Appropriation-Based Syllabus and Speaking Ability: Evidence from Iranian EFL Context

Subject Areas :

Seyedeh Masoomeh Asaei ¹ (Department of English Language, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran)
Ramin Rahimy ² (Assistant Professor, Department of English Language, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon, Iran)

Received: 2020-12-04 Accepted : 2021-05-24 Published : 2021-12-01

Keywords:

References:

- Araghi, S., Yousefi Oskuee, M., & Salehpour, S. (2014). The effect of pre-teaching extended prefabricated lexical bundles on the writing development of advanced EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(2), 214-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.2p.214

- Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2013). Introduction to research in education. Boston: Cengage Learning.

- Asaei, R., & Rezvani, E. (2015). The effect of explicit vs. implicit instruction on Iranian EFL learners' use of collocations in L2 writing. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(3), 1-22.

- Attar, E. M., & Allami, H. (2013). The effects of teaching lexical collocations on speaking ability of Iranian EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(6), 1070-1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.6.1070-1079

- Bakhshizadeh, Y., Rahimi Domakani, M., & Rajaei, M. (2015). The effect of explicit instruction of formulaic sequences on oral proficiency improvement of young Iranian EFL students. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 3(10), 44-52. 

- Biber, D. E. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001

- Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371-405. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371

- Billett, S. (1998). Appropriation and ontogeny: identifying compatibility between cognitive and sociocultural contributions to adult learning and development. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 17(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260137980170103

- Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: putting a Lexical Approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr195oa

- Brown, A., & Palincsar, A. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction. Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

- Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). London: Pearson Education.

- Carter, R., & Mccarthy, M. (2014). Vocabulary and language teaching. London: Routledge.

- Cazden, C. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

- Cazden, C. B. (1993). Does writing as a process = writing as social practice? Paper presented at the Annual Convention of American Education Research Association, Atlanta.

- Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Language teaching approaches: An overview. In M. C. Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

- Chambers, F. (1997). What do we mean by fluency? System, 25(4), 535-544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00046-8

- Chun-guang, T. (2014). An empirical research on the corpus-driven lexical chunks instruction. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(2), 1-36.

- Cole, M. (1995). Culture and cognitive development: From cross-cultural research to creating systems of cultural mediation. Culture & Psychology, 1(1), 25-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x9511003

- Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2008). Formulaic sequences: Are they processed more quickly than nonformulaic language by native and nonnative speakers? Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 72-89. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm022

- Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001

- Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 354-375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354

- Goh, C. C. M., & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking: A holistic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.

- Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching (5^th ed.). London: Pearson Education.

- Hsu, J.Y., & Chiu, C. Y. (2008). Lexical collocations and their relation to speaking proficiency of college EFL learners in Taiwan. Asian EFL Journal, 10(1), 181-204.

- Huang, J., & Normandia, B. (2007). Learning the language of mathematics: a study of student writing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 294-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00173.x

- Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001

- Jalali, H., Eslami Rasekh, A., & Tavangar Rizi, M. (2008). Lexical bundles and intradisciplinary variation: The case of applied linguistics. Iranian Journal of Language Studies, 2(4), 447-484.

- Khodadady, E., & Shamsaee, S. (2012). Formulaic sequences and their relationship with speaking and listening abilities. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 39-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n2p39

- Kuiper, K. (1996). Smooth talkers: The linguistic performance of auctioneers and sportscasters. New York: Erlbaum.

- Leedham, M. (2006). “Do I speak better?” A longitudinal study of lexical chunking in the spoken language of two Japanese students. The East Asian Learner, 2(2), 1-15

- Leontyev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress.

- Leontyev, A. N. (2009). The development of mind. Pacifica, CA: Marxists Internet Archive.

- Lewis, M. (1993). The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward. Hove: Language Teaching Publications.

- Lewis, M. (2008). Teaching collections, further developments in the lexical approach. New York: Heinle.

- Lin, L. L. (2010). Perspectives of Teachers and Students Toward Cooperative Learning Jigsaw Tasks in Taiwanese EFL Classrooms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Alliant International University, San Diego. Retrieved from http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.

- Mahdavi.Zafarghandi, A., Tahriri, A., & Dobahri Bandari, M. (2015). The impact of teaching chunks on speaking fluency of Iranian EFL learners. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(1), 46-59. 

- McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2002). This that and the other: Multi-word clusters in spoken English as visible patterns of interaction. TEANGA, 21, 30-52.

