The Effect of Using Input Enhancement on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners of L2 Adjective Knowledge
Subject Areas : Journal of Teaching English Language Studies
Mahboobeh Joze Tajareh
1
(
Department of English language, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon,
IRAN.
)
Mohammadreza Khodareza
2
(
Department of English language, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon,
IRAN.
)
Keywords:
Abstract :
Abbasi, F. & Farokhi, F. (2010). The study of Effectiveness of Visual Input Enhancement in
Reading Texts. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Tabriz University
Bakori, H. (2009). Input Enhancement and Task-based Language Learning and Teaching.
Retrieved January 15, 2013 from
http://www.fllt2013.org/private_folder/Proceeding/391.pdf.
Dekeyser, R. (ed.).2007. practice in second language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doughty, C. (1991). Second Language Instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an
Empirical Study of SL Relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(1),
431-469.
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
JOURNAL OF TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, Vol. 4, NO. 3, Winter 2016
28
Ellis, R. (2012) Language teaching research and pedagogy. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Han, Z., Park, E., & Combs, C. (2008). Textual Enhancement of Input: Issues and Possibilities.
Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 597-618.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford:
Pergamon Press
Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis:Issues and Implication. London: Longman.
Krashen, S. and Terrell, T. (1983). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the
Classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.
Lee, J. F., & VanPatten, B. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen, 2nd
edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Leow, R. (1997). Input Enhancement and Text Length on Adults L2 Readers’ Comprehension
and Intake in Second Language Acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8(6), 151-82.
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K.
De Bot, R. B. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross -
cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Philadelphia: Benjamins .
Sahebkheir, F. & Davatgari Asl, H. (2014). The Role of Input Enhancement on Using
Conjunctions in Iranian EFL Learners' Written Performance. Retrieved March 3, 2014,
from http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20140202.19.pdf
Schmidt, R. (1990). The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning. Applied
Linguistics, 11(2), 129-1580
Schmidt, R. (1994). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial And SLA. In
Ellis, N. (Ed.) (1994).Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic Press.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied
Linguistics, 2(2), 90-106.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). "Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of
language information for the L2 learner". Second Language Research, vol.7 (2), 118-132
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input Enhancement in Instructed SLA: Theoretical bases Studies in
Second Language Acquisition, vol. 15(2), 165–179.
Shook, D. (1994). FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input to intake
phenomenon.Applied Language Learning, vol.5 (2), 57-93.
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P. M. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2
classroom. SSLA, 15(4), 205-224.
Stern, H. H. (1990). Analysis and experience as variables in second language pedagogy.
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood,
NJ: Ablex.
White, J. (1998).Getting the Learners’ Attention: A Typographical Input Enhancement Study. In
C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.) (1998).Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language
Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, L. (2000). Second language acquisition and linguistic theory. London: Blackwell.
