Nesa Nabifar
1
(
Nesa Nabifar, Ph. D
Islamic Azad University, Tabriz branch
Nesanabifar12@yahoo.com
)
Vida Fathi Bonabi
2
(
Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
)
Saeideh Ahangari
3
(
Department of English Language and Literature, Azad University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
)
Keywords:
Abstract :
REFERENCES
Alharbi, S. H. (2021). A Comparative Genre-Based Analysis of Move-Step Structure of RAIs in
Two Different Publication Contexts. English Language Teaching. 14(3),
ISSN 1916-4742 E-ISSN 1916-4750, Published by Canadian Center of Science and
Education.
Alvi, U. F., Mehmood, M. A. & Rasool, Sh. (2017). Identification of Moves Structure in the
Discussion Section of Social Sciences Doctoral Research Thesis. Journal DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29145/llr, Issue DOI: https://doi.org/10.29145/llr/31, 3(1).
Amnuai, W. & Wannaruk, A. (2013). Investigating move structure of English Applied Linguistics research discussions published in international and Thai journals. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1-13.
Ariarad, Z. & Esfandiari, R. (2021). A Genre-Based Analysis of the Moves and Steps in the
Discussion Section of Psychology Research Articles between English Writers and Iranian
Writers. Journal of Language and Translation. 11(3), 109-130.
Basturkmen, H. (2009). Commenting on results in published research articles and masters’ dissertations in language teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(4), 241-251.
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in
Dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 134-144
Bian, Y. (2023). Language Features of Construction Contracts from the Lens of Genre
Analysis. Conference: International Conference of Research on Language Education.
DOI:10.15405/epes.23097.19
Bonsu, E. M. & Afful, J. B. A. (2022). Genre Analysis of Abstracts of Research Articles Published
In Biostatistics. International Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics, 5(1): 17-38
Dervin, F. (2016). Interculturality in education: A theoretical and methodological toolbox.
London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre Analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written text analysis (pp. 219-228). Routledge, London.
Evans, C. (2003). The relationship between the cognitive style(s) and preferred teacher style(s)
Of PGCE students. Unpublished Ed.D thesis, University of Durham.
Gries, S. T., & Deshors, S. C. (2015). EFL and/vs. ESL?: A multi-level regression modeling
perspective on bridging the paradigm gap. International Journal of Learner Corpus
Research, 1(1), 130-159.
Helm, S. & Guth, S. (2010). The multifarious goals of tele collaboration 2.0: Theoretical and
practical implications. In S. Guth & F. Helm (Eds.), Tele collaboration 2.0 for language and intercultural learning (pp. 69–106). Bern: Peter Lang.
Herman, Ch. & Sehoole, Ch. (2017). Research and PhD capacities in sub-Saharan Africