Urban policymaking as an effective factor in shaping architecture and students' behavior in educational environments
Subject Areas : UrbanismFaezeh Khedmatgozar 1 , azadeh shahcheraghi 2 , Saeid Izadi 3
1 - Department of Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of Urban Design, Boali Sina University, Hamadan, Iran
Keywords: Urban policy, behavior, co-construction, educational environments.,
Abstract :
The upcoming research in the introduction section refers to the expression of the co-construction components of architecture and behavior. Components such as solitude, crowding, personal space, personalized space, territoriality, systems of human territories, and mental images and spatial behavior have been introduced as components that shape co-construction. The related question is mentioned as research about the reflection of the internal structure of co-construction in social norms. The nature and purpose of territoriality and repetition of similar behavioral patterns as an active process of perception have been mentioned in the form of theoretical foundations of research. In this research, urban policy-making is investigated as an effective factor in the co-construction of architecture and behavior in educational environments. Educational environments are recognized not only as spaces for learning but also as a part of the urban ecosystem, which is formed by urban and architectural policies. This research examines how urban policies affect the design of educational spaces and analyzes its effects on the behavior of users, including students, teachers, and staff. Policies related to urban development, spatial distribution of schools, and design standards play an important role in creating spaces that facilitate or limit social behaviors, learning, and interaction in these environments. The findings show that urban policymaking can guide architects to design more efficient spaces and help improve educational and social behaviors.
- Aiello, J. R. And Jones, T. D. C. (1971). Field Study of Proxemic Behaviour of Young Schoolchildren in Three Subcultural Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19:351-356.
- Alexander, C. (1979). The Timeless Way of Building. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Alexander, C. Et al. (1977). A Pattern Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Appleyard, D. (1980). Why Buildings are known: A Predictive Tool for Architects and Planners. In Broadbent, G., Bunt, R. And Loren’s, T. (eds), Meaning and Behavior in the Built Environment. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
- Argyle, M. (1994). The Psychology of Interpersonal Behavior (5th edh). London. Penguin.
- Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological Psychology: Concepts and Methods for Studying the Environment of Human Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Boudon, P. (1972). Lived-in Architecture. London: Lund Humphries.
- Canter, D. And Lee, T. (eds) (1974). Psychology and the Built Environment. London: The Architectural Press.
- Daley, J. (1969). A Philosophical Critique of Behaviorism in Architectural Design. In Broadbent, G. And Ward, A. (eds), Design Method in Architecture. London: Lund Humphries.
- Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in Public Places. New York: Glencoe Free Press.
- Hertzberger, H. (1971). Looking for the Beach Under the Pavement. RIBA Journal, 78(8).
- Hertzberger, H. (1991). Lessons for Students in Architecture (trans. Ina Rike). Rotterdam: Uitgeverij 010.
- Hillier, B. (1996). The Space is the Machine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B. And Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Honikman, B. (1971). An Investigation of a Method for Studying Personal Evaluation and Requirement of the Built Environment. In Honikman, B. (ed.). AP70: Proceedings of the Architectural Psychology Conference at Kingston Polytechnic. London: RIBA.
- Kulleer, R. And Lindstren, C. (1992). Health and Behavior of Children in Classrooms with and Without Windows. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12:305-318.
- Lawson, B. R. (1994). Architects Are Losing out in the Professional Divide. Architects' Journal, 199(16): 0-14. - Lawson, B. R. (1994). Design in Mind. Oxford: Butterworth Architecture.
- Lawson, B. R. (1997). How Designers Think (3rd edh). Oxford: Architectural Press.
- Lawson, B. R. And Spencer, C. P. (1978). Architectural Intentions and User Responses: The Psychology Building at Sheffield. Architects' Journal, 167(18).
- Lawson, B. R. And Walters, D. (1974). The Effects of A New Motorway on an Established Residential Area. In Canter, D. And Lee, T. (eds), Psychology and the Built Environment, pp. 132-138. London: The Architectural Press.
- Malmberg, T. (1980). Human Territoriality. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
- Osmond, H. (1959). The Relationship Between Architect and Pyschia, trist. In Goshen, C.(ed), Psychiatric Architecture. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.
- Proshansky, H. M., Ittleson, W. H. And Rivlin, L. G. (eds) (1970). Environmental Psychology. Holt Rinehart Winston.
- Rapoport, A. (1982). The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
- Rose, D. (1995). A Portrait of the Brain. In Gregory, R., Harris, J., Heard, P. And Rose, D. (eds), The Artful Eve, pp. 28-51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Stirling, J. (1965). An Architect's Approach to Architecture. RIBA Journal, 72(5).
Sommer, R. (1969). Personal Space: The Behavioral Basis of Design. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
- Steinzor, B. (1950). The Spatial Factor in Face-to-Face Discussion Groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45: 552-555.
- Trompenaars, F. And Hampden-Turner, D. (1997). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business. London: Nicholas Brealey.
- Walter, M. A. H. B. (1978). The Territorial and the Social: Perspectives on the Lack of Community in Highrise/High-density Living in Singapore. Ekistics, 270: 236-242.
- Watson, O. M. And Graves, T. D. (1966). Quantitative Research in Proxemic Behavior. American Anthropologist, 68: 971-985.
- Wilson, M. A. (1996). The Socialization of Architectural Preference. Journal of Environmental (Psychology, 16:33-44.
- Wohlwill, J. F. (1974). Human Response to Levels of Environmental Stimulation. Human Ecology, 2: 127-147.