Rise in Predatory Publishing: A Critical English for Academic Purposes Approach

Subject Areas : Education

Reza Rezvani ¹ (Department of Language, Yasouj University)
Saman Ebadi ² (Department of Language, Razi University)
Gerannaz Zamani ³ (Department of Language)

Received: 2018-05-09 Accepted : 2020-01-13 Published : 2020-02-20

Keywords: Predatory publishing, TEFL, CEAP, Symbolic violence,

Abstract :

There are demands on TEFL students and researchers from national authorities to publish widely. Because of the growing pressure put on students and their professors in the area of humanities especially TEFL to publish in national and international journals, it is often tempting for them to take the shortest possible root to get their articles published. Thus, the objective of this paper is to explore why publishing in predatory journals has been growing among students in higher education. In this article the researchers drew on critical English for academic purposes approach (CEAP) and Bourdieu’s (1991) concept of symbolic violence to demonstrate how violence and domination are reproduced in higher education which causes students to publish in predatory journals. In order to look into students’ views regarding predatory publishing a structured questionnaire was developed by the researchers and distributed among 52 PhD and MA students. The results of this study state that academic institutions and professors can exert symbolic violence that silence students’ voices. This study pervades critical pedagogy and right analysis into the learning system in order to democratize higher education institutions and to enact genuine and meaningful student engagement in the process of article publication.

References:

Armstrong, J. (2010). Political Economy of Academic Writing Practices. Journal of Thought, 45, 55-70.

Atta-ur-Rahman, & Nasim, A. (2004). Time for Enlightened Moderation: A Call for Islamic Nations to Renew and Reaffirm their Commitment to Science. Nature, 432, 273-274.

Beall, J. (2013). The Open-access movement is not really about open access. Triple C, 11(2):     589–597.

Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for Academic Purposes: Theory, Politics and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.

Berdie, D.R., & Anderson, J.F. (1974). Questionnaire Design and Use. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power (G. Raymond & M. Adamson, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Clark, A. M., & Thompson, D. R. (2012). Making good choices about publishing in the journal jungle [Editorial]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(11), 2373-2375.

Christopher, M.M., & Young, K.M. (2015). Awareness of "Predatory" Open-Access Journals among Prospective Veterinary and Medical Authors Attending Scientific Writing Workshops. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2(22). doi:10.3389/fvets.2015.00022

Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2004). Multilingual scholars and the imperative to publish in English: Negotiating interests, demands and rewards. TESOL Quarterly, 38,663-688.

Curry, M.J. & Lillis, T. (2014). Strategies and Tactics in Academic Knowledge Production by Multilingual Scholars. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 22(31), 1-28

Drugas, M. (2015). Predatory Publishing and the Psychology Behind it. Psychological Thought, 8(1), 1–6.

Erfanmanesh, M.A., & Pourhossain, R. (2017). Publishing in Predatory Open Access Journals: A Case of Iran. Research Quarterly, 33(4),433-444 

Frey, B.S. (2005). Problems with Publishing: Existing State and Solutions. European Journal of Law and Economics, 19, 173-190.

Gunaydin, G. P. & Dogan, N. O. (2015). A Growing Threat for academicians: Fake and Predatory Journals. The Journal of Academic Emergency Medicine, 14, 9-96.

Hasrati, M. (2013). Material and Credentialing Incentives as Symbolic Violence: Local Engagement and Global Participation Through Joint Publication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27, 154-179.

Hasrati, M., & Street, B. (2009). PhD topic arrangement in ‘‘D’’iscourse communities of engineers and social sciences/humanities. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 14-25.

Jalalian, M., & Mahboobi, H. (2013). New corruption detected: Bogus impact factors compiled by fake organizations. Electronic Physician, 5(3), 685-686.

Jalalian, M., & Mahboobi, H. (2014). Hijacked journals and predatory publishers: Is there a need to re-think how to assess the quality of academic research? Sci Tech, 11, 389-94.

Lee, H., & Lee, K. (2013). Publish (in international indexed journals) or perish: Neoliberal ideology in a Korean university. Language Policy, 12(3), 215-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10993- 012-9267-2

Lillis, T.M., & Curry, M. J. (2013). English, scientific publishing and participation in the global knowledge economy. In E. Erling & P. Sargeant (Eds.), English and international development (pp. 220-242). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Miller, A.N., & Taylor, S.G., & Bedeian, A.G. (2011). Publish or perish: Academic life as management faculty live it. Career Development International, 16(5), 422-445.

Mohammad Beigi A, Mohammad Salehi N, & Aligol M. (2015). Validity and Reliability of the Instruments and Types of Measurment in Health Applied Researches, J Rafsanjan University Med Sci; 13(10), 1153-70. [Farsi]

Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Cobey, K. D., Lalu, M. M., Galipeau, J., Avey, M. T., ... & Daniel, R. (2017). Stop this waste of people, animals and money. Nature, 549(7670), 23.

Pennycook, A. (1997). Vulgar pragmatism, critical pragmatism, and EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 253-69.

Renandya, W.A. (2014). What are Bogus Journals and Why Should We Avoid Them. Beyond Words, 2(2), 1-18

Shumba, A. (2010). Accredited Research Output by Academic Staff According to DoHET Benchmarks. Paper presented at a Research Orientation Seminar, School of Teacher Education, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein, South Africa, 18 March 2010.

Salager-Meyer, F. (2008). Scientific publishing in developing countries: Challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7, 121-132.

Walther, M. (2014). Repatriation to France and Germany: A comparative study based on Bourdieu's Theory of Practice.  Retrieved from http://books.google.com

Weiner, G. (2001). The academic journal: Has it a future? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(9). 1-19