The effect of nanosilver oral administration on body function, some blood and biochemical parameters of serum in chickens
Subject Areas : Journal of Comparative Pathobiology
M. Rahim,
1
,
M. Talebi mehrdar,
2
1 - Department of biochemistry, payam noor university, Tehran, iran
2 - Department of biochemistry, payam noor university, Tehran. Iran
Keywords: broiler chicks, Blood biochemical properties, immune system, Silver Nanoparticles,
Abstract :
Silver has long been known for its antibacterial properties. In fact, silver nanoparticles, due to the release of silver ions, show such properties against aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and are widely used as additives in poultry diets. Regarding the antibacterial effects of this compound, research has shown contradictory results that do not indicate beneficial antibacterial effects. For this study, 240 one-day-old male chickens were divided into six groups with four replications. The experimental groups were: control diet (without additives), diet containing 10 ppm of the antibiotic avilamycin, diet containing 400 ml of silver nanoparticles per ton of feed, diet containing 800 ml of silver nanoparticles per ton of feed, diet containing 400 ml of silver nanoparticles per cubic meter of drinking water, diet containing 800 ml of silver nanoparticles per cubic meter of drinking water and to investigate the effect of silver nanoparticles on growth factor and body efficiency and some blood and serum parameters and microbial population of the device Digestive (ileum) of broiler chickens and comparison of antibacterial and growth stimulant effects with avilamycin antibiotic.The results showed a significant increase (P <0.05) in monocytes and chicken feed consumption and an increase in Clostridium population and a significant decrease in triglyceride concentration in the 800 ml group of silver particles in the diet and water (P <0.05), but its effect There was no significant effect on chicken weight gain and feed conversion ratio. Contrary to popular belief, silver nanoparticles are not suitable as a growth stimulant additive to control harmful bacteria in the poultry digestive tract and strengthen the immune system, increasing the feed conversion ratio of broilers.
2.Wakeman, G. W. 2005. AGP alternatives- part II. Dietary strategies to influence bacterial microflora. World Poultry 21: 28-29
3.Percival, S L, P. G. Bowler and D. Russell. 2018. Bacterial resistance to silver in wound care. Journal of Hospital Infection 60: 1–7
4.Sondi, I. and S. B. Sondi. 2019. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for gram-negative bacteria. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 275: 77–182
5.Hoet, P. H., I. Bruske-Hohlfeld and O. V. Salata. 2004. Nanoparticles-known and unknown health risks. Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2: 12-14
6.Hollinger, M. A. 2020. Toxicological aspects of topical silver pharmaceuticals. Critical Review Toxicology 26:255–60
7.Benn, T. M. and P. Westerhoff. 2008. Nanoparticle silver released into water from commercially available sock fabrics. Environmental Science and Technology 42: 4133-4139
8.Zargaran esfahani, H., S. D. Sharifi, A. Barin, and A. Afzalzadeh. 2010. Influence of Silver Nanoparticles on Performance and Carcass Properties of Broiler Chicks. Iranian Journal of Animal science 41:137-141(In Persian).
9.Sawosz, E., M. Binek, M. Grodzik, S. P. Ziellin, M. Szmidt, T. Niemiec and A. Chwaiibog . 2017. Influence of hydrocolloidal silver nanoparticles on gastrointestinal microflora and morphology of enterocytes of quails. Archives of Animal Nutrition 61: 444 – 451
10.Grudzien, M. and E. Sawosz. 2019. The influence of silver nanoparticles on chick embryo development and bursa Fabricius morphology. Journal of Animal Feed and Science 15: 111 – 115
12.Wakeman, G. W. 2016. AGP alternatives- part II. Dietary strategies to influence bacterial microflora. World Poultry 21: 28-29
13.Khosravi, A., F. Boldaji, B. Dastar and S. Hasani. 2017. The Use of Some Feed Additives as Growth Promoter in Broilers Nutrition. International Journal of Poultry Science 7: 1095-1099
14.Sondi, I. and S. B. Sondi. 2015. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for gram-negative bacteria. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 275: 77–182
15.Hoet, P. H., I. Bruske-Hohlfeld and O. V. Salata. 2004. Nanoparticles-known and unknown health risks. Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2: 12-14
16.Vincent, C.H. The direct or breed method for counting bacteria in tomato catsup pulp or paste. Journal of bacteriology. 3(2).
16.Sawosz, E., M. Binek, M. Grodzik, S. P. Ziellin, M. Szmidt, T. Niemiec and A. Chwaiibog . 2010. Influence of hydrocolloidal silver nanoparticles on gastrointestinal microflora and morphology of enterocytes of quails. Archives of Animal Nutrition 61: 444 – 451
17.Atiyeh, B. S., M. Costagliola, S.N. Hayek, and S. A. Dibo. 2018. Effect of silver on burn wound infection control and healing. Review of the Literature Burns 33: 139–148.
18.Fondevila M., R. Herrer, M. C. Casallasa, L. Abeciaa, J. J. Duchab. 2020. Silver nanoparticles as a potential antimicrobial additive for weaned pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 150: 259-269
19.Hoet, P. H., I. Bruske-Hohlfeld and O. V. Salata. 2004. Nanoparticles-known and unknown health risks. Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2: 12-14
20.Scott, D. F. and P. D. Michael. 1987. Sub- therapeutic levels of antibiotics in poultry feeds and their effects on weight gain, feed efficiency, and bacterial cholyltaurine hydrolase activity. Applied Environmental microbiology 331-336.
_||_