Assessment of genetic variability in advanced lines of winter rapeseed
Subject Areas : Agroecology JournalLeili Alizadeh 1 , bahram alizadeh 2 , farzad javidfar 3 , farookh darvish 4
1 - M.Sc. in Plant Breeding, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University,
2 - Assistant Prof., Oilseeds Research Department, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII), Karaj-Iran
3 - Assistant Prof., Oilseeds Research Department, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII), Karaj-Iran
4 - Professor in Plant Breeding, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University,
Keywords: yield, Broad sense heritability, Components of yield, Genetic variance, Rapesees,
Abstract :
In order to study the genetic variation, identification and selection of superior rapeseed lines in a F4 generation, 20 advanced lines were examined using a randomized complete block design with three replications in the field of Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII), Karaj in 2008-2009. Results of analysis of variance showed that there were significant differences between genotypes for the number of days to initiating and terminating of flowering, number of days to ripening, main stem length, height of first branch from ground surface, main pod length, 1000 seed weight, oil content, seed and oil yield, plant height, number of primary branches, number of pods per branch and per plant. Number of days to beginning of flowering and ripening, 1000 seed weight with 98.27, 92.52 and 91.73 grams had the highest values for broad sense heritability, respectively. The traits like number like of pods per branch and per plant with 23.13 and 16.72 had the highest values for genetic coefficient of variation (GCV). Comparison of mean seed yield showed that the genotypes L1, L9 and Zarfam with the yield values of 3.49, 3.34 and 3.13 t/ha had the highest performance among the examined genotypes, respectively. Correlation among the measured traits showed that oil yield had a positive and significant correlation with seed yield at 1% of probability level and the traits of oil percent and the secondary pod length showed negative and significant correlation with seed yield at the %10 of probability level. Based on cluster analysis, genotypes were assigned into three distinct groups. One of the resulting clusters consisted of high yielding lines that would be suitable for selection of superior and high yielding rapeseed varieties.
Ahmadi MR (1991) Investigation of genetic variability in synthetic rapeseed B. napus L. var Oleifera. Iranian Agricultural Science 21(3): 42-53. [In Persian with English Abstract].
Ahmadi MR (1996) Rapeseed breeding. Extension program Bureau, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO). [In Persian with English Abstract].
Akbar M, Mahmood T, Yaqub M, Anvar M, Ali M, Iqbal N (2003) Variability, correlation and path coefficient studies in summer mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Asian Journal of Plant Science 2(9): 696-698.
Alizadeh B, Tarinejad AR (2010) Application of MSTATC software in statistical analysis. 2nd Edition. Setoodeh Pub. Tabriz. [In Persian with English Abstract].
Allen EJ, Morgan DG (1975) A quantitative comparison of the growth, development and yield of different varieties of oilseed rape. Journal of Agricultural Science 85: 159-74.
Amiri Oghan H, Faraji A, Behmaram R, Arab Gh, Seyf Amiri S (2001) Yield stability of rapeseed genotypes in Caspian Sea coasts regions. Rapeseed Research Results. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII), Karaj. [In Persian with English Abstract].
Azizi M, Soltani A, Khavari Khorasani S (1997) Rapeseed. Jahad Daneshgahi Pub. Mashhad. [In Persian with English Abstract].
Karimi M (2009) Investigation of genetic variability in advanced winter lines of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) regarding seed yield and agronomic traits at Karaj region. MS dissertation in plant breeding. Islamic Azad University, Ardabil Branch. [In Persian with English Abstract].
Khan A, Khan MI, Riaz S (2000) Correlation and path coefficient analysis contributing parameters in Brassica napus. Pakistan Agricultural Research 16(2): 127-130.
Lionneton E, Aubert G, Ochatt S, Merah O (2004) Genetic analysis of agronomic and quality traits in mustard (Brassica juncea). Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 109: 792-799.
Mendham NJ, Russell J, Buzza GC (1984) The contribution of seed survival to yield in new Australian cultivars of oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Journal Agricultural Science. Cambridge 103: 303-316.
Mir Moosavi S (2003) Investigation of genetic correlation between seed yield, oil percent and protein content with some important agronomic traits in rapeseed using path analysis. MS dissertation in Plant Breeding. Faculty of Agriculture, Tehran University. [In Persian with English Abstract].
Özer H, Oral E, Dogru Ü (1999) Relationships between yield and yield components on currently improved spring rapeseed cultivars. Tyrkish Journal Agricultural Forestry 23: 603-607.
Rashidifar J, Dehghani H, Alizadeh B, Khodadadi M (2010) Classification of some winter rapeseed cultivars using cluster analysis and discriminant function analysis. 11th Iranian Congress of Agronomy and Plant Breeding Sciences. 2-4 Mordad 1389. Institute of Environmental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran. [In Persian with English Abstract].
Roodi D, Rahmanpour S, Javidfar F (2003) Rapeseed cultivation. Seed and Plant Improvement Institute. Karaj. [In Persian with English Abstract].
Thurling N (1974) Morphophysiological determinants of yield in rapeseed (Brassica campestris and Brassica napus). Australian Journal Agricultural Research 25: 711-721.
Toliyat Abolhasani M (1996) Effects if density and planting pattern on agronomic and quality traits of winter rapeseed in Mashhad region. MS dissertation in plant breeding. Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. Iran. [In Persian with English Abstract].
Triboi-Blondel AM (1986) Some observations on the yield components of winter rape. Bulletin CETIOM no. 93.
Zhang G, Zhoui W (2006) Genetic analyses of agronomic and seed quality traits of synthetic oilseed Brassica napus produced from interspecific hybridization of B. campestris and B. oleracea. Journal Genetics. 85: 45-51.
_||_