Peer Review Process Policy: Double Blind
The peer review process is used to objectively assess the quality of scientific work. This system, which is considered as an advantage for journals, can guarantee the validity, reliability and originality of scientific articles. Although this process may take longer, it is essential for scholarly and academic publishing.
Articles will be reviewed to see how well they match other published manuscripts. Reviewers are requested to report any errors or instances of plagiarism in the manuscripts.
The maximum standard length of the review period in this journal of sociological strategic studies in sports is about 12 weeks and the minimum period is about 4 weeks. It should be noted that in a few cases, this period may be longer or sometimes even shorter due to various reasons, including rapid or delayed feedback from authors or reviewers, cancellation of the review process, inappropriate responses by authors to comments or corrections and journal guidelines.
