The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to investigate the impact of technology-integrated multiple intelligences instruction on vocabulary learning and burnout of English language learners at a private primary school in Kerman. Over 6 months, two groups of 30 learners (15 students in two intact classrooms) were exposed to two forms of multiple intelligences instruction: the traditional and technology-integrated ones. The instruction was based on designing tasks to activate all intelligences in both groups. In the control group, participants received MI instruction from the teacher using classroom facilities with no use of technology. In the experimental group, participants received MI instruction through computer tools. Both groups received 24-week vocabulary training at a 30-minute interval at the beginning of each conversation class. Pre-tests and post-tests were used to measure learners’ improvements in vocabulary development and burnout (Khani et al., 2017). To analyze the data, One-Way ANCOVA was used to answer the research questions. The results revealed that the learners involved in the technology-integrated classroom proved superior compared to the traditional group in their English vocabulary and burnout. The findings suggest that nonhuman mediators (technology) are more effective than humans, possibly due to their enticing features that enhance learners' motivation and interest. Manuscript profile

The increasingly global nature of our lives provides a suitable foundation for integrating technology into all aspects of human life in general and education in particular. Hence, the focus of the present study was to compare the impact of human and technology-based mediators on vocabulary development and social identity of young English language learners. Over 6 months, two groups of 30 learners (15 students in each group) were exposed to two forms of mediation: the teacher and computer-made mediators. Pre-tests and post-tests were used to measure learners’ improvements in vocabulary development and social identity. A small change in vocabulary development was observed for the teacher-mediated group, but no change was observed in their social identity. However, learners involved in computer-mediated instruction proved superior compared to the teacher-mediated group in both vocabulary development and social identity. It shows that the learners interacting with a computer mediator surpass those interacting with a human-made mediator, namely the teacher. This makes us believe that nonhuman mediators (technology in this study) may prove more effective than human mediators, which may be attributed to the enticing features of technology that can enhance learners' motivation and interest. Manuscript profile