Formation E-Participation Development Model in Iran
Subject Areas : Public Policy In AdministrationMozhgan Mohaimani 1 , Hassan Givarian 2 , Ehsan Sadeh 3 , Syrus Tadbiri 4
1 - 1. Ph.D. Student , Management Department, Faculty of Humanities, Saveh branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran
2 - Associate Prof. Management Department, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran,
3 - Assistant Prof, Management Department, Faculty of Humanities, Saveh branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran
4 - Assistant Prof, Management Department, Faculty of Humanities, Saveh branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran
Keywords: E-Governance, E-government, Iran horizon 2025, e-participation,
Abstract :
Background: ICT can change the political landscape by creating citizens' participation in the governance process. Therefore, electronic participation has become an important point of this process and specifically refers to a digital divide focusing on equal accessibility of participants. In Iran horizon 2025 and development programs is stated that Iran should be number one among countries in this area. Objective: The main purpose of the present research is to discover, identify the dimensions and factors affecting e-participation in Iran Method: According to the subject, the mix method of research was carried out through completing a checklist on the agenda with 6 scientific and executive experts who had been selected through purposive sampling method. Focus group interview was conducted and the results of the interview was analyzed based on the classical content analysis technique. Measurement tools of quantitative part were included the questionnaire and the Likert scale was used. Data were analyzed through structural equity modeling (SEM), confirmatory factor analysis and path analysis by SPSS and Lisrel. Results: According to the research findings, 250 open codes were extracted from focus group interview, local and international literature. Among these concepts, 17 sub categories and 10 major categories were identified. Conclusion: The research result is an efficient model for the development of eparticipation, through the application of the factors identified in the process of policymaking in the field of ICT and improving the quality of communication between policy makers and citizens can improve the country's ranking in this index and help achieve the goal of the Iran horizon 2025
_||_
Alathur, S; Ilavarasan, Gupta, M. (2014). Determinants of citizens’ electronic participation: insights from India. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8 (3), 447-472.
Bataineh, L; Abu-Shanab, E. (2016). How perceptions of E-participation levels influence the intention to use E-government websites. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 315-334
Danaeifard, H, (1392), Qualitative research strategies: a reflection on data foundation theorizing. Management Thought, First Year, Second Issue - Fall and Winter. 69 – 76
Hafeznia, M. (1383), Introduction to Research Methodology in Humanities, 16th Edition, Tehran, Samat Publications.
Holloway, I. & Wheeler, S. (2002), Qualitative Research for Nurses, 2nd Edit. Oxford, Black Well Science.
Khaki, gh, (1387), Research method with a dissertation approach, Islamic Azad University.
Martiez López, M., Sicilia, M., 2013. How WOM marketing contributes to new product adoption: testing competitive communication strategies. Eur. J. Mark. 47, 1089–1114
Memarzadeh, Gh ; Faghihi, M. (1393), E-government. Tehran.
Naranjo-Zolotov, M; Oliveira, T; Casteleyn, S; Irani, Z. (2019) Continuous usage of e-participation: The role of the sense of virtual community. Government Information Quarterly 36 (2019) 536–545
Naranjo-Zolotov, M; Oliveira, T; Cruz-Jesus. F; Martins, J; Gonçalves, R; Branco, F; Xavier. N. (2019) Examining social capital and individual motivators to explain the adoption of online citizen participation. Future Generation Computer Systems 92 302–311
Oni, A; Ayo, C; Oni, S; Mbarika, V. (2016). Strategic framework for e-democracy development and sustainability. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy,10 (3):457-477.
Panopoulou, E; Tambouris, E; Tarabanis, K. (2009). eParticipation initiatives: How is Europe progressing?. European Journal of ePractice,7, 15-26.
Prannejad, A; Janssen, M; Rezaei, J. (2019). Towards a balanced E-Participation Index: Integrating government and society perspectives. Government Information Quarterly.
Royo, S; Yetano, A; Acerete, B. (2013). E-Participation and Environmental Protection: Are Local Governments Really Committed? Public Administration Review, 74 (1), 87–98.
Royo, S; Yetano, A; Acerete, B. (2014). Perceptions About the Effectiveness of E-Participation: A Multi stakeholder Perspective, Public Administration and Information Technology, Measuring E-government Efficiency,Volume 5, pp 257-275
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students.
Sobaci, Z. (2010). What the Turkish parliamentary web site offers to citizens in terms of e-participation: A content analysis. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age, 15 (3), 227-241
Strauss, A, Corbin, J. (1394) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and stages of production of grounded theory. Translation: Ebrahim Afshar. Tehran
United Nations Development Program (2002). Human Development Report, New York: Oxford University Press.
United nations e-government survey (2008). From e-government to connected governance.
United nations e-government survey (2010). Leveraging e-government at the time of financial and economics’ crisis.
United nations e-government survey (2012). E-government for the people.
United nations e-government survey (2014). E-government for the future we want.
United nations e-government survey (2016). E-government in support of sustainable development