Effects of food restriction on serum concentration of glucose, triacylglycerol, beta-hydroxy butyrate, non-esterified fatty acids and urea in pregnant ewes

Subject Areas : Veterinary Clinical Pathology

علی Rezapour ¹ , مهدی Taghinezhad ² , GH.R Assadnasab ³

1 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
2 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
3 - Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

Received: 2011-01-14 Accepted : 2011-06-08 Published : 2011-05-22

Keywords: glucose, Urea, Beta-hydroxy butyrate, Food restriction, Ghezel ewe, non-esterified fatty acids, Triacylglycerol,

Abstract :

Food restriction is a potential unwanted risk for a developing fetus in pregnant ewe. The objective of this study was to study the effects of food restriction on serum concentration of glucose, triacylglycerol, non-esterified fatty acids, beta-hydroxybutyrate and urea in the last 8 weeks of pregnancy in Ghezel sheep (Azerbaijan native). We used Split-plot in time design and the overall sample was 14 Ghezel ewes. After a primary preparation period and using flashing diet, oesterus cycle was synchronized in an out of breeding season with sheep CIDR. Pregnancy induction was carried out through natural mating. Primary sampling (P0) was done 4 weeks after mating and then the ewes were divided and assigned to two groups: Control (T2) and food restriction group (T1). In different stages of pregnancy (P1 – P3) sampling was performed and the above mentioned parameters were measured. We used 16.5-27.5% food restriction. Our results surprisingly showed that food restriction had no statistically significant effect on serum glucose and triacylglycerol concentration, but it had a statistically significant effect on serum beta-hydroxy butyrate, non-esterified fatty acids and urea concentration (p<0.05). Food restriction resulted in mild to moderate ketosis in some individual animals. We conclude that food-restricted pregnant ewes following initial flashing diet at the beginning of pregnancy could maintain their glucose homeostasis and end her pregnancy period by using fat reserves and gluconeogenesis. Only one ewe aborted during food restriction in the end stage of pregnancy and others tolerated the situation.  

References:

1. زارع شحنه، ا. و صادقی پناه، ح. 1383. تأثیر سرعت رشد جنین بر غلظت متابولی تهای پلاسمای میش رگامه­های پایانی آبستنی و پس از زایش. علوم و فنون کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی. اصفهان، سال هشتم،  شماره چهارم، صفحه­های 123-130.


2. طباطبایی، م.­م. 1382. جنبه­های فیزیولوژی تغذیه نشخوارکنندگان. (ترجمه)، تألیف: سو آن، چاپ اول، همدان، انتشارات دانشگاه ابوعلی سینا، صفحه 463.


3. Anonymous 1985. NRC: Nutrient requirements of sheep. National Academy Press, WashingtonD.C., 6th edition, 8p.


4. Anonymous 1995. AOAC: official methods of analysis. Association of official analytical chemists, Arlington, Virginia, 16th edition, 10p.


5. Bell, A., McBride, W., Slepetis, B.W., Early, R.J. and Currie, W.B. 1989. Chronic heat stress and prenatal development in sheep: 1. Conceptus growth and maternal plasma hormones and metabolites. J. Anim. Sci. 67:3289-3299.


6. Bergman, E.N. 1963. Quantitative aspects of glucose in pregnant and non-pregnant sheep. Am. J. Physiol. 204:147-152.


7. Bergman, E.N., Roe, W.E. and Kon, K. 1966. Quantitative aspects of propionate metabolism and gluconeogenesis in sheep. Am. J. Physiol. 211:793-799.


8. Kaneko, J.J., Harvey, J.W. and Bruss, M.L. 2008. Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals. Academic Press, USA. 6th edition, chapters 3-4 & appendices no. VIII.


9. Kerr, M.G. 2002. Veterinary laboratory medicine (clinical biochemistry and hematology). Blackwell science, London, 2nd edition, chapter 8.


10. McNeill, D.M., Slepetis, R., Ehrhardt, R.A., Smith, D.M. and Bell, A.W. 1997. Protein requirements of sheep in late pregnancy: partitioning of nitrogen between gravid uterus and maternal tissues. J. Anim. Sci. 75:809-816.


11. Ramin, A.G., Asri, S. and Majdani, R. 2005. Correlations among serum glucose, beta-hydroxybutyrate and urea concentrations in non-pregnant ewes, Small Ruminant Research, 57: 265–269.


12. Reece, W.O. 2004. Dukes’ physiology of domestic animals. Comstock publishing associates a division of Cornell university press, U.S.A., 12th edition, chapter 33.


13. Robinson, J.J., Rooke, J.A. and McEvoy, T.G. 2002. Nutrition for Conception and Pregnancy. P: 198-211, In: Freer, M. and H. Dove (eds.), Sheep nutrition. 1st edition, CAB international, London, chapter 9.


14. Schlumbohm, C. and Harmeyer, J. 2004. Hyperketonemia impairs glucose metabolism in pregnant and non-pregnant ewes. J. Dairy Sci. 87:350-358.


15. Smith, B.P. 1996. Large animal internal medicine. Mosby press, U.S.A., 2nd edition.  p 939.


16. Suriayasathaporn, W., Heuer, C., Noordhuizen-Stassen, E.N. and Schukken, Y.H. 2000. Hyperketonemia and the impairment of udder defense: a review. veterinary research. 31:397-412.


17. Wilson, S., MacRae, J.C. and Buttery, P.J. 1983. Glucose production and utilization in non-pregnant, pregnant and lactating ewes. Br. J. Nutr. 50:303- 316.