Presentation of Conceptual Model Factors Affecting the Quality of Teaching of Professors of University of Farhangian with a Basis Based Data Theory Approach

Subject Areas : Education

maryam salehizadeh ¹ (Ph.D. Student in Management of Higher Education / Tehran Science and Research Unit)
Nadergholi Ghourchian ² (Department of Educational Management. Faculty of Management and Economics. Tehran University of Science and Research)
amir hossein mohammad davoudi ³ (aDepartment of management, college of human science, Saveh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran)

Received: 2018-08-06 Accepted : 2020-08-17 Published : 2020-08-22

Keywords: "Teaching Quality", "University of Cultural Studies", " Foundation Data Theory",

Abstract :

The purpose of this research is to provide a conceptual model based on the factors affecting the quality of professional teaching of professors of Farhangian University with an approach based on the data theory of the foundation. This is done by conducting a qualitative research of the type of data theory, the method of which is exploratory. In this research, in order to overcome the shortcomings of past research, using a qualitative approach and using the theory of data foundation, we developed a comprehensive model that includes the internal and external factors affecting the quality of the faculty members of the Farhangian University from the data-based method and in a systematic way (Open, axial, and selective coding) were analyzed. In order to complete the expected competencies of professors' teaching, an interview was conducted among experts in the field of higher education and scientific elites of Farhangian University. A total of 17 people were selected as Snowball. To obtain validity and validity of the data, two methods of reviewing the participants and reviewing non-participating experts in the study were used. Data were analyzed by content analysis. Finally, a model with ten factors of motivational factors, social factors, environmental factors, economic factors, cultural factors, personal and personal factors, academic and managerial factors, scientific and educational factors, technological factors and international factors were extracted. The main issue of the present study is the quality of university professors teaching that is mentioned in ten dimensions and according to the circumstances, the underlying conditions and the conditions of the mediation of the strategies are formulated and the final model is presented based on it.

References:

 

 

• Asadi, Mohammad and Gholami, Hamid (2015). Synthesis Research on the Effective Teaching Pattern in Higher Education, Quarterly Journal of Educational Planning Studies, Vol 5, No 9, Pages 144-113.[in Persian]


• Asayesh, H., Mostafa, Gh. Safari, M., Burgahi, R., Rezapur, A., Mansourian, M. And Taqavi, A (2011). Factors Affecting Academic and Research Activities of Faculty Members of Golestan University of Medical Sciences. Education in medical sciences293-295. .[in Persian]


• Askari, Fariba, Mahjub Moodb, Hagar. (2010). Comparison of Effective Teaching Features from Students' Viewpoints of Guilan University of Medical Sciences. Magazine Center for Medical Education Development and Development. Volume 7, Issue 1, 33-26.[in Persian]


• Babaee Charmate, Sikineh and Darris, Jamila. (2010). Investigation and Identification of Falling Factors in the Lesson of Logic and Philosophy of the Third Semester of Literature and Nursing in the Region of Bandar Mom Khomeini (RA). Quarterly Journal of Islamic Education, Vol. 23, Issue 2, Pages 44-50.[in Persian]


• Babboli, M., and Rhetoric, S. R (2016). Study of the Relationship between Spiritual Spirituality and Spiritual Intelligence with the Quality of Teaching of Secondary Teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies 13 (23). 1-20.[in Persian]


• Behnamfar, Reza (2013). The Fan of Expression in Teaching; Forgotten Element, Iranian Journal of Medical Education, pp. 623-625.[in Persian]


• Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4th Edition. Boston: Pearson Publication.


• Danaie Fard, Hasan and Islami, Azar (2011), Creating an Organizational Difference Theory: Using the Research Strategy of the Theory of Fundamentals in Action, Tehran, Imam Sadiq University, First Edition.[in Persian]


• Devlin M, Samarawickrema G. (2010). The criteria of effectiveteaching in a changing higher education context. Higher Education Research and Development.29(2):111-24.


• Devlin M. (2007). Improving teaching in tertiary education: Institutional and individual influences. Keynote address at Excellence in Education and Training Convention. Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore; 55.


• Farghzadeh, Nafiseh, Kashi, Ali. (2014). The study of the methods and tools of virtual education in order to improve the quality of education from the viewpoints of the professors of Khodabandeh Azad University. Journal of Research in New Approach in Educational Management, 5 (17), 121-152.[in Persian]


• Gaertner H. (2014). Effects of student feedback as a method of self-evaluating the quality of teaching. Stud Educ Eval. 42:91-9.


• Gorard, S., & Taylor, C. (2004). Combining methods in educational and social research. New York: Open University Press.


• Gorouipour, Ameneh (2011). Investigating the Relationship Between Scientific Outcomes and Teaching Quality of the Faculty Members of Isfahan University, Master's thesis of Educational Planning, Isfahan University.[in Persian]


• Gove, A., & Dubeck, M. M. (2016). Assess Reading Early to Inform Instruction, Improve Quality, and Realize Possibilities. In Annual Review of Comparative and International Education (pp. 81-88). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. ‏


• Hancock, L. (2011). Why are Finland’s schools successful? Retrieved from www.smithsonianmag.com/people-places/Why-Are-Finlands- SchoolsSuccessful.html


• Harland T, Raja Hussain RM, Bakar AA. (2014). The scholarship of teaching and learning: Challenges for Malaysian academics. Teach High Educ.19(1):38-48.


