• الصفحة الرئيسية
  • طراحی با روش واسازی و مزایای آن در کاهش ضایعات ساخت و تخریب و حفظ محیط زیست

شارک

عنوان URL للمقالة


رقم المقالة : JEST-1707-3764 (R3) زيارة : 141 الصفحة: 277 - 289

10.22034/jest.2020.29026.3764

نوع المخطوط: ابحاث

طراحی با روش واسازی و مزایای آن در کاهش ضایعات ساخت و تخریب و حفظ محیط زیست

الموضوعات :

سید مهدی امیرکیایی 1 , سید مجید مفیدی شمیرانی 2 , محمد جواد مهدوی نژاد 3 , محمد مهدی رییس سمیعی 4

1 - گروه معماری، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
2 - استادیار گروه معماری، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
3 - دانشیار گروه معماری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران
4 - استادیار گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و هنر، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.

تاريخ الإرسال : 01 الإثنين , ذو القعدة, 1438 تاريخ التأكيد : 05 الأربعاء , صفر, 1439 تاريخ الإصدار : 26 الخميس , جمادى الثانية, 1441

الکلمات المفتاحية: بهره‌وری در مصرف انرژی, معماری دوستدار طبیعت, چرخه عمر مفید ساختمان, رویکرد طراحی مینا, معماری سرآمد,

ملخص المقالة :

زمینه و هدف: مصرف زیاد منابع خام در صنعت ساختمان، و آب و انرژی پنهان آن ها، موجب آلودگی و تخریب محیط زیست می شود. هدف از پژوهش، توسعه نظریه معماری سرآمد و تبیین روش های دوستدارمحیط زیست، در تخریب ساختمان و کاربست مجدد مصالح یا بهیافت، متناسب با چرخه عمر مفید ساختمان است. روش بررسی: روش تحقیق پژوهش، توصیفی تحلیلی است. در بیان مفاهیم نظری از روش توصیفی استفاده شده و بر اساس روش تحلیل کیفی مبتنی بر نظرات کارشناسی، این مفاهیم بسط داده شده اند. یافته ها: تحلیل ها نشان می دهند که یکی از روش های پایدار در طراحی و اجرا ساختمان، پیش بینی اصل ِواسازی است. طراحی انعطاف پذیر امکان بازاستفاده از مصالح ساختمانی را فراهم کرده و امکان مدیریت مصالح با قابلیت بازاستفاده خلاقانه، بهیافت و بازیافت را به عنوان بخشی از زیبایی شناسی سبز مقدور می سازد. نگاه هولیستیک و رویکرد یکپارچه به فرآیند طراحی، اجرا و تخریب آثار معماری، موضوع کلیدی در موفقیت محسوب می شوند. بحث و نتیجه گیری: اصل واسازی نوعی انعطاف پذیری در الگوی معماری دوستدار طبیعت و زیست سازگار است، که بر استفاده مجدد از مصالح پس از پایان عمر مفید ساختمان تاکید می کند. تاکید بر ترسیم طرحواره‎ای جامع نگر از مراحل اولیه فرآیند طراحی معماری، از نوعی نگاه معمارانه و رویکرد طراحی مینا به بهره وری در مصرف انرژی سرچشمه می گیرد.

المصادر:


