Reflexive Metadiscourse Markers in Academic Interviews: A Frequency and Functional Study
Subject Areas :Oranoos Rezaei 1 , Seyed Foad Ebrahimi 2 , Saeed Yazdani 3
1 - English department, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran
2 - English department, Shadegan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shadegan, Iran
3 - English department, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran
Keywords: عناصر فراگفتمانی, مصاحبه, پیکره گفتاری انگلیسی اکادمیکی میشیگان, عناصر فرا گفتمانی بازتابی,
Abstract :
Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Vol. 24. John Benjamins Publishing.
Ädel, A. (2010). Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 69-97.
Aguilar, M. (2008). Metadiscourse in academic speech: A relevance-theoretic approach. . Peter Lang.
Camiciottoli, B. C. (2003). Metadiscourse and ESP reading comprehension: An exploratory study.
Charles, M. (2013). English for academic purposes. In The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 137-153). Paltridge Brian and Sue Starfield (West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Cheng, X., & Steffensen, M. S. (1996). Metadiscourse: A technique for improving student writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 149-181.
Dastjerdi, H. V., & Shirzad, M. (2010). The impact of explicit instruction of meta-discourse engineering writers in English. . English Linguistics Research, 1(1), 88-96.
Ghaffari, J., Behjat, F., & Rostampoor, M. (2015). Interpersonal metadiscourse markers instruction and Iranian EFL learner's writing skills. Iranian EFL Journal, 11(1), 417-440.
Gold Sanford, S. (2012). A comparison of metadiscourse markers and writing quality in adolescent written narrative. University of Montana: Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional].
Harris, Z. (1959). Linguistic transformations for information retrieval //Papers in Structural and Transformational Linguistics. Dordrecht: D.Reidel,1970 (original work published 1959).
Hashemi, M., Azizinezhad, M., & S., D. (2012). Using task-based language teaching, learning practically in English classe. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 526-529.
Hockett, C. (1977). The View from Language: Selected Essays 1948- 1974. . Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Hyland, K. (2000). Hedges, boosters, and lexical invisibility: Noticing
modifiers in academic texts. L. Language Awareness, 9(4), 179-197.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Oxford: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. . Oxford: Continuum.
Jakobson, R. (1980). The framework of language. Michigan: Michigan Studies in the Humanities.
Jalilifar, A., & Alipour, M. (2007). How explicit instruction makes a difference: Metadiscourse markers and EFL learners' reading comprehension skill. . Journal of College Reading and Learning, 38(1), 35-52.
Lucy, J. (1993). Reflexive Language and the Human Disciplines. . In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metalinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luukka, M. R. (1992). Metadiscourse in academic texts. (Paper presented at Conference on Discourse and the Professions, Uppsala, Sweden, 1992).
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matroudy, M., & Ebrahimi, S. F. (2022). Functional Analysis of Reflexive Metadiscourse in Dissertation Defense Sessions [Research]. International Journal of Research in English Education, 7(1), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.52547/ijree.7.1.72
Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. . English for specific Purposes, 12(2), 3-22.
Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. . English for specific Purposes, 12(1), 3-22.
Parvaresh, V., & Nemati, M. (2008). Metadiscourse and reading comprehension: The effect of language & proficiency. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(2), 220-239.
Pérez, M. A., & Macià, E. A. (2002). Metadiscourse in Lecture Comprehension: Does it Really Help Foreign Language Learners? Atlantis, 3-21.
Pooresfahani, A. F., Khajavy, G. H., & Vahidnia, F. (2012). A contrastive study of metadiscourse elements in research articles written by Iranian applied linguistics and engineering writers in English. English Linguistics Research, 1(1), 88-96.
Schiffrin, D. (1980). Meta‐talk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3-4), 199-236.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. . Cambridge University Press.
Tafaroji Yeganeh, M., & Ghoreyshi, S. M. (2015). Exploring gender differences in the use of discourse markers in Iranian academic research articles. . Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 684-689.
Taghizadeh, M., & Tajabadi , F. (2003). Metadiscourse in essay writing: An EFL case Department of foreign languages, university of Tehran, Tehran , Iran.].
Thompson, S. E. (2003). Text-structuring metadiscourse, intonation, and the signaling of organization in academic lectures. Journal of English for academic purposes, 2(1), 5-20.
Van Dijk, T. A., Ting-Toomey, S., Smitherman, G., & Troutman, D. (1997). Discourse, ethnicity, culture and racism. In Discourse as interaction in society. Van Dijk, Teun A. (London: Sage, 1997).
Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College composition and communication, 36, 82-93.
Zare, J., & Tavakoli, M. (2016). The use of personal metadiscourse over monologic and dialogic modes of academic speech. Discourse Processes, 54(2), 163-175.
Zhu, Y. (2018). An Intercultural Analysis of personal metadiscourse in English , Chinese Commencement Speeches. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(5), 100-110.