Prioritizing Management Styles for Performance Improvement of Official Organization Workers (Case study: official organizations of Tabriz)
Subject Areas : Business Management
1 - Department of Management, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
Keywords: motivation, Cooperation, satisfaction, management styles, Workers', organizational performance,
Abstract :
Today, managers are confronted with people who have complicated duties, and management approaches toward the importance of human resources in activity environments have changed. Managers are able to select different management styles for directing human resources. Approaches to organizational management are very important because these approaches influence organizational behavior, especially approaches that are related to performance and job commitment. In this regard, one of the important functions of managers in organizations is to determine the potential of workers and to deploy their growth fields in order to promote productivity. In fact, the success of the organization in achieving its goals, which depends on the effective leadership styles of the manager, has been the subject of the present research. Hence, with regard to the importance of the fact that one of the factors affecting the increase in productivity is the leadership style of the organization managers, the present research aims to determine the management styles for promoting staff performance with a focus on satisfaction, cooperation and motivation of the staff. The statistical population consists of the managers, specialists, and ordinary employees of the official organizations of Tabriz. With regard to some limitations, only five organizations were selected for data collection, and their management styles were studied. Finally, according to the obtained results, management styles were determined and prioritized separately for each organization based on their activity type in order to promote the performance of managers, specialists, and ordinary employees with a focus on satisfaction, cooperation, and motivation.
- زاهدی، شمس‌السادات (1391)، روابط صنعتی.تهران.مرکزنشردانشگاهی
- شرمرهورن، هانت آزبورن (1391)، مدیریت رفتار سازمانی. ترجمه ایران‌نژاد پاریزی و بابایی، کلیکی و سبحان‌اللهی. تهران. مؤسسه تحقیقات و آموزش مدیریت وابسته به وزارت نیرو.
- فقهی فرهمند، دکترناصر (1390)، مدیریت پویای سازمان، چاپ دوم، انتشارات فروزش، تبریز.
- (1388)، تدوین برنامه استراتژیک سازمان، چاپ اول، انتشارات فروزش، تبریز.
- (1390)، مدیریت استراتژیک سازمان، چاپ دوم، انتشارات فروزش، تبریز.
- (1390)، مدیریت تکنولوژی سازمان، چاپ دوم، انتشارات فروزش، تبریز.
- فلاح نفری، سکینه (1376)، بررسی رابطه بین رضایت و کارآیی. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشکده حسابداری و مدیریت دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی.
- کامدیده، علیرضا (1381)، بررسی رابطه کیفیت زندگی کاری کارکنان شرکت آبفای منطقه پنج تهران. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد. کرج. مؤسسه تحقیقات و آموزش مدیریت وابسته به وزارت نیرو.
- محمدزاده، دکتر عباس و مهروژان، آرمن (1375)، رفتار سازمانی، تهران، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، چاپ اول.
- Bruderl, J., Preisendorfer, P., Ziegler R. (2012), Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. American Sociological Review. 57, 227-242
- Dessein, W. (2013), Hierarchies versus Committees, Working Paper, University of Chicago. Pp 52-64.
- Frenkel, S. (2012), Industrilization and Labour Relations, Contemporary Research in Seven Countries, ILR Press, Ithaca.
- Glenn H. (2012), The application of QFD to Design a course in TQM, QFD Institute, USA, pp 65-104
- Harris, M. (2011), A Theory of Board Control and Size, Review of Financial Studies, pp 15-98.
- Hartmann, H., Kris, E., Loewenstein, R. (2012), The function of theory in psychoanalysis. Psychological Issues, 4, 117-143
- Hauser, J. (2011), An Evaluation Cost Model, Journal of Consumer Research, pp 66-105
- Khoo, N. (1996),Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment,International Journal of Production Research, pp23-49
- Madrian, B. and D. Shea (2011), The Power of Suggestion, Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp 18-116
- Noam G.G., Hauser S.T., Santostefano S., Garrison W., Jacobson A.M., Powers S.I., Mead M. (2010). Ego development and psychopathology: A study of hospitalised adolescents. Child Development, 55(1), 185-194
- Payne, A. and Frow, P. (2012), 'A strategic framework for customer relationship management', Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69 (October), pp. 36–81
- Probert, D.R., Jones, S.W. and Gregory, M.J. (2012), ‘The make or buy decision in the context of manufacturing strategy development’, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 207, pp. 241-250
- Smith, N. R. (2013), The Entrepreneur and His Organization. University of Michigan: Bureau of Taking workers to the work and Economic Research
- Sriyan de. Silva (2012), Hurnan Resources Development for Competiveness, A Priority For Employers
- Storey, D. J. (2010), Understanding the small Taking workers to the work Sector, London: Rutledge.
- Stutely, R. (2012), The Definitive Taking workers to the work Plan, London: Financial Times Prentice Hall
- Taylor, S., Beechler, S. and Napier, N. (2012), ‘Toward an Integrative Model of Strategic International Human Resource Management’, Academy of Management Review, 21(6): 959–85
- Watts, H. D., Wood, A. M. and Wardle. P. (2013), Making Friends Or Making Things?, Urban Studies
_||_