Design for Disassembly and Shifting to Eco-Friendly Architecture

Subject Areas : Architecture and urbanism

Seyed Mehdi  Amirkiaei ¹ (Department of Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Seyed Majid  Mofidi Shemirani ² (Department of Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Mohammadjavad  Mahdavinejad ³ (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran  (Corresponding Author).)
Mohammadmehdi  Raissamiei ⁴ (Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Art, Guilan University, Rasht, Iran)

Received: 2017-07-24 Accepted : 2017-10-25 Published : 2020-02-20

Keywords: Eco-friendly architecture, Designerly approach to energy efficiency, Construction and demolition waste (C&DW), Design for disassembly, high-performance architecture, Life cycle assessment (LCA),

Abstract :

Background and Purpose: Construction and demolition waste management is one the controversial issues in building industry. The “hidden water” and the “hidden energy” of building material are from among the most important issues in designerly approach to energy efficiency under the high-performance architecture theory. The aim of the research is to outline the concept of design for disassembly in order to minimize construction and demolition waste (C&DW) and facilitate appropriate disposal.  Materials and Methods: Descriptive-analytical method has been adopted in which description of the theoretical concepts has merged with an analytical approach to the expert opinions. Results: Studies have shown that the successful cases in the framework of design for disassembly were deliberately designed with dismantling prediction from the early stage of the design process. Integrated approach toward the life cycle is the key factor in eco-friendly design and construction which is based on recycling, creative reuse, repurposing and upcycling strategies as a part of “green aesthetics”. Discussion and Conclusions:The concept of design for disassembly rots from flexibility in architectural design process and is an influential procedure for C&DW. The life cycle assessment (LCA) is a comprehensive methodology to address gains of the concept of design for disassembly. Moreover it has showed a meaningful relationship between design for disassembly and the environmental impacts which might be addressed as designerly approach to energy efficiency. 

References:

1. Mahdavinejad M, Hosseini SA. Data mining and content analysis of the jury citations of the Pritzker Architecture prize (1977–2017). Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 2019;43(1):71.


2. Mahdavinejad M. Designerly Approach to Energy Efficiency in High-Performance Architecture Theory. Naqshejahan - Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2020;10(2):75-83. [Persian]


3. Mahdavinejad M. High-Performance Architecture: Search for Future Legacy in Contemporary Iranian Architecture. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 2017; 9(17):129-138. [Persian]


4. Mohtashami N, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M. Contribution of city prosperity to decisions on healthy building design: A case study of Tehran. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2016;5(3):319-31.


5. Javanroodi K, Nik VM, Mahdavinejad M. A novel design-based optimization framework for enhancing the energy efficiency of high-rise office buildings in urban areas. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019; 49:101597.


6. Kia A, Mahdavinejad M. Interactive Form-Generation in High-Performance Architecture Theory. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development. 2020; 10(2):37-48.


7. Mahdavinejad M, Bitaab N. From Smart-Eco Building to High-Performance Architecture: Optimization of Energy Consumption in Architecture of Developing Countries. E&ES. 2017; 83(1): 012020.


8. Fallahtafti R, Mahdavinejad M. Optimisation of building shape and orientation for better energy efficient architecture. International Journal of Energy Sector Management. 2015; 9(4): 593-618.


9. Mahdavinejad M, Zia A, Larki AN, Ghanavati S, Elmi N. Dilemma of green and pseudo green architecture based on LEED norms in case of developing countries. International journal of sustainable built environment, 2014;3(2):235-46.


10. Qasemi E, Mahdavinejad M, Aliabadi M, Zarkesh A. Leaf Venation Patterns as a Model for Bioinspired fog harvesting. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2020 Jun 15:125170.


11. Crowther, ph., 2014. Investigating Design for Disassembly through Creative Practice., INTERSECTIONS: Expertise, Academic Research and Design, International Symposium., Florence (Italy).


12. Sturgess, D., 2009. An Architecture of Disassembly and Cyclical Material Life, a thesis presented to Ryerson university for degree of Master of Architecture, university of waterloo, 2012, 17,29.


13. Papokyriakou, A., Hopkinson, L., 2012. The Potential Of Integration Design For Deconstraction as a Waste Minimization Strategy in to the Profession of Architect, Proceedings of 2 nd conference - People and Buildings, London Metropolitan University, London, Uk.


