain”,Contemporary Accounting Research,Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 271-301.
_||_