Physical policies of smart city with emphasis on smart growth approach (case study: Ardabil city)
Subject Areas : Geography
nasrin mosaddeg
1
,
Hossein Nazmfar
2
,
parviz norouzi sani
3
1 - Department of Geography and urban planning, Marand Branch, Islamic Azad university, Marand, Iran
2 - Professor of Department of Geography and urban planning, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
3 - Professor of Department of Geography and urban planning, Marand branch, Islamic azad university, Marand,Iran
Keywords: smart growth, smart city, Physical policies , Ardabil,
Abstract :
The urban system of Iran, in addition to the problems and problems related to the rapid growth of the population and the increase in urbanization, with challenges such as the unbalanced and unbalanced spatial structure, the incompatibility of the cities with the natural environment and most importantly with the reduction or depletion of natural resources, crises and numerous pollutions. environment is struggling, at the same time and from another point of view, according to the developments in the field of information and communication technology, the city is passing from a purely physical settlement with visible and traditional functions to a physical settlement with invisible functions. And the new is next to its traditional functions. With these interpretations, the goal of this research is the realization of a smart city based on the physical indicators of smart growth. The research method is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive and analytical. The required sample size was calculated based on Cochran's formula and Morgan's table, and according to the total number of the statistical population of the study, which is 160 people, the sample size of the study was 113 people. The data was collected using a researcher-made questionnaire. The findings show that among the regions of Ardabil city, regions 1 and 4 had the potential of a smart city with 0.33 and 0.26, respectively, and region 3 with a score of 0.20 had half the potential and region 2 as well. With a score of 0.19, they lacked the potential of a smart city. The results show that there is a significant difference between the urban areas of Ardabil in terms of compatibility with smart urban growth indicators, and the extent to which different areas have research indicators is not the same.
Abdali, E, Khalilabad, H. K & Peyvastehgar, Y. (2019). Spatial Physical Analysis - Urban Areas Based on Smarrt Growth In dicatorsCase Study: Areas of Yasuj city. Urban Planning Knowledge, 3(2), 83-97.
Ansari, M, Shareeatpanahi, M. V., Malekhoseini, A., & Modiri, M. (2019). Spatial analysis of the distribution of urban smart growth indicators in the Malayer city Neighborhoods. Journal ofof Regional Planning, 8(32), 93-112.
Asayesh, F & Mahinizadeh, M. (2023). Explanation of endogenous growth model based on smart cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 6(1), 95-114.
Azani, M & Parvaresh, R. (2018) .The comparison pattern of landuse, Sprawl and smart growth in Sustainable Development (Isfahan municipality: Isfahan's eleven zone). Journal of Geography and Environmental Studies, 7(25), 57-72.
Azim, A. Z. (2022). Assessing the Factors Affecting the Formation of a Smart City in The Geographical Space of Tabriz City. Journal of Space Political Planning, 4(3), 235-253.
Darvishi, Y, GholamiNoorAbadi, H., & Akradi, S. M. (2020). Smart urban growth spatial analysis using VIKOR (Case Study of Ardabil). Journal of Geographical Engineering of Territory, 4(7), 174-191.
Divsalar, A, Aliakbari, E & bakhshi, A. (2018). The role of smart growth in sustainable development of coastal cities (case study: Babolsar). Geographical Planning of Space Quarterly Journal, 8(29), 181-200.
Eftekhari, A, Pourtaheri, M & Adinehvand, E. (2020). Evaluation of Smart Growth Pattern Level in peri-urban rural areas of Tehran Metropolis. Journal of Spatial Planning, 24(1), 81-108.
Hadari, S, Hakak, M, Sepahvande, R & Nazarpoori, A. H. (2022). A comparative study of smart city with organizational architecture of information-communication technology of the municipality. Iranian Social Development Studies, 14(1), 189-204.
Hataminejad, H & Mansourietminan, A. (2021). The city of Hooshmand; the viability of the city; District 9 of Mashhad Municipality. Journal of Future Cities vision, 2(2), 1-13.
Isfahani, S.M & Hoseini, A.M. (2021). Analysis and evaluation of the impact of smart growth indicators on urban development in Arak. Quarterly Journal of Human Geography, 13(3), 174-198.
Kazemkhah, S, Ghadami, M, Amoli, J.A & Ghobadi, G. J. (2023). Evaluation and Analysis of Urban Spatial Development within the Framework of Smart Growth Model with Emphasis on Density, Landuse and Transportation Indicators (Case study: Rasht). Journal ofof Regional Planning, 12(47), 131-148. Retrieved from https://www.magiran.com/paper/2542423
Khandani, S, Safarloyi, M & Beygbabaye, B. (2022). Analysis of Urban Land Use According to Smart Urban Growth Strategy Indicators (A Case Study of Marand). Amayesh Journal, 14(55), 147-168. Retrieved from https://www.magiran.com/paper/2409988
Khodabakhsh, M, Sani, P.N, & Dalir, K.H. (2020). An analysis of spatial distribution of Tabriz city areas of urban Smart growth Indicators. Journal of Geography and Planning, 24(73), 157-180.
Mafi, E, & Sarabi, S. G. (2016). The Categorization of Urban Districts in Mashhad according to the Integrated Indicators of Smart Urban Growth. Journal Of Geography and Regional Development Reseach Journal, 13(2), 29-.
Marvi, L.T, Behzadfar, M & Shemirani, S.M.M. (2022). Analysis Smart City Implementation Challenges, Case Study of Mashhad. Journal of Sustainable City, 5(1), 45-58.
Nikpour, A & Hasani, z. (2018). The Physical-Spatial Analysis of Urban Areas Based on the Indicators of the Urban Smart Growth (A Case Study: Babol). Research and Urban Planning, 9(34), 19-30.
Zanganeh, S, Jelogir, M. A, Joshanpour, M & Azemati, H. (2023). Assessment of the compatibility of urban neighborhoods with smart urban growth principles the case study of city Mashhad. Journal of Sustainable City, 5(4), 27-51.
