The Role of Scientific-Technology Literacy of Educational Leaders in Increasing the Components of Soft Skill

Subject Areas : Education

Ali Khalegkhah ¹ , habibeh najafi ²

1 - university of mohaghegh ardabili
2 - university of ardabili mohaghrgh

Received: 2019-02-16 Accepted : 2021-04-26 Published : 2021-02-19

Keywords: Soft Skills, Scientific Literacy, Technology Literacy, Educational Leaders,

Abstract :

Background: Administrator soft skills are very useful for organization effective and self-efficacy. School administrators need to complete their formal and informal skills in relation to staff and community. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of educational managers' scientific-technology literacy in increasing the soft skills components. Method: The research is applied in terms of purpose, and in terms of data collection, it is a field-library type and a correlation type (regression) method. The statistical population includes 200 schoolchildren in all cities of Ardabil. The sample size was estimated by the Krejci-Morgan formula of 80 people. Sampling was carried out using simple random sampling. The instrument used in this research is a standard questionnaire - Miller scientific-technology literacy Questionnaire (2006) and a Khalegkhah and Najafi researcher made questionnaire (2018) of soft skills. The validity of the tools was verified by confirmatory factor analysis and their reliability with Cronbach's alpha coefficient (internal consistency). Data was analyzed by using of Spss20 software. Results: The results of the findings showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between scientific literacy and the soft skills of educational managers (r = 0.56; p < 0.05); Also, technology literacy has a positive and significant relationship with soft skills of educational managers (r = 0.55, p < 0.05). The results of simultaneous regression showed that scientific-technology literacy can explain and predict about % 67 of soft skills changes in educational managers (Adj = 0.134; r = 0.820; R2 = 0.672) that The highest is the scientific literacy with a beta coefficient of 0.39 (β = 0.39). Conclusion: Soft skills of managers are needed more than hard and formal skills in today's changing and competitive world and educational managers should pay special attention to the ways to increase it.

References:

 

lBadriyan.A.(2013). Study of the Components of Different Types of Academic Literacy in the Basic Science Education of  Different Educational Courses, Research Report, Research and Planning rganization,Ministry of Education. (in persian).

lBerko.E.(2013). Communication Management, Translation of Arabs and Izadi, Tehran: Office of Cultural Research. (in persian).

lDergy.P.(2014). Forty Says About Business Leadership and Leadership, Tehran: Marketing Publishing. (in persian).

 

lFriedman.T.L .(2006). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New  York: Farr,Straus and Giroux.

 

lGasemi.A.(2006). Study of the Information Literacy Status of Graduate Students and Drafting Informational Literacy Standards for them in accordance with the four National Development Papers of Iran, Ph.D. in Library and Information Science, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (in persian).

 

lGliga. L .(2002). Standarde profesionale pentru profesia didactic a,Bucuresti: Polsib SA.

 

lJeevanantham. L. S. (2005). Why Teach Critical Thinking? Africa Education Review; 2(1): 118-129.

 

lJenkins .E.W .(2014). Scientific and technological literacy: Meanings and rationales; In E. W. Jenkins (Ed.); Innovations in science and technology.

 

lKatz.R.L .(1974). Skill of an effective administrators; Harvard Business Review; 52(5): 90-102.

 

lKhaleghkhah.A; Najafi.H .(2017). Designing a soft skills measurement tool for exploratory blended learning managers, A new approach to educational management, 9 (1): 25-44 . (in persian).

 

lLantz.A&  Brage.C .(2006). Towards a Learning Society– Exploring the  Challenge of Applied Information Literacy through Reality-Based Scenarios,  ITALICS. 5 (1).                                         

lLaugksch.R. C .(2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview;  Journal of Science   Education 84 (1): 71-94.

 

lMason,R; Rennie,F .(2008). E-learning and Social Networking Handbook Resources for   Higher Education. London: Routledge.

 

lMirsepasy.N .(2011). The Need for Strengthening Management Skills, Journal of Management Studies, (8) 13: 23-34. (in persian).

 

lMyburgh. S .(2009). The Convergence of Information Technology & Information Management. Information Management Journal, 3(7): 221-310.

 

lNazary.M.(2011). Information Literacy, Tehran: Iran Information and Documentation Center. (in persian).

 

lNiromand.P; Ranjbar.M.(2010).  The role of competency and skill training in the development of technology capabilities of technology companies Bonyan, 4th National Conference on Technology Management,Tehran: Iran Technology Management Association. (in persian).

 

lParirokh.M .(2007). Teaching Information Literacy, Concepts, Methods and Programs, Tehran: Librarian. (in persian).

 

lPaterson,J .(2010). Do Teams Work? Leadership for Student Activities; National Association of Secondary School Principals Edition.Reston; 39(4): 9-12.

 

lPrasek. P. (2011). Value, book, learning development for 21st Century students. Bangkok: Sodsri-saridwong Foundation.

 

lPurcell. K;  Rainie. L; Heaps. A; Buchanan. J; Friedrich.L; Jacklin.A; et al .(2012). How Teens Do Research in the Digital World: Pew Reseacrh Center; 13(5): 14-32.

 

lRoberts.D .(2007). Scientific literacy/Science literacy. In S. K. Abell, & N. G.Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate; 729-780.

 

lSeidshoja.NS.(2006). Requirement of Banking Trade Managers in Management Triple Skills to Develop Their Curriculum, Master's Thesis, Shahid Beheshti University of Tehran. (in persian).

 

lShakir.R .(2009). Soft Skills at the Malaysian Institutes of Higher Learning; Asia Pacific Educ; 10(3): 309-315.

 

lShamos.M. H .(2010). The Myth of Scientific Literacy; New Brunswick; NJ: Rutgers  University Press.

 

lSimon.S & Collins.S .(2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its   implications; International journal of science education; 25(3): 1049-1079.

 

lStarkey.L .(2011). Evaluating learning in the 21 st century: a digital age learning matrix.  Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20 (1): 19-39.

 

lTaghloff.D .(2001). Seeds of consensus the potential role for information and communication technologiesin development:empowering, appropriateness and   easuring if needs really get met.

 

lTang.K.N .(2012). Soft skills development for higher education institute; Paper presented for special seminar; Faculty of Education; Khon Kaen Univerity.

 

lTrilling.B;  Fadel.C .(2009). 21st Century Skill Learning for Life in our Time; New York: John Wiley; Son.

UNESCO .(1994). The Project 2000+ Declaration: The Way Forward; UNESCO, Paris.

 

lWallapha.A .(2012). Document for organizational development; Educational Administration; Faculty of Education; Khon Kaen University.

 

lWenning.C. (2006). Assessing nature-of-science literacy as one component of scientific  literacy; Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online; 3(4): 3-14.

 

lWijan.P .(2012). How to develop learning for the 21st Century Students. Bangkok: Sodsri-saridwong Foundation.

 

lWilaipan.W .(2013). Staff development; The Second Issue of Palatipat Journal; 13(2):22-37.