  1. Mahdavinejad M, Hosseini SA. Data mining and content analysis of the jury citations of the Pritzker Architecture prize (1977–2017). Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 2019;43(1):71.
    2.
  2. Mahdavinejad M. Designerly Approach to Energy Efficiency in High-Performance Architecture Theory. Naqshejahan - Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2020;10(2):75-83. [Persian]
    3.
  3. Mahdavinejad M. High-Performance Architecture: Search for Future Legacy in Contemporary Iranian Architecture. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 2017; 9(17):129-138. [Persian]
    4.
  4. Mohtashami N, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M. Contribution of city prosperity to decisions on healthy building design: A case study of Tehran. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2016;5(3):319-31.
    5.
  5. Javanroodi K, Nik VM, Mahdavinejad M. A novel design-based optimization framework for enhancing the energy efficiency of high-rise office buildings in urban areas. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019; 49:101597.
    6.
  6. Kia A, Mahdavinejad M. Interactive Form-Generation in High-Performance Architecture Theory. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development. 2020; 10(2):37-48.
    7.
  7. Mahdavinejad M, Bitaab N. From Smart-Eco Building to High-Performance Architecture: Optimization of Energy Consumption in Architecture of Developing Countries. E&ES. 2017; 83(1): 012020.
    8.
  8. Fallahtafti R, Mahdavinejad M. Optimisation of building shape and orientation for better energy efficient architecture. International Journal of Energy Sector Management. 2015; 9(4): 593-618.
    9.
  9. Mahdavinejad M, Zia A, Larki AN, Ghanavati S, Elmi N. Dilemma of green and pseudo green architecture based on LEED norms in case of developing countries. International journal of sustainable built environment, 2014;3(2):235-46.
    10.
  10. Qasemi E, Mahdavinejad M, Aliabadi M, Zarkesh A. Leaf Venation Patterns as a Model for Bioinspired fog harvesting. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2020 Jun 15:125170.
    11.
  11. Crowther, ph., 2014. Investigating Design for Disassembly through Creative Practice., INTERSECTIONS: Expertise, Academic Research and Design, International Symposium., Florence (Italy).
    12.
  12. Sturgess, D., 2009. An Architecture of Disassembly and Cyclical Material Life, a thesis presented to Ryerson university for degree of Master of Architecture, university of waterloo, 2012, 17,29.
    13.
  13. Papokyriakou, A., Hopkinson, L., 2012. The Potential Of Integration Design For Deconstraction as a Waste Minimization Strategy in to the Profession of Architect, Proceedings of 2 nd conference - People and Buildings, London Metropolitan University, London, Uk.
    14.
  14. Nikghadam, N., Mofidi, S, M., Localization of Design Method with Considering Deconstruction in Iran, International Building and Development Conference, Science and research Branch, Islamic Azad University., Winter 2014., Isfahan, Iran
    15.
  15. Saghafi, M. J., Teshnizi, Z. A. H., 2011. Building Deconstruction and Material Recovery in Iran: an analysis of major determinants, ELSEVIER, Procedia Engineering 21, International conference on Green Building and sustainable cities, 853-863.                     
    16.
  16. Khawaja, N.A. A Methodology for Total Life-Cycle Costing of Buildings Designed for Disassembly.Thesis for Master of Applied Science, Concordia University, 2005, 52.
    17.
  17. Sigrid Nordby,A., 2009, Salvageability of building materials Reasons, criteria and consequences regarding architectural designthat facilitate reuse and recycling, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 2005, 20,22.
    18.
  18. Webster, M., D, Gumpertz, S, Inc, H, Costello, D.T., 2005. Designing structural Systems for Deconstruction: How to Extend a New Building ̓s useful Life and Prevent it from Going to waste when the End finally comes.Green build Conference Atlanta, GA, Georgia.    
    19.
  19. Silverstein,S. A., and Appkiying.,. Design for Disassembly to connection design in steel Structures. Thesis for Master of engineering in civil and environmental engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009, 6.     
    20.
  20. Durmisevic, E. Transformable Building Structures, Design for disassembly as a way to introduce sustainable engineering to building design & construction. University of Delft, 2006, 103.
    21.
  21. Isik, A. Disassembly and Re-use of Building Materials: A Case Study on Salvaged Timber Component,s., Master of Science. The Middle East Technical University, 2003, 6,39.    
    22.
  22. Mahmoudi, M, M., Nikghadam, N., 2009. Architectural Design Considering Deconstruction and Reinstallation of Elements. Journal of Fine Arts Vol 39, PP 25-36.     
    23.
  23. Macozoma, Dennis S., 2002.Understanding the concept of flexibility in Design for Deconstraction., CSIRB&CTechnology,Seeinformationin:https://www.irb.fraunhofer.de.          
    24.
  24. Zobusova, D. Design for Deconstruction, Bachlor of Architectural Technology and Construction Management, VIA University College, 2014, 11,14.   
    25.
  25. Dodoo, A. life Cycle Primary Energy Use and Carbon Emission of Residential Buildings. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Mid Sweden University, 2011,14.    
    26.
  26. Endicott, B., Fiato, A. , Foster, S. , Huang, T., Totev, P., 2005. Research on Building Deconstruction, CE 268 Civil Systems and the Environment, University of California, Berkeley.  
    27.
  27. Cakici,F.z. The process and Feasibility of building Deconstruction A case study in Ankara, Thesis for Master of science in building science in Architecture, Middle east Technical university. 2005, 8,12,18,19.                 
    28.
  28. Jaillon,L., Poon, GS., 2014. Life cycle design and prefabrication in Buildings: A review and case studies in HongKong. Elsevier, Automation in Construction vol 39, pp 195-202.     
    29.
  29. Horner. R.M.W., Simon, M., Haram, M.Ei., 2007. Cradle-to-cradle - A concept for the disposal of Buildings at the End of their Lives?. International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment, Glasgow, Scotland. 
    30.
  30. Kibert, CH.J., Chini, A.R., Languell, J., 2001. Deconstruction as An Essential Component Of Sustainable Construction. CIB World Building Congress, Wellington, New Zealand.       
    31.
  31. Barkkume, A., 2008. Deconstruction and Design for Disassembly Newjersey Institute of Tecnology.Newjersey school of Architecture, See information in: http://www.academia.edu/178424.    
    32.
  32. Crowther, Ph., 2000. Building Disassembly and the Lessons of Industrial Ecology, Shaping the Millennium: Collaborative Approaches. CIB, EPA, QUT, CSIRO-Brisbane, Australia.
    33.
  33. Thormak, C., Recycling Potential and Design for Disassembly in Buildings, See information in: http://portal.research.lu.se/portal/files/4809710/1693314.pdf.   
    34.
  34. Chiodo, J., 2005. Design for Disassembly Guidelines., Active Disassembly Research, See information in: http://www.activedisassembly.com
    35.
  35. Chini, A. R., 2001. Deconstruction and Materials Reuse:Technology, Economic, and policy., CIB publication 266.,CIB T Group 39 world Building Congress, university of Florida ., Newzealand
    36.