• Hooman, Heidar Ali (2010), A Practical Guide to Qualitative Research, Tehran, Organization for the Study and Compilation of Humanities in Universities (Secondary), Second Edition.[in Persian]


• Hossein Panah, Mehdi (2015). Different perspectives on the role of teachers in the teaching process of quality, the second national conference and the 9th conference on the assessment of the quality of academic systems, pp. 29-8.[in Persian]


• ‏Jahnukainen, M. (2011). Different strategies, different outcomes? The history and trends of the inclusive and special education in Alberta (Canada) and in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55(5), 489-502.[in Persian]


• Kenchaiah, S., & Krishna, P. (2017). Comparative study of case based learning with traditional teaching method in pharmacology for second year MBBS students. International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology, 5(4), 1210-1214.


• Keshavarzi, Mehdi, Yarmohammadian, Mohammad Hossein, Nadi, Mohammad Ali. (2017). The design of teaching methods based on the development of future studies in higher education in Iran. Journal of Research in New Approach in Educational Management, 8 (32), 157-174.[in Persian]


• Krsul, John (2012), Qualitative Scoping and Research Plan: Selection of Five Approaches (Narrative Research, Phenomenology, etc.). Translation by Hasan Danaee Fard and Hossein Kazemi, Tehran, Safar, Eshraghi, First edition.


• Mahjub Maddeb, Hajar and Asgari, Fariba (2010). Comparing the Effective Teaching Characteristics from the Viewpoints of Teachers and Students of Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Journal of Medical Education Development Studies Center, Volume 7, No. 1, pp. 26-33.[in Persian]


• Marifi, Y., Kayamanesh, A., Mehrmohammadi, M., and Ali Askari, M. (2007). Currency Curriculum Quality of Teaching in Higher Education: A Review of Some Viewpoints. Quarterly Studies of Curriculum .1 (5) .86-102.[in Persian]


• Mir Mohammadi Meybodi, Seyyed Jalil. (2012). Study of the Effective Teaching Features of Students' Viewpoints of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences in Yazd. Volume 5, Issue 9, 62-52.[in Persian]


• Mohaddesi, Hamideh, Feyz, Quiet and Healthy Safi, Reza. (2011), Comparative Study of Effective Teaching Indicators from the Viewpoint of Faculty Members and Students of Urmia University, Bimonthly Nursing Faculty of Urmia, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp. 471-464.[in Persian]


• Mohammadi, Mohammad (2015). Presentation of the model for effective teaching at Tabriz University. Thesis, Department of Educational Research, Faculty of Humanities, Islamic Azad University, Shabestar Branch, August 2007.[in Persian]


• Morghati Khoyi, Efesadat, Zarei, Fatemeh, Bayat, Alireza, Rimas, Shahnaz (2014). Explaining the Viewpoints of Teachers and Graduate Students about Learning and Learning Methods, Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion, Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages 82-67.[in Persian]


• Nick Roz, L., Rozitalab, M., Raygan Shirazi, A., Jahnzada, M. And Pity, (2012). Investigating the Obstacles to Implementing the Students 'Research Method from Students' Perspectives. Journal of Fasa University of Medical Sciences 2 (6). 3-319.[in Persian]


• Oluwatayo, J. A. (2013). Students rating of teaching behavior of Chemistry in public secondary schools in Ekiti State International Journal of Education and literary studies I(I):1-6.


• Otilia CLIPA, (2011). the profile of the academic assessor, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 12, pp.200–204.


• Raadabadi, Mehdi, Sadeghifar, Jamil, Bahadori, Mohammad Karim, Doroghi, Hossein (2012). Prioritizing Effective Factors on Teaching Effective from Students' Perspectives, Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 11th issue, pp. 825-817.[in Persian]


• Sarjala, J. (2013). Equality and cooperation: Finland’s path to excellence. American Educator, 37(1), 32-36.


• Shahamat, Fatemeh, Shahamat, Nader. (2016). Comparison of the use of educational technology in teaching methods of English language teaching in public and private universities of Shiraz. Journal of Research in New Approach in Educational Management, 7 (28), 267-286.[in Persian]


• Shirbigi nasser (2010). Strategies for measuring the effectiveness of teaching in higher education systems. new course. Year 3, Issue 10,9-10-9.[in Persian]


• Simerjit, s., Dinker, R. P., Nirmal, K., S., Avneet, K., Htoo Htoo K., S., & Ankur, B., (2013). Qualities of an effective teacher: What do medical teachers think? Singh et al. BMC Medical Education, 13(128), 2-7.


• Strauss, Anselm and Corbin, Juliet (2011), Principles of Qualitative Research Method: Basic Theory, Procedures and Methods, Translation by Biok Mohammadi, Tehran, Human Sciences Research and Cultural Studies Institute, Third Edition.


• Sutkin G, Wagner E, Harris I, et al. (2008), What makes a good clinical teacher in medicine? A review of the literature. Academic Medicine.83(5):452-66.


• Tucker, M. (2012). Teacher quality: What’s wrong with U.S. strategy? Educational Leadership, 69(4), 42-46.


• Yemen Yedozi Sorkhi, M., and Amin Mozafari, F. (2009). Investigating the Factors Affecting the Research Experiences of Graduate Students of Shahid Beheshti University, Educational and Psychological Studies of Ferdowsi University 1: 84-100.[in Persian]