Land Use Conflict Analysis with Using the Model of Land Use Conflict Identification Strategy (LUCIS) in Tonekabon County

Subject Areas :

banafsheh pirasteh ¹ (Master of Regional Planning/ Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch)
Mojtaba Rafieian ² (Associate Professor Faculty of Arts and Architecture/ Tarbiat Modares University)
Reza Ahmadian ³ (Assistant Professor Faculty of Arts and Architecture/ Islamic Azad university)

Received: 2015-11-28 Accepted : 2017-11-02 Published : 2017-12-21

Keywords: land use changes, Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM), land use conflicts identification Strategic (LUCIS), Tonekabon city,

Abstract :

In recent decades, rapid changes in land use, especially in coastal areas has been associated with important implications as destruction of natural resources, environmental pollution and … In Tonekabon city, development of physical settlements as a result of rapid population growth, without any planning and environmental considerations lead to the expansion of cities into the vulnerable areas, that if not controlled and correct guidance, will cause destruction of many lands with priority to agricultural lands and their protection will be. The aim of this study was to identify factors and drivers of changes in land use in Tonekabon and also make benefit of Analysis Model of land use conflicts identification Strategic (LUCIS) in determining the user conflicts of the interest area. In this study, the analytical method (Statistical- Spatial) data used in processing and analyzing data using spatial analysis techniques have been combined. After preparing the data layers, weighting and combining them, the results showed that agricultural priority accounted for the largest share in zones without conflict, which was distributed in the western half of the North Strip, on the other hand agricultural- Conservation zones covers over 30 percent of conflict moderate zone and scattered throughout the area. Finally, based on reached results intervention strategies were provided in the framework of an integrated management approach to control and reduce conflict, create compatibility and make Suitability between the Land uses with each other and balance of loaded ground.

References:

 

1. اعتماد، گیتی، (1379)، توسعه شهری و کاربری بهینه زمین، مجموعه مقالات همایش زمین و توسعه شهری، تهران، مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات شهرسازی و معماری.


2. افشار، نگین، (1389)، تحلیل کاربری هوشمند در نواحی با قابلیت توسعه با بهره‌گیری از مدل راهبرد شناسایی تعارضات کاربری‌ها LUCIS (نمونه موردی: منطقه 22 کلان شهر تهران)، کارشناسی ارشد، تهران، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.


3. بریاسولیس، هلن، (1389)، الگوهای تحلیلی تغییر کاربری زمین: رویکردهای نظری و مدل‌سازی، ترجمه مجتبی رفیعیان و مهران محمودی، چاپ اول، تهران، انتشارات آذرخش.


4. پیراسته، بنفشه، (1394)، تحلیل تغییرات کاربری زمین با تأکید بر مدیریت یکپارچه مناطق ساحلی (نمونه موردی شهرستان تنکابن)، کارشناسی ارشد رشته برنامه‌ریزی منطقه‌ای، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی، 218 صفحه.


5. شکوئی، حسین، (1393)، دیدگاه‌های نو در جغرافیای شهری، جلد اول، چاپ هفدهم، تهران، انتشارات سمت.


6. مهندسان مشاور آریا پادشهر، طرح ناحیه‌ای تنکابن رامسر (نقش محیط)،1385.


7. مهندسین مشاور مـآب، (۱۳۸۸)، گزارش برآیند مطالعات مدیریت یکپارچه مناطق ساحلی کشور، سازمان بنادر و دریانوردی، تهران.

 

1. 8.   Braimoh, K. L., Onishi, T., (2007). Spatial Determinants of Urban Land Use Change in Lagos, Nigeria. Land Use Policy, 24, 502-515.


2. Brown Greg, Kyttä Marketta, (2014), "Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research", journal Applied Geography, 46, 122- 136 ,Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd., England.


3. Brown Greg, Raymond Christopher M., (2014), "Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping", journal Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 196- 208 ,Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd., England.


4. Carr Margaret. H & Zwick Paul. D, (2006), Smart Land– Use Analysis (The LUCIS Model), ESRI Press, Redlands, California.


5. David Faucett., (2013), Southwest Missouri Council of Governments in Cooperation with the Taney County, Missouri Planning and Zoning Department, Taney County Land Use Suitability Conflict Analysis, January.


6. Kivell, Philip, (1993), "Land and the city: Patterns and processes of urban change", Published by Routledge, London, Available on line at: http//:books.google.com


7. Lambin, E. F. and Geist, H. J., Eds. (2006). Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: Local Processes and Global Impacts. IGBP Series. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. In: R. J. Aspinall, M. J. Hill. Land use change: science, policy and management. NewYork: CRC Press, pp. 3-15.


8. Meyer, W.B. and B.L. Turner, II, eds. (1995). Changes in Land Use and Land Cover: A Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


9. Moser, S.C. (1996). "A Partial Instructional Module on Global and Regional Land Use/Cover Change: Assessing the Data and Searching for General Relationships." Geojournal39(3): 241-283.


10. Noronha vaz, E. de, Nijkamp, P., Painho, M., Caetano, M. (2012). A Multi Scenario Forecast of Urban Change: A Study of Urban Growth in the Algarve. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104, 201-211.


11. Petrov, L. O. ,Lavalle, C., Kasanko, M. (2009). Urban land use scenarios for a rourist region in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92, 10-23.


12. Shen, Y., ( 2009), The social and environmental costs associated with water management practices in state environmental protection projects in Xinjiang, China, Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 970-980.


13. Tan, M., Li, X., Xie, H., Lu, C. (2005). Urban land expansion and arable land loss in China-a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region. Land Use Policy, 22, 187-196.


14. Turner, B.L. II, D. Skole, S. Sanderson, G. Fischer, L. Fresco, and R. Leemans. (1995). Land-Use and Land-Cover Change; Science/Research Plan. IGBP Report No.35, HDP Report No.7. IGBP and HDP, Stockholm and Geneva.


15. Verburg P. H., Veldkamp A. (2001). The Role of Spatially Explicit Models in Land Use Change Research: a Case Study for Cropping Patterns in China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 85, 177-190.


16. von der Dunk Andreas; Grêt-Regamey Adrienne; Dalang Thomas; Hersperger Anna M., (2011), "Defining a typology of peri-urban land-use conflicts – A case study from Switzerland", journal Landscape and Urban Planning, 101, 149- 156 ,Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd., England.


17. White R. and Engelen G., (2000). High-resolution integrated modeling of the spatial dynamics of urban and regional systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24, 383–400.


18. Zheng, X. Q., Zhao, L., Xiang, W. W., Li, X., Lv, L., Yong, X. (2012). A Coupled Model for Simulating Spatio-temporal Dynamics of Land Use Change: A Case Study in Changqing China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 106, 51-56.