Identification and explanation of factors affecting the indifference of employees in sports organizations of Razavi Khorasan province
Subject Areas : Sport Management
Mohammad Javad Rasekhi
1
,
Ehsan Asadollahi
2
*
,
Seyed mohammad hosein Hoseini ravesh
3
,
مهدی اصفهانی
4
1 - Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Physical Education, Mashhad branch, Islamic Azad university, Mashhad, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education, Mashhad branch, Islamic azad university, Mashhad, Iran.
3 - Department of Physical Education, Mashhad branch, Islamic azad university, Mashhad, Iran.
4 - عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه بینالمللی امام رضا (ع) مشهد، مشهد، ایران
Keywords: Foundation Data Theory, Employee Indifference, Sports Organizations, Sports and Youth Administration, Sports Boards.,
Abstract :
Objective: The purpose of the present study was to identify and explain the factors affecting the indifference of employees in sports organizations in Razavi Khorasan Province.
Methods: In terms of the purpose of the research, this research is applied from the perspective of the research method, qualitative type and inductive approach (part to whole) and the dominant paradigm of the current research is the interpretive-constructive paradigm. Foundation data theory and Strauss Corbin's approach were used to identify factors affecting the indifference of sports organization employees in Razavi Khorasan Province. The statistical population of the research was all the experts of the country's sports organizations (Ministry of Sports and Youth, sports federations and university professors) who have an opinion on the issue of organizational behavior of employees. The number of samples in this research was selected using the snowball method and a total of 17 were done.
Results: Using Straus Corbin's paradigm model, it was found that three factors as causal conditions; Six factors play a role as background conditions and four factors as intervening conditions of indifference of sports organization employees. Also, there are four main structures and strategies and five main consequences for the indifference of sports organization employees.
Conclusions: In a general conclusion, it can be said that in sports organizations, organizational responsibilities and tasks are presented to people in a group format, in this case, both individual factors are solved to some extent and more communication is formed between people. And the possibility of indifference of the organization decreases.
1. Rahimi, Hamid; Khayami, Faezeh. (2018). Organizational indifference among teachers in Kashan city: antecedents and consequences. School management scientific research quarterly. 7(2):1-23. [In Persian]
2. Abdulahi Gadello, R. Kashif, S M. (2018). Investigating the relationship between the components of silence and organizational indifference with organizational procrastination of physical education teachers. Journal of Human Resource Management in Sports. 7(1):150-137. [In Persian]
3. Abdulahi, M. Mousavi, M. Ahmadi, A. Amirkhani, A. (2016). Designing and explaining the indifference model of human resources of government organizations in the path of realizing the resistance economy model. Basij Strategic Studies Quarterly. 20(77):207-177. [In Persian]
4. Aghelzadeh v, Soleymani T. (2107). Investigating the Status of Teachers' Organizational Indifference (Case Study: Primary School Teachers in Ardabil City), National Conference on Modern Research in Management, Kazeron.
5. Altionz, M, Cakiroglu, D., And Cops, S. (2013). Effect of talent management on organizational trust: Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences. 99.
6. Anand, A., Dalmasso, A., Vessal, S. R., Parameswar, N., Rajasekar, J., & Dhal, M. (2023). The effect of job security, insecurity, and burnout on employee organizational commitment. Journal of Business Research, 162, 113843.
7. Atalay, M. O., Aydemir, P., & Acuner, T. (2022). The influence of emotional exhaustion on organizational cynicism: The sequential mediating effect of organizational identification and trust in organization. Sage Open, 12(2), 21582440221093343.
8. Bormann, K. C., & Rowold, J. (2016). Ethical leadership’s potential and boundaries in organizational change: A moderated mediation model of employee silence. German Journal of Human Resource Management. 30(3-4):225–245.
9. Corkin, D. M., Yu, S. L., Wolters, C. A., & Wiesner, M. (2014). The role of the college classroom climate on academic procrastination. Journal of Learning and Individual Differences. 32: 294–303.
10. De Clercq, D., Kundi, Y. M., Sardar, S., & Shahid, S. (2021). Perceived organizational injustice and counterproductive work behaviours: mediated by organizational identification, moderated by discretionary human resource practices. Personnel Review, 50(7/8), 1545-1565.
11. Ghanbari, Siros and Heydari Sureshjani Nasrin. (2018). Conceptualization and examination of antecedents and consequences of organizational indifference, the fourth national conference in management, accounting and economics with an emphasis on regional and global marketing, Tehran - Shahid Beheshti University, permanent secretariat of the conference.. [In Persian]
12. Gordon B. Schmidt, Guihyun Park, Jessica Keeney & Sonia Ghumman. (2015). Job apathy: Scale development and initial validation. Journal of Career Assessment. 25( 3):484-501.
13. Hosseiniyan, Nahida. Yari Qoli, Behod. Yarmohammadzadeh, Payman. (2017). The mediating role of organizational moral climate in the relationship between organizational justice and organizational silence and indifference of teachers. Journal of management on training organizations. 7(1):103-133. [In Persian]
14. Jahanshahi, M. (2018). Organizational indifference: Examining signs, causes and consequences by grounded theory method, 8th International Management Conference, Tehran, Ariana Research Group. [In Persian]
15. Keefo, L. (2011). Investigating factors of organizational indeference, Journal of Human Resources management, 13(18).
16. Lin, X., & Du, J. (2023). What happens when leader is ambivalent and employee is indifferent? A moderated mediation model of LMX ambivalence and employee creativity. Chinese Management Studies, 18(2), 307-323.
17. Liu, X. L., Lu, J. G., Zhang, H., & Cai, Y. (2021). Helping the organization but hurting yourself: How employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior predicts work-to-life conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 167, 88-100.
18. McCarthy, I. P., Hannah, D., Pitt, L. F., & McCarthy, J. M. (2020). Confronting indifference toward truth: Dealing with workplace bullshit. Business Horizons, 63(3), 253-263.
19. Moradi, M. Hamidi, H. Alexandria, A. (2019). Analyzing the relationship between organizational indifference, organizational justice and organizational belonging among librarians and employees of the organization of libraries,
museums and the Astan Quds Razavi Document Center. Theory of librarianship and information. 23(1):5-28. [In Persian] 20. Ozsahin, M., & Yurur, S. (2019). Does Organizational Justice Increase or Decrease Organizational Dissent? Research Journal of Business and Management. 6(1):1-8.
21. Rahimi, H. Khayami, F. (2018). Organizational indifference among teachers in Kashan city: antecedents and consequences. School management scientific research quarterly. 7(2): -23. [In Persian]
22. Shokri, Hatem. Samadi, Abbas. (2018). The role of indifference of employees to the organization on organizational growth (case study: social insurance fund of farmers, villagers and nomads). Quarterly journal of new research approaches
in management and accounting. 3(18):86-75. [In Persian] 23. Turkzadeh, Jafar; Salimi, Qasim; Sangi, Forough. (2015). Reducing organizational indifference in the light of developing an empowering organizational structure. Management research in Iran. 20(3):53-83. [In Persian]
24. Yazıcı, H., & Bulut, R. (2015). Investigation into the academic procrastination of teacher candidates’ social studies with regard to their personality traits. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 174:2270-2277.
25. Zhang, Y., & Frenkel, S. (2018). Employee Indifference and Inaction against Abusive Supervision. Employee Relations. 40(6):981-998.