Evaluating the Effects of Government Policies on the Economic Development of Rural Areas (Case Study: Villages of Astara County)

Subject Areas :

Fereshteh Ebadolahian ¹ , Seyyede Sedighe Hasanimehr ² , Rafat Shahmari Ardjani ³ , Hossein Asghari ⁴

1 - Phd. Student, Department of Geography and Rural Planning, Astara Branch, Islamic Azad University, Astara, Iran
2 - Associate Professor, Department of Geography, Astara Branch, Islamic Azad University, Astara, Iran
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Astara Branch, Islamic Azad University, Asrata, Iran
4 - Assistant Professor, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Astara Branch, Islamic Azad University, Astara, Iran

Received: 2022-12-28 Accepted : 2023-05-31 Published : 2024-05-04

Keywords: Rural development, Development programs, Government policy making, Astara County.,

Abstract :

The requirement to achieve national development is to improve the level of capabilities of rural communities in the economic sector. In this regard, it is considered necessary to evaluate the existing policies for the economic development of rural communities. For this purpose, the current research was written with the aim of evaluating the impact of government policies on the economic development of the villages of Astara County, with an emphasis on the fourth and fifth development plans. The research method in the present research is mixed (quantitative-qualitative) with practical purpose and analytical-exploratory nature. The statistical population of the research also includes managers, officials and experts on rural issues in Gilan province and Astara county, and using Cohen's formula at the 95% confidence level, 70 people have been determined as the sample size. Also, in line with data analysis were used one-sample t-tests and linear and logarithmic regression in SPSS software. The findings of the research show that the level of employment during the fourth and fifth development plans in the villages of Astara County had an upward trend, although with a slow slope. Also, commercial-industrial centers under the support of the Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization have experienced a growth of 26.56 percent during the fourth plan and a significant growth of 155.7 percent during the fifth development plan. Rural food industries also increased by 87.5 percent during the fourth period of development, which shows a growing trend during the fifth development plan as well, but with a lower slope. On the other hand, the examination of 5 major policies during each of the 4th and 5th plans shows that the influence of the 5th plan on the economic development of the villages of Astara was much greater.

References:

ازکیا، مصطفی (1390). جامعه‌شناسی توسعه و توسعه‌نیافتگی روستایی ایران. تهران: انتشارات اطلاعات.
اسدی، زینب؛ پوررمضان، عیسی؛ مولایی هشجین، نصرالله (1395). نقش مشارکت در توسعه‌ی روستایی بخش خشکبیجار شهرستان رشت. اقتصاد فضا و توسعه‌ی روستایی. 5 (1)، 61-82.
بدری، سیدعلی؛ رضوانی، محمدرضا؛ خدادادی، پروین (1398). تحلیل محتوای کیفی سیاست‌های فضایی توسعه‌ی روستایی کشور پس از انقلاب اسلامی. برنامه‌ریزی فضایی. 9 (32)، 1-24.
دانایی‌فرد، حسن (1388). روش‌شناسی تدوین خط‌مشی ملی کارآفرینی کشور. نشریه‌ی توسعه‌ی کارآفرینی. 2 (6)، 125-155.
زاهدی، محمدجواد؛ غفاری، غلامرضا؛ ابراهیمی لویه، عادل (1391). کاستی‌های نظری برنامه‌ریزی توسعه‌ی روستایی در ایران. پژوهش‌های روستایی. 4 (12)، 1-24.
سیدنقوی، میرعلی؛ بابایی، علی (1392). ارزیابی سیاست‌های توسعه‌ی اقتصاد روستایی از دیدگاه منطقه‌ای با نگاهی بر سیاست‌های دولت در ایران. پژوهش‌های روستایی. 4 (3)، 451-479.
شمس‌الدینی، علی؛ جمینی، داود (1395). ارزیابی عملکرد نهادهای متولی در توسعه‌ی سکونتگاه‌های روستایی با رویکرد معادلات ساختاری مورد مطالعه: شهرستان جوانرود. جغرافیا و توسعه. 14 (43)، 35-50.
طالشی، مصطفی؛ شاطریان، محسن؛ گنجی‌پور، محمود (1400). نقش دولت در توانمندسازی جوامع روستایی، مورد مطالعه ناحیه‌ی کاشان در ایران مرکزی. کاوش‌های جغرافیایی مناطق بیابانی. (9) 2، 203-223.
Abreu, I., Mesias, F.J. & Ramjo, J. (2022). Design and validation of an index to measure development in rural areas through stakeholder participation. Journal of Rural Studies. 95, 232-240.
Aguilar, A.G. (2008). Peri-urbanization, illegal settlements and environmental impact in Mexico City. Cities. 25 (3), 133–145.
Chen, A. & Scott, S. (2014). Rural development strategies and government roles in the development of farmers’ cooperatives in China. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development. 4 (4), 35–55.
Cheshire, P. (2017). Identifying Principles for Spatial Policy: Levels of Intervention, Last Assessed (8/1/2017). www.apdr.pt/siteRPER/numeros/RPER13/13.4.pdf.
Cirella, G.T. & Tao, L. (2010). The index of sustainable functionality: an application for measuring sustainability. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences. 5, 279-285.
Deng, H. et al (2010). Policy support and emerging farmer professional cooperatives in rural China. China Economic Review. 21 (4), 495–507.
Ferreira, F.A.F. et al (2022). Urban blight remediation strategies subject to seasonal constraints. European Journal of Operational Research. 296 (1), 277-288.
Freshwater, D. (2007, June). Rural Development and the Declining Coherence of Rural Policy: An American and Canadian Perspective. Paper prepared for the conference, Public Policy and Rural Development – An EU/US Comparison, Wye, UK.
Freshwater, D. & Trapasso, R. (2014). The disconnect Between Principles and Practice: Rural Policy Reviews of OECD Countries. Growth and Change. 45 (4), 477–498.
Garnevska, E.; Liu, G. & Shadbolt, N. M. (2011). Factors for successful development of farmer cooperatives in northwest China. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. 14 (4), 69–84.
Howlett, T. (2011). Designing Public Policy: Principles and instruments. Routledge. First Edition. [N.P]: London and New York.
Hu, S. et al (2022). A framework for assessing sustainable agriculture and rural development: A case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 97, 1-14.
Komeily, A. & Srinivasan, R.S. (2015). A need for balanced approach to neighborhood sustainability assessments: a critical review and analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society. 18, 32–43.
Mohammed, H. & Muhammad, Y. (2019). The role of local government in rural development in Nigeria: A study of Lafia local government area of Nasarawa state. African Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research. 2 (3), 1-11.
OECD. (2006). The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance. OECD Rural Policy. Reviews. First Edition. Paris: OECD publishing.
Patrick, R. (2002). Developing Sustainability Indicators for Rural Residential Areas: The Public Transit Connection. Simon Fraser University: United State.
Qingjuana, Y.; Beia, L. & Kuia, L. (2011). The rural landscape research in Chengdu’s urban-rural intergration development. Procedia Engineering, 21, 780-788.
Thorn, J.; Thornton, T.F. & Helfgott, A. (2015). Autonomous adaptation to global environmental change in peri-urban settlements: Evidence of a growing culture of innovation and revitalisation in Mathare Valley Slums, Nairobi. Global Environmental Change. 31 (1), 121–131.
Torre, A.; Wallet, F. & Huang, J. (2023). A collaborative and multidisciplinary approach to knowledge-based rural development: 25 years of the PSDR program in France. Journal of Rural Studies. 97, 428-437.
Vargas, S. (2010). Rural development and bioenergy: An alternative approach. In Y. Khwaja (Ed.). The BEFS Analysis for Peru. Supporting the Policy Machinery in Peru. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO).
Woka Ihuah, P.; Ibimina Kakulu, I. & Eaton, D. (2014). A review of Critical Project Management Success Factors (CPMSF) for sustainable social housing in Nigeria. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment. 3 (1), 62-71.
Yuliastuti, N. & Saraswati, N. (2014). Environmental quality in urban settlement: the role of local community association in east Semarang sub-district. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 135, 31–35.