 

 

_||_

  1. Mahdavinejad M, Hosseini SA. Data mining and content analysis of the jury citations of the Pritzker Architecture prize (1977–2017). Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 2019;43(1):71.
    2.
  2. Mahdavinejad M. Designerly Approach to Energy Efficiency in High-Performance Architecture Theory. Naqshejahan - Basic studies and New Technologies of Architecture and Planning. 2020;10(2):75-83. [Persian]
    3.
  3. Mahdavinejad M. High-Performance Architecture: Search for Future Legacy in Contemporary Iranian Architecture. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 2017; 9(17):129-138. [Persian]
    4.
  4. Mohtashami N, Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M. Contribution of city prosperity to decisions on healthy building design: A case study of Tehran. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2016;5(3):319-31.
    5.
  5. Javanroodi K, Nik VM, Mahdavinejad M. A novel design-based optimization framework for enhancing the energy efficiency of high-rise office buildings in urban areas. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019; 49:101597.
    6.
  6. Kia A, Mahdavinejad M. Interactive Form-Generation in High-Performance Architecture Theory. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development. 2020; 10(2):37-48.
    7.
  7. Mahdavinejad M, Bitaab N. From Smart-Eco Building to High-Performance Architecture: Optimization of Energy Consumption in Architecture of Developing Countries. E&ES. 2017; 83(1): 012020.
    8.
  8. Fallahtafti R, Mahdavinejad M. Optimisation of building shape and orientation for better energy efficient architecture. International Journal of Energy Sector Management. 2015; 9(4): 593-618.
    9.
  9. Mahdavinejad M, Zia A, Larki AN, Ghanavati S, Elmi N. Dilemma of green and pseudo green architecture based on LEED norms in case of developing countries. International journal of sustainable built environment, 2014;3(2):235-46.
    10.
  10. Qasemi E, Mahdavinejad M, Aliabadi M, Zarkesh A. Leaf Venation Patterns as a Model for Bioinspired fog harvesting. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects. 2020 Jun 15:125170.
    11.
  11. Crowther, ph., 2014. Investigating Design for Disassembly through Creative Practice., INTERSECTIONS: Expertise, Academic Research and Design, International Symposium., Florence (Italy).
    12.
  12. Sturgess, D., 2009. An Architecture of Disassembly and Cyclical Material Life, a thesis presented to Ryerson university for degree of Master of Architecture, university of waterloo, 2012, 17,29.
    13.
  13. Papokyriakou, A., Hopkinson, L., 2012. The Potential Of Integration Design For Deconstraction as a Waste Minimization Strategy in to the Profession of Architect, Proceedings of 2 nd conference - People and Buildings, London Metropolitan University, London, Uk.
    14.
  14. Nikghadam, N., Mofidi, S, M., Localization of Design Method with Considering Deconstruction in Iran, International Building and Development Conference, Science and research Branch, Islamic Azad University., Winter 2014., Isfahan, Iran
    15.
  15. Saghafi, M. J., Teshnizi, Z. A. H., 2011. Building Deconstruction and Material Recovery in Iran: an analysis of major determinants, ELSEVIER, Procedia Engineering 21, International conference on Green Building and sustainable cities, 853-863.                     
    16.
  16. Khawaja, N.A. A Methodology for Total Life-Cycle Costing of Buildings Designed for Disassembly.Thesis for Master of Applied Science, Concordia University, 2005, 52.
    17.
  17. Sigrid Nordby,A., 2009, Salvageability of building materials Reasons, criteria and consequences regarding architectural designthat facilitate reuse and recycling, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 2005, 20,22.
    18.
