the Effect of Artificial Intelligence Literacy on Artificial Intelligence Anxiety: the Mediating Role of Perceived Cognitive Load
Subject Areas :
1 -
Keywords: A Literacy, A I Anxiety, Cognitive Load,
Abstract :
The purpose of this research was to Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Literacy on Artificial Intelligence Anxiety by mediating Cognitive Load On. The method of the current research was descriptive-correlation with emphasis on structural equation modelling. The statistical population of the research was all postgraduate students (320) (master's and doctoral) of the Islamic Azad University, Kazerun Branch. Based on the Krejci and Morgan table, 175 people were selected as the statistical sample of the research using simple random sampling. Data was collected using AI Anxiety scale (Wang and Wang, 2022), AI literacy scale (wang 2023) and cognitive load questionnaire (Oktaviyanthi2024). The reliability of the questionnaires was assessed using the Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient, which was equal to .89, .91, and .87 respectively. Data analysis was done with SPSS 24 and SPLS 3 software. The results showed that AI literacy has an effect on cognitive load, cognitive load has an effect on AI anxiety, and the effect of AI literacy on AI anxiety is significant (P<0.01). Also, examining the indirect effect showed that cognitive load plays a mediating role in the relationship between AI literacy and AI anxiety.
References
Allen L. K., Kendeou P. ED-AI Lit: An interdisciplinary framework for AI literacy in education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2024;11(1):3–10. doi: 10.1177/23727322231220339. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Ayduğ, D., & Altınpulluk, H. (2025). Are Turkish pre-service teachers worried about AI? A study on AI anxiety and digital literacy. AI & SOCIETY, 1-12.
Belda-Medina J., Calvo-Ferrer J. R. Using chatbots as AI conversational partners in language learning. Applied Sciences. 2022;12(17):8427. doi: 10.3390/app12178427. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Brougham, D., & Haar, J. (2023). Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace. Journal of Management & Organization, 29(1), 1-18. [Recent workplace AI anxiety study]
Cengiz, S., & Peker, A. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence acceptance and artificial intelligence anxiety among university students: the sequential mediating role of attitudes toward artificial intelligence and literacy. Current Psychology, 44(9), 7991-8000.
Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., & Hwang, G. J. (2022). Application and theory development of artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review. Educational Technology & Society, 25(1), 130–146. [https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202201.12](https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202201.12)
Cheng, X., Zhang, X., & Cohen, J. (2023). Human vs. algorithm: How cognitive load influences trust in AI decision-making. Computers in Human Behavior, 142, 107632. [Cognitive load & AI trust]
Feng, L. (2024). Investigating the Effects of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Language Learning Strategies on Cognitive Load and Learning Outcomes: A Comparative Study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(8), 1741-1774. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241268349 (Original work published 2025)
Herm, L. V. (2023). Impact of explainable ai on cognitive load: Insights from an empirical study. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08861.
Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Ma, J., & Yang, J. (2021). What to teach? Strategies for developing digital literacy in pre-service teacher education. Computers & Education, 169, 104212. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212)
Johnson DG, Verdicchio M (2017) AI anxiety. J Am Soc Inf Sci 68(9):2267–2270. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23867
Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need? *Educational Psychology Review, 23*(1), 1–19. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7)
Kaya F, Aydin F, Schepman A, Rodway P, Yetişensoy O, Demir Kaya M (2022) The roles of personality traits, AI anxiety, and demographic factors in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. Int J Human-Comput Interaction. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730
Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). [https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727](https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727)
Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. *Learning and Instruction, 60,* 225–236. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007)
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38 (1), 43–52. [https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801\_6](https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6)
Ng, W. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. *Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2,* 100009. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100009](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100009)
Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. *Journal of Educational Psychology, 86*(1), 122–133. [https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122](https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122)
Plass, J. L., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Four ways of considering instructional design to support cognitive load. *Educational Psychology Review, 31*(2), 339–347. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09466-1](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09466-1)
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2022). *Motivation in education: Theory, research, and practice* (5th ed.). Pearson.
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). AI literacy and its impact on digital readiness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 39, 100512. [Meta-analysis on AI training]
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. *Cognitive Science, 12*(2), 257–285. [https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202\_4](https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4)
Xie, H., Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Wang, C. C. (2023). AI-based learning analytics in educational technology research: Theoretical perspectives and research trends. *Computers & Education, 182,* 104463. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104463)
Yuen, A. H. K., Park, J., Chen, L., & Cheng, M. (2021). Knowledge, attitudes, and anxiety of university students toward artificial intelligence. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100014)
Zhang, B., & Dafoe, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: American attitudes and trends. Center for the Governance of AI, Future of Humanity Institute, University of Oxford. [https://governanceai.eu](https://governanceai.eu)
Zhang, Q., Nie, H., Fan, J., & Liu, H. (2025). Exploring the dynamics of artificial intelligence literacy on english as a foreign language learners’ willingness to communicate: The critical mediating roles of artificial intelligence learning self-efficacy and classroom anxiety. Behavioral Sciences, 15(4), 523.
Zhang, X., & Zhu, F. (2022). How AI literacy reduces anxiety and increases adoption intention. Journal of Business Research, 145, 180–191. [AI literacy & anxiety
