The Effect of Using Input Enhancement on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners of L2 Adjective Knowledge
محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Teaching English Language StudiesMahboobeh Joze Tajareh 1 , Mohammadreza Khodareza 2
1 - Department of English language, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon,
IRAN.
2 - Department of English language, Tonekabon Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tonekabon,
IRAN.
کلید واژه: input enhancement, EFL learners, Consciousness Raising, L2 adjectives knowledge,
چکیده مقاله :
The role of input is vital in the process of foreign language learning. This article intended toinvestigate the effect of using input enhancement on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’knowledge of L2 adjectives. The question of this study lied in the fact that whether using inputenhancement in classroom has any effects on intermediate EFL learners’ knowledge of L2adjectives. This article considered some issues underlying input enhancement between twolanguages and their effect on L2 adjective knowledge. The participants were 60 intermediateEFL learners were homogenized by Oxford Placement Test and were divided in two groups, oneof them was control group and the other was the experimental group. The next step, the pretest ofadjectives knowledge was administered for both groups. Then treatment was administered in theway that input enhancement was used in one group and there wasn’t any input enhancement incontrol group. After that the posttest was administered in both groups and at the end the data wasanalyzed by two way independent sample t-test and one-way ANCOVA. The result of studyshowed that the null hypothesis of the study was rejected.
Abbasi, F. & Farokhi, F. (2010). The study of Effectiveness of Visual Input Enhancement in
Reading Texts. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Tabriz University
Bakori, H. (2009). Input Enhancement and Task-based Language Learning and Teaching.
Retrieved January 15, 2013 from
http://www.fllt2013.org/private_folder/Proceeding/391.pdf.
Dekeyser, R. (ed.).2007. practice in second language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Doughty, C. (1991). Second Language Instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an
Empirical Study of SL Relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(1),
431-469.
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
JOURNAL OF TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES, Vol. 4, NO. 3, Winter 2016
28
Ellis, R. (2012) Language teaching research and pedagogy. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Han, Z., Park, E., & Combs, C. (2008). Textual Enhancement of Input: Issues and Possibilities.
Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 597-618.
Krashen, S. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford:
Pergamon Press
Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis:Issues and Implication. London: Longman.
Krashen, S. and Terrell, T. (1983). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the
Classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.
Lee, J. F., & VanPatten, B. (2003). Making communicative language teaching happen, 2nd
edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Leow, R. (1997). Input Enhancement and Text Length on Adults L2 Readers’ Comprehension
and Intake in Second Language Acquisition. Applied Language Learning, 8(6), 151-82.
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K.
De Bot, R. B. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross -
cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Philadelphia: Benjamins .
Sahebkheir, F. & Davatgari Asl, H. (2014). The Role of Input Enhancement on Using
Conjunctions in Iranian EFL Learners' Written Performance. Retrieved March 3, 2014,
from http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20140202.19.pdf
Schmidt, R. (1990). The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning. Applied
Linguistics, 11(2), 129-1580
Schmidt, R. (1994). Implicit learning and the cognitive unconscious: Of artificial And SLA. In
Ellis, N. (Ed.) (1994).Implicit and explicit learning of languages. London: Academic Press.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied
Linguistics, 2(2), 90-106.
Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). "Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of
language information for the L2 learner". Second Language Research, vol.7 (2), 118-132
Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input Enhancement in Instructed SLA: Theoretical bases Studies in
Second Language Acquisition, vol. 15(2), 165–179.
Shook, D. (1994). FL/L2 reading, grammatical information, and the input to intake
phenomenon.Applied Language Learning, vol.5 (2), 57-93.
Spada, N. & Lightbown, P. M. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2
classroom. SSLA, 15(4), 205-224.
Stern, H. H. (1990). Analysis and experience as variables in second language pedagogy.
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction: Theory and research. Norwood,
NJ: Ablex.
White, J. (1998).Getting the Learners’ Attention: A Typographical Input Enhancement Study. In
C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.) (1998).Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language
Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, L. (2000). Second language acquisition and linguistic theory. London: Blackwell.
