Roles of Visual and Linguistic Metadiscourses in Developing Persuasive Infographic Resumes

Subject Areas : Research in English Language Pedagogy

Omid Allaf-Akbary ¹

1 - University of Mohaghegh Ardabili

Received: 2023-03-09 Accepted : 2023-06-03 Published : 2023-06-01

Keywords:

References:

Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. John Benjamins.

Ädel, A., & Mauranen, A. (2010). Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 1-11.

Al-Subhi, A. (2022). Metadiscourse in online advertising: Exploring linguistic and visual metadiscourse in social media advertisements. Journal of Pragmatics, 87(1), 24-40.

Chen. L., & Hu, G. (2020). Mediating knowledge through expressing surprises: A frame-based analysis of surprise markers in research articles across disciplines and research paradigms. Discourse Processes, 57(8), 659-681. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2020.1737348.

Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as a rhetorical act. Peter Lang.

Crismore, A. (2004). Pronouns and metadiscourse as interpersonal rhetorical devices in fundraising letters: A corpus linguistic analysis. In: Connor, U, Upton, TA (Eds.), Discourse in the Professional: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics (pp. 307-330). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 

Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 95-113.

D'Angelo, L., Mauranen, A., & Maci, S. (Ed.). (2021). Metadiscourse in digital communication: new research, approaches, and methodologies. Springer.

DeCarlo, L. (2019). Resumes for dummies (8^th edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Canada.

Dick, M. (2020). The Infographic: A history of data graphics in news and communications. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Esfandiari, R., Allaf-Akbary, O. (2022). Metadiscursive features in research articles: The role of stimulated recall. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 14(29), 245-263. Doi: 10.22034/ELT.2021.51232.2487

Fechine, L. A. R., & Pontes, A. L. (2012). O metadiscurso visual do material interposto de um dicionário em Língua Inglesa. Calidoscópio, 10(3), 294-300.

Gardner, R., & Luchtenberg, S. (2000). Reference, image, text in German and Australian advertising posters. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1807-1821.

Harris, Z. (1959). The transformational model of language structure. Anthropological Linguistics, 1(1), 7-29.

Hyland, K. (2019). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing (2^nd edition). Continuum.

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in scholastic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.

Ionescu-Ruxăndoiu, L., Constantinescu, M., Stoica, G, & Hartular, S. (Ed.). (2022). Attitude and stance in discourse. London.

Kashiha, H. (2022). Academic lectures versus political speeches: Metadiscourse functions affected by the role of the audience. Journal of Pragmatics, 190, 60–72.

Kostelnick, C., Roberts, D., & Dragga, S. (1998). Designing visual language: Strategies for professional communicators. Longman.

Kumpf,  P.E.  (2000).  Visual  metadiscourse: Designing the considerate text. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9(4), 401-424

Kumpf,  P.E.  (2000).  Visual  metadiscourse: Designing the considerate text. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9(4), 401-424

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality. A semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.

Kumpf, P. E.  (2000). Visual metadiscourse: Designing the considerate text. Technical Communication Quarterly, 9(4), 401-424.

Ledin, P., & Machin, D. (2020). Introduction to multimodal analysis (2^nd edition). Bloomsbury Publishing.

Li, M. (2021). Researching and teaching second language writing in the digital age. Macmillan.

Mancini, C. (2005). Cinematic hypertext. Investigating a new paradigm (Vol. 122). IOS Press.

Paolucci, C. (2021). Cognitive semiotics. minds, meaning, and cognition. Dordrecht: Springer.

Povolná, R. (2020). Persuasion in technical discourse: The role of interpersonal metadiscourse markers in user manuals. Persuasion in Specialized Discourses, 229-262.

Smith-Worthington, D, & Jefferson, S. (2018). Technical writing for success (4^th edition). Cengage Learning.

Tompkins, K. (2020). Resume writing simplified: Removing the guesswork so you can achieve optimal results. Amazon Digital Services.

Tseng, M., & Liu, C. (2021). Paradigmatic variation in hedging and boosting: A comparative study of discussions in narrative inquiry and grounded theory research. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 61, 1-16.

Tufte, E. R. (2001). The Visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press.

Vande Kopple, W. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36, 82-93.

Vande Kopple, W. (2002). Metadiscourse, discourse, and issues in composition and rhetoric. In E. Barton, & G. Stygall (Eds.), Discourse studies in composition (pp. 91-113). Hampton Press.

Yoon, H., & Römer, U. (2020). Quantifying disciplinary voices: an automated approach to interactional metadiscourse in successful student writing. Written Communication, 2(9), 1- 37.

Zhang, G., & Parvaresh V. (2019). Elastic language in persuasion and comforting. Palgrave.