Identification, Prioritization, and Analysis of Stakeholders of Vanak Tourism Area Based on the Cooperation-threat Dual Potential and SAW Method

Subject Areas :

Mohsen Cheshmberah ¹ , Samaneh Asefi ² , Alireza Mansoorian ³

1 - Faculty member, Industrial Engineering Department, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Ms. Industrial Engineering Department, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
3 - Researcher in Industrial Engineering Department, Malek Ashtar University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

Received: 2021-12-12 Accepted : 2022-02-01 Published : 2022-02-20

Keywords: Tourism, identification, Stakeholders, stakeholders analysis, cooperation-threat potential,

Abstract :

Identifying and analyzing tourism stakeholders and formulating effective strategies is one of the most important subjects in the success of tourism programs. The focus of this article is on identifying and analyzing the stakeholders of tourism in the Vanak region. In this regard, the Freeman model has been used to identify the stakeholders. For this purpose, a questionnaire was distributed among 20 experts in the region and after collecting and analyzing the collected data, a list of stakeholders (by types) and the salient expectations of each group were provided. Based on the cooperation-threat dual potential stakeholders were placed in the positioning matrix based on which one of the four strategies was proposed. To prioritize the stakeholders in each of the four areas, index A has been used as a weighted sum of the three criteria of power, legitimacy, and urgency. In this regard, the multi-criteria SAW method based on seven steps has been used.  

References:

 

1. آصفی، س. 1399. ارایه مدلی جهت برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی گردشگری پایدار (مطالعه موردی: منطقه ونک شهرستان سمیرم). پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ‌ارشد، دانشگاه صنعتی مالک اشتر. 172 صفحه.


2. ابطحی فروشانی، ز. 1394. آشنایی با فرایند تحلیل ذی‌نفعان کلیدی در پروژه‌های نفت و گاز در ایران. ماهنامه اکتشاف و تولید نفت و گاز، 95(131): 39-33.


3. اکبریان رونیزی، س، بدری، ع. 1394. تحلیل درک ذی‌نفعان از آثار و پیامدهای توسعه گردشگری در نواحی روستایی نمونه موردی: منطقه لواسانات. نشریه جغرافیا و توسعه، 13(38): 62-47.


4. بهادرستانی، ا، طالبی، ه، قلعه نوی، م. 1395. اولویت بندی ذینفعان کلیدی در مگاپروژه‌های ساخت با تکنیک AHP-Fuzzy (مطالعه موردی : قطار شهری مشهد). همایش بین‌المللی اقتصاد شهری، 42-31.


5. بهادرستانی، ا، قلعه‌نوی، م، مطهری فریمانی، ن. 1397. طراحی مدل انتظارات ذی‌نفعان کلیدی در پروژه‌های احداث خطوط مترو: مورد مطالعه پروژه ساخت خطوط قطار شهری مشهد. نشریه مهندسی عمران امیرکبیر، 50(1): 242-227.


6. ضرغام بروجنی، ح، ایوبی یزدی، ح، اکبرپور، ت. 1390. مشارکت ذی‌نفعان در برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه گردشگری، جایگاه، مدیریت و چالشها. همایش مدیریت و توسعه گردشگری، چالشها و راهکارها، 16-1.


7. قوامی، ا، ابوالحسنی، ع، موسوی، س. ارزیابی و تحلیل خواسته‌ها و انتظارات ذی‌نفعان در راستای صیانت از حقوق شهروندی(شرکت پایانه‌های نفتی ایران). دوازدهمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی مدیریت، تهران، 1397، 74-69.


8. همتی، م، آمانج رسولی، م. 1395. ذی‌نفعان و نوع نگاه آن‌ها به اثرات گردشگری(مطالعه موردی:اورامان تخت). فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی جغرافیا(برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای)، 7(11): 84-69.


9. Afshari, A., Mojahed, M., & Yusuff, R. 2010. Simple Additive Weighting approach to Personnel Selection problem. Int. J. of Innovation, Management and Technology, 1(5): 511-515


10. Bryson, , Humphrey, H. 2004.What to do when stakeholders matter: stakeholder identification and analysis technique. Public Management Review, 6(1): 21-53.


11. Byrd, E. Stakeholders in Sustainable Tourism Development and their Roles: Applying Stakeholder Theory to Sustainable Tourism Development. Tourism Review, 62(2):6-13


12. Chevalier, J. Buckles, D. A guide to collaborative inquiry and social.Sage Publications.316P.


13. Choi, h., Sirakaya, E. Measuring residents` attitude toward sustainable tourism: Development of sustainable tourism attitude scale. Journal of Travel Research, 43(4): 380-394.


14. Freeman, R. E. 2010. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Perspective. Cambridge University Press. 276P.


15. Friedman, A., Miles, S. 2002. Developing Stakeholder Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39 (1):1-21.


16. Garrod, B., Fyall, A., Leask, A., Reid, E. 2012. Engaging Residents as Stakeholders of the Visitor Attraction. Tourism Management, 33(5): 1159-1173.


17. Getz, D. 1983. Capacity to absorb tourism: Concepts and implications for strategic planning. Annals of tourism Research, 10(2):239-263.


18. Hall, C. 2000. Tourism planning: Policies, processes and relationships. Prentice-Hall. 464P.


19. Inskeep, E. 1991. Tourism Planning: An integrated and sustainable development approach. Van Nostrand Reinhold. 528P.


20. Jepsen, A., Eskerod, P. 2008. Stakeholder analysis in projects: Challenges in using current guidelines in the real world. Int. J. of project management. 27(4):335-343


21. Mitchell, R., Agle, B., Wood, D. 1997. Toward a Theory of Stake-holder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Whom and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4):853-886.


22. Pajunen, K. 2011. A “Black Box” of Stakeholder Thinking. Journal of Business Ethics, 96:27–32.


23. Shao, H., Li, S., Xu, L. 2015. Mapping and Analyzing Stakeholders in China’s Essential Drug System by Using a Circular Model: Who We Should Deal with Next?. Value in health regional, 6C: 111–117.


24. Sheehan, L. R., Rithchie, J. R. B. 2005. Destination Stakeholders Exploring Identity and Salience. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(3): 711-734.


25. Slinger, G. 1999. Spanning the gap–the theoretical principles that connect stakeholder policies to business performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 7(2): 136-151.


26. Turker, N. Alaeddinoglu, F. Can, A. S. The role of stakeholders in sustainable tourism development in Safranbolu, Turkey. Int. Conference on Hospitality, Leisure, Sports, and Tourism, Japan, 2016, 415-426


27. Vassallo, M. 2015. The Europeanization of Interest Groups in Malta and Ireland: A Small State Perspective. Springer. 281P.


28. Vos, J., Achterkamp, M. 2006. Stakeholder identification in innovation Projects, Going beyond classification. European Journal of innovation Management, 9(2): 161-178.