- McCauley, S. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2017). Computational investigations of multiword chunks in language learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 637-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tops.12258

- McCroskey, J. C. (1992). Reliability and validity of the willingness to communicate scale. Communication Quarterly, 40(1), 16-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369817

- McGuire, M., & Larson-Hall, J. (2017). Teaching formulaic sequences in the classroom: Effects on spoken fluency. TESL Canada Journal, 34(3), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v34i3.1271

- Mohammadi, M., & Enayati, B. (2018). The effects of lexical chunks teaching on EFL intermediate learners’ speaking fluency. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 179-192. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11313a

- Mohseni, A., Marzban, A., & Keshavarzi, A. (2014). The effect of chunk learning on listening comprehension. International journal of language and linguistics, 2, 310-316. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20140205.14

- Namaziandost, E., Abdy Saray, A., & Rahimi Esfahani, F. (2018). The effect of writing practice on improving speaking skill among pre-intermediate EFL learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(12), 1690-1697. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0812.16

- Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching: Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136

- Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Boston, MA: Heinle andHeinle Publishers.

- Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching: McGraw-Hill Education.

- O'Dell, F., & McCarthy, M. (2008). English collocations in use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Pawlak, M. (2011). Extending the boundaries of research on second language learning and teaching: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

- Pawly, A., & Syder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection and native-like fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication. Harlow, UK: Longman.

- Quick Oxford Placement Test (2001). Quick placement test. London: Oxford University Press and the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate

- Ranjbar, N., Pazhakh, A., & Gorjian, B. (2012). The Effect of Lexical Bundles on Iranian EFL Learners Linguistic Production Fluency. International Education Studies, 5(4), 243-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n4p243

- Richards, J. C. (2009). Teaching listening and speaking: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Richards, J.C., & Bohlke, D. (2012). Four corners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Sadat Kiaee, S. S., Moghaddam, N. H., & Hosseini, E. M. (2013). The effect of teaching collocations on enhancing Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of advances in English language teaching, 1(1), 1-11.

- Sadighi, S., Sahragard, R. (2013). The effect of lexical collocational density on the Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 32(1), 111-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2013.1495

- Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Schmitt, N., & McCarthy, M. (1997). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Shamsabadi, R., Ketabi, S., Eslami Rasekh, A. (2017). Developing Iranian EAP students’ writing skill through explicit instruction of lexical bundles. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 9(19), 25-52.

- Shen, L. (2015). Impacts of chunks input on Chinese English major students’ oral production. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(10), 2138-2143. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0510.22.

- Shooshtari, Z. G., & Karami, N. (2013). Lexical collocation instruction and its impact on Iranian non-academic EFL learners' speaking ability. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 767.

- Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

- Taguchi, N., & Iwasaki, Y. (2008). Training effects on the development of oral fluency in L2 Japanese. Japanese Language and Literature, 42(2), 413-437.

- Thornburry, S. (1999). How to teach grammar. Harlow: Longman.

- Thornbury, S. (2005). How to Teach Speaking. Harlow:  Pearson Education Limited

- Thornbury, S. (2011). Language teaching methodology, In J. Simpson (Ed.), Routledge handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 185-199). Oxon: Routledge.

- Thornbury, S., & Slade, D. (2006). Conversation: From description to pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Underwood, G., Schmitt, N., & Galpin, A. (2004). The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences. In N.Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

- Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind. A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

- Widdowson, H. (1991). The description and prescription of language. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1991 (pp. 11-24). Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press.

- Wood, D. (2006). Uses and functions of formulaic sequences in second language speech: An exploration of the foundations of fluency. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 13-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.13

- Wood, D. (2010). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background, evidence and classroom applications. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

- Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: principle and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 463-489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.463

- Wray, A. (2005). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

- Wray, A., & Fitzpatrick, T. (2008). Why can’t you just leave it alone? Deviations from memorized language as a gauge of nativelike competence. In F. Meunier & S. Granger (Eds.), Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 123-148). Amsterdm, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.

- Zaferanieh, E., & Behrooznia, S. (2011). On the impacts of four collocation instructional methods: Web-based concordancing vs. traditional method, explicit vs. implicit Instruction. Studies in Literature and Language, 3(3), 120.

- Zarei,A.A., & Tondaki, N.(2015). The effects of explicit and implicit instructional techniques on Iranian EFL learners’ comprehension and production of lexical collocations. Academie Royale Des Sciences D Outre-Mer Bulletin Des Seances, 4(2), 122-131.

- Zhang, Y. (2009). Reading to speak: Integrating oral communication skills. English Teaching Forum, 47(1), 32-34.