14. Nikghadam, N., Mofidi, S, M., Localization of Design Method with Considering Deconstruction in Iran, International Building and Development Conference, Science and research Branch, Islamic Azad University., Winter 2014., Isfahan, Iran


15. Saghafi, M. J., Teshnizi, Z. A. H., 2011. Building Deconstruction and Material Recovery in Iran: an analysis of major determinants, ELSEVIER, Procedia Engineering 21, International conference on Green Building and sustainable cities, 853-863.                     


16. Khawaja, N.A. A Methodology for Total Life-Cycle Costing of Buildings Designed for Disassembly.Thesis for Master of Applied Science, Concordia University, 2005, 52.


17. Sigrid Nordby,A., 2009, Salvageability of building materials Reasons, criteria and consequences regarding architectural designthat facilitate reuse and recycling, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 2005, 20,22.


18. Webster, M., D, Gumpertz, S, Inc, H, Costello, D.T., 2005. Designing structural Systems for Deconstruction: How to Extend a New Building ̓s useful Life and Prevent it from Going to waste when the End finally comes.Green build Conference Atlanta, GA, Georgia.    


19. Silverstein,S. A., and Appkiying.,. Design for Disassembly to connection design in steel Structures. Thesis for Master of engineering in civil and environmental engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009, 6.     


20. Durmisevic, E. Transformable Building Structures, Design for disassembly as a way to introduce sustainable engineering to building design & construction. University of Delft, 2006, 103.


21. Isik, A. Disassembly and Re-use of Building Materials: A Case Study on Salvaged Timber Component,s., Master of Science. The Middle East Technical University, 2003, 6,39.    


22. Mahmoudi, M, M., Nikghadam, N., 2009. Architectural Design Considering Deconstruction and Reinstallation of Elements. Journal of Fine Arts Vol 39, PP 25-36.     


23. Macozoma, Dennis S., 2002.Understanding the concept of flexibility in Design for Deconstraction., CSIRB&CTechnology,Seeinformationin:https://www.irb.fraunhofer.de.          


24. Zobusova, D. Design for Deconstruction, Bachlor of Architectural Technology and Construction Management, VIA University College, 2014, 11,14.   


25. Dodoo, A. life Cycle Primary Energy Use and Carbon Emission of Residential Buildings. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Mid Sweden University, 2011,14.    


26. Endicott, B., Fiato, A. , Foster, S. , Huang, T., Totev, P., 2005. Research on Building Deconstruction, CE 268 Civil Systems and the Environment, University of California, Berkeley.  


27. Cakici,F.z. The process and Feasibility of building Deconstruction A case study in Ankara, Thesis for Master of science in building science in Architecture, Middle east Technical university. 2005, 8,12,18,19.                 


28. Jaillon,L., Poon, GS., 2014. Life cycle design and prefabrication in Buildings: A review and case studies in HongKong. Elsevier, Automation in Construction vol 39, pp 195-202.     


29. Horner. R.M.W., Simon, M., Haram, M.Ei., 2007. Cradle-to-cradle - A concept for the disposal of Buildings at the End of their Lives?. International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment, Glasgow, Scotland. 


30. Kibert, CH.J., Chini, A.R., Languell, J., 2001. Deconstruction as An Essential Component Of Sustainable Construction. CIB World Building Congress, Wellington, New Zealand.       


31. Barkkume, A., 2008. Deconstruction and Design for Disassembly Newjersey Institute of Tecnology.Newjersey school of Architecture, See information in: http://www.academia.edu/178424.    


32. Crowther, Ph., 2000. Building Disassembly and the Lessons of Industrial Ecology, Shaping the Millennium: Collaborative Approaches. CIB, EPA, QUT, CSIRO-Brisbane, Australia.


33. Thormak, C., Recycling Potential and Design for Disassembly in Buildings, See information in: http://portal.research.lu.se/portal/files/4809710/1693314.pdf.   


34. Chiodo, J., 2005. Design for Disassembly Guidelines., Active Disassembly Research, See information in: http://www.activedisassembly.com


35. Chini, A. R., 2001. Deconstruction and Materials Reuse:Technology, Economic, and policy., CIB publication 266.,CIB T Group 39 world Building Congress, university of Florida ., Newzealand