Evaluating Visual Preferences of Architects and People Toward Housing Facades, Using Multidimensional Scaling Analysis (MDS)

Subject Areas : Space Ontology International Journal

Hafezeh Pourdehghan ¹ , Azadeh Shahcheraghi ² , Seyed Mostafa Mokhtabad ³ , Hamid Majedi ⁴

1 - Ph.D, Department of Art and Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 - Associate professor, Department of Art and Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 - Professor, Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
4 - professor, Department of Art and Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Received: 2018-02-21 Accepted : 2018-02-21 Published : 2017-12-01

Keywords:

References:

1. Ackerman J. (1969) , Listening to Architecture , Harvard Educational Review.


2. Alexander, Christopher, (1964), Notes on the Synthesis of Form, Harvard University press, Cambridge and Massachusetts.               


3. Appleyard D. (1979) The Conservation of Cities, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press


4. Bomanian, Mohammadreza; Shahbazi, Mehrdad; Oryani Nejad, Reza (2016) Comparative study of the complexity perception in the facade of prevalent new fashioned building facades in the city of Ardakan, HaftHesar environmental studies quarterly, Vol. 5., Issue 18. 


5. Broom, J. (2005) Mass Housing cannot be Sustained, in Blundel P, Petrescu D, Till J, Architecture and participation, Spon press, London                        


6. Devlin, k & Nasar, J.L. (1989) The Beauty and the Beast: Some Preliminary Comparisons of “High” Versus “popular” Residential Architecture and Public Versus Architecture Judgment of same. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9.       


7. Farmani, Saeid (2011). Multidimensional scaling and their applications in psychology, Online psychology magazine, Issue 3.


8. Ghaem, Gisoo (1996). Common language of constructing housing units during the past days in Iran, Saffeh, Issue 21, 22.


9. Geh, Ean (2014). People cities, Trans: Ghaffari, Ali, Ghaffari, Lila, Elm-e Memar publications, Tehran.


10. Golchin, Peyman; Naroui, Behrouz; Masnavi, Mohammadreza (2011). Evaluating the visual quality of the education spaces based on the priorities of the users, Environmentology quarterly, Vol. 38., Issue 62.                           


11. Golkar K. (2008) Conceptual Evolution of urban Visual Environment, From Cosmetic Approach Through To Sustainable Approach. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 5.


12. Hall, Stuart (2011)., Meaning, culture and social life, Trans: Golmohammadi, Ahmad; Ney publications, Tehran.        


13. Hejazi, El.; Naghsh, Zahra (2013). Multidimensional scaling and its advantages in different fields of psychology, Educative measurement quarterly, vol 4, Issue 13.


14. Jack. L., Nasar (2014). Evaluative image of the city, Trans: Asadi Mahalchali, Masoud; Armanshahr, Tehran.             


15. Jaworska N. (2009) A Review of Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) and its Utility in Various Psychological Domains. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 5.


16. Kaplan S. (1989) The visual environment: Public Participation in design and planning. Journal of Social Issues, 45                              


17. Meyer J., M. (2005) Using Multidimensional Scaling on Data from Pairs of Relative to Explore the Dimensionality of categorical Multifactorial Traits. Genetic Epidemiology, 9   


18. Lang, Jon (2014). Creating architectural theories: role of behavioural sciences in environmental design, Trans: Eynifar, Alireza; Tehran university.


19. Lawson, Bryan (2005). How designers think: the design process demystified; Trans: Nadimi, Hamid; Shahid Beheshti University.


20. Lawson, Bryan (2012), Language of space, Trans: Eynifar, Alireza; Karimian, Foad., Tehran university, Tehran.


21. Latifi, Amin; Sajjadzadeh, Hassan (2014). Evaluating the impact of environmental qualities on the behavioural patterns in the city parks; urban studies quarterly, Issue 11.


22. Porteous J. (1996) Environmental Aesthetics, ideas, policy and planning, London: Fontledge Rapoport A. (1982) The Meaning of the Built Environment. California: SAGE publication Torgerson W.S. (1958) Theory and Methods of scaling. New York: Jone Wiley and Sons Appleyard D. (1979) The Conservation of Cities, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.                                                                             


23. Rapoport A. (1982) The Meaning of the Built Environment. California: SAGE publication


24. Shahinzad, M.; Radian, Mojtaba and Pourjafar Mohammadreza (2015). Evaluating the visual preferences of the women from the urban spaces of Tehran, advances in cognitive sciences quarterly, Vol. 17, issue 1.


25. Tavassoli, G. (2014). Urban sociology; Tehran, Jame Shenasan.


26. Tayyebian, M. and Mansouri, Y. (2013). Elevating the environmental quality and satisfaction of life in the new neighbourhoods with prioritization of proceedings based on the viewpoint of resident citizens, Environtology quarterly, vol 39, Issue 4.         


27. Torgerson W.S. (1958) Theory and Methods of scaling. New York: Jone Wiley and Sons


28. Zumthor, P.(2006). Thinking of architecture; trans: Shelviri, Alireza, Herfeh Honarmand publications, 1st ed.,, 2015.