  18. Webster, M., D, Gumpertz, S, Inc, H, Costello, D.T., 2005. Designing structural Systems for Deconstruction: How to Extend a New Building ̓s useful Life and Prevent it from Going to waste when the End finally comes.Green build Conference Atlanta, GA, Georgia.    
    19.
  19. Silverstein,S. A., and Appkiying.,. Design for Disassembly to connection design in steel Structures. Thesis for Master of engineering in civil and environmental engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009, 6.     
    20.
  20. Durmisevic, E. Transformable Building Structures, Design for disassembly as a way to introduce sustainable engineering to building design & construction. University of Delft, 2006, 103.
    21.
  21. Isik, A. Disassembly and Re-use of Building Materials: A Case Study on Salvaged Timber Component,s., Master of Science. The Middle East Technical University, 2003, 6,39.    
    22.
  22. Mahmoudi, M, M., Nikghadam, N., 2009. Architectural Design Considering Deconstruction and Reinstallation of Elements. Journal of Fine Arts Vol 39, PP 25-36.     
    23.
  23. Macozoma, Dennis S., 2002.Understanding the concept of flexibility in Design for Deconstraction., CSIRB&CTechnology,Seeinformationin:https://www.irb.fraunhofer.de.          
    24.
  24. Zobusova, D. Design for Deconstruction, Bachlor of Architectural Technology and Construction Management, VIA University College, 2014, 11,14.   
    25.
  25. Dodoo, A. life Cycle Primary Energy Use and Carbon Emission of Residential Buildings. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Mid Sweden University, 2011,14.    
    26.
  26. Endicott, B., Fiato, A. , Foster, S. , Huang, T., Totev, P., 2005. Research on Building Deconstruction, CE 268 Civil Systems and the Environment, University of California, Berkeley.  
    27.
  27. Cakici,F.z. The process and Feasibility of building Deconstruction A case study in Ankara, Thesis for Master of science in building science in Architecture, Middle east Technical university. 2005, 8,12,18,19.                 
    28.
  28. Jaillon,L., Poon, GS., 2014. Life cycle design and prefabrication in Buildings: A review and case studies in HongKong. Elsevier, Automation in Construction vol 39, pp 195-202.     
    29.
  29. Horner. R.M.W., Simon, M., Haram, M.Ei., 2007. Cradle-to-cradle - A concept for the disposal of Buildings at the End of their Lives?. International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment, Glasgow, Scotland. 
    30.
  30. Kibert, CH.J., Chini, A.R., Languell, J., 2001. Deconstruction as An Essential Component Of Sustainable Construction. CIB World Building Congress, Wellington, New Zealand.       
    31.
  31. Barkkume, A., 2008. Deconstruction and Design for Disassembly Newjersey Institute of Tecnology.Newjersey school of Architecture, See information in: http://www.academia.edu/178424.    
    32.
  32. Crowther, Ph., 2000. Building Disassembly and the Lessons of Industrial Ecology, Shaping the Millennium: Collaborative Approaches. CIB, EPA, QUT, CSIRO-Brisbane, Australia.
    33.
  33. Thormak, C., Recycling Potential and Design for Disassembly in Buildings, See information in: http://portal.research.lu.se/portal/files/4809710/1693314.pdf.   
    34.
  34. Chiodo, J., 2005. Design for Disassembly Guidelines., Active Disassembly Research, See information in: http://www.activedisassembly.com
    35.
  35. Chini, A. R., 2001. Deconstruction and Materials Reuse:Technology, Economic, and policy., CIB publication 266.,CIB T Group 39 world Building Congress, university of Florida ., Newzealand
    36.

 

 

سند

Sanad is a platform for managing Azad University publications

الروابط

المراكز ذات الصلة

دعامة

الصفحات الرسمية

حقوق هذا الموقع الإلكتروني مملوكة لنظام SANAD Press Management. © 1442-1446

الصفحة الرئيسية| دخول| معلومات عنا| اتصل بنا|
[English] [فارسی] [en] [fa]