Legal protection capacities in regional courts of religious tourists.

Subject Areas : Recent Developments in public law

Alireza Keshtkar ¹ (Doctoral Student of International Law Major, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran)
Masoud Raei Dehaqi ² (Full Professor, Department of Law, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran)
Manouchehr Tavasolli Naeini ³ (Associate Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran)

Received: 2023-05-15 Accepted : 2023-06-18 Published : 2023-12-22

Keywords: Regional Courts, religious tourist, protection capacities,

Abstract :

One of the types of tourism is religious tourism, which has a special place for various reasons. Because religious tourism, considering that there are different opinions and sometimes even objections against it, which originates from their religious beliefs, so that in addition to their money, it also puts their lives at risk..Now, the purpose of this research is to examine the existing legal capacities and the capabilities that prevail in the rules and regulations of the regional courts. It should be determined whether it is possible to support religious tourists by submitting legal petitions or submitting criminal complaints or not? In this article, in order to achieve the goal, a descriptive analytical research method has been used. Finally, the results of this research showed by stating and explaining the rules and regulations governing the regional courts. that religious tourists or their statesmen, by using their legal and criminal capacities in the form of rules and regulations governing regional courts, are able to not only reduce many political and economic tensions in the world, Rather, they should provide the means to restore the violated rights and also prevent the repetition of similar issues in the future.

References:

_|1 -ایوانز، گ؛ نونام، ج. (1381 .)فرهنگ روابط بین الملل، ترجمه حمیرا مشیرزاده و حسین شریفی طراز کوهی،
تهران: نشر میزان.
2 -پروین خ. )13۷8 .)حقوق بشر و تأثیر آن بر حاکمیت ملی دولت ها، فصلنامه حقوق، 38(4 :)125-13۷.
3 -رهایی، س. )1389 .)آزادی دینی از منظر حقوق بین الملل با نگاهی به رهیافت اسالمی، انتشارات دانشگاه
مفید.
4 -ریتزر ج. )13۷4 ،)نظریه جامعه شناسی در دوران معاصر، ترجمه محسن ثالثی، تهران: انتشارات علمی.
فصلنامه دستاوردهای نوین در حقوق عمومی، سال دوم، شماره هشتم، زمستان1402
63
5 -شمسی، ا. )1390 .)تعهدات حقوقی بینالمللی اروپا درخصوص آزادی حجاب. فصلنامه سیاست خارجی،
.14۷-1۷0 :)1(25
۶ -ظریف، م. )13۷8 .)اساسنامه دیوان بین المللی کیفری و الحاق ایران به آن در دیوان کیفری بین المللی و
جمهوری اسالمی ایران، به اهتمام اسحاق آل حبیب، دفتر مطالعات سیاسی وبین المللی.
۷ -غریبه، ع. )1390 .)حق گردشگری و حقوق عمومی گردشگران خارجی، فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی فضای
.185-208 :)35(11 ،جغرافیایی
8 -فلیپ، ل. )138۶ .)نهادها و سازوکارهای منطقهای حمایت از حقوق بشر. مترجمان: زمانی ق، وکیل ا. و عسکر
پ. چاپ اول. تهران: مؤسسه مطالعات و پژوهش های حقوقی شهر دانش.
9 -گالن، گ. )13۷9 .)درآمدی بر حقوق بین الملل عمومی، ترجمه محمدحسین حافظیان، تهران: نشر میزان.
1- Ajit, SK. (2004). Quest For Good Governance, Contribution Find Potential Of
Religious Institutions As Stakeholders, Presented At “The Quest For Good Governance”
Organized By The Monash Governance Research Unit & Monash Institute For The Study
Of Global Movements.
2- Akeherst, M. (1998). A Modern Introduction to International Law. 6th Edition, New
York: London, Unwin Hyman.
3- Amir Ramadhani V. (2015). United Republic of Tanzania, Application. No.010/2015.
4- Bachand, F. (2005). The Proof Of Foreign Normative Factswhich. Influence Domestic
Rules. Sgood Hall Law Journal, 43(3): 26-38.
5- Baderin, M. & Manisuli, S. (2010). International Human Rights Law: Six Decades
After -The UDHR And Beyond, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd, UK.
6- Bornkamm, PC. (2012). State Immunity Against Claims Arising From War Crimes:
Thejudgment Of The International Court Of Justice In Jurisdictional Immunities Of The
State. German Law Journal, 13(6): 45-58.
7- Claire, M. (2005). Terrorism as a State of Emergency in International Law” (paper
presented atThe Anzsil 2005 Conference, Canberra.
فصلنامه دستاوردهای نوین در حقوق عمومی، سال دوم، شماره هشتم، زمستان1402
64
8- Fuhrmann, W. (2000). Perspectives on Religious Freedom from theVantage Point of
the European Court of Human Rights, Bighamr YoungUniversity Law Review, 2(3): 12-
34.
9- Julia, H. (2002). The African court on human and people’s rights, the African charter
on human and peoples rights the system of practice.
10- Kristen, E. (2013). The Role of Lex Specialis in the Articles on the Responsibility of
International Organizations, in: Maurizio Ragazzi (ed),Responsibility of International
Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
11- Mariam, K. & Ousmane Diabate, V. (2016). Republic of Mali, Application.
No.040/2016.
12- Memoli V. (2017). Argentina: Reparations Declared Completed. Chile: Reparations
Carried out.
13- O'Donnell, T. (1982). The Margin Ofappreciation Doctrine: Standards in The
Jurisprudence of The European Court of Humanrights. Humanrights Quarterly, 4(4): 42-
56.
14- Olmedo Bustos, V. (2001). The Case of Ultima Tentacion De Cristo. Chile:
Reparations Carried out.
15- Shelton, D. (2005). Remedies In International Human Rights Law. Oxford University
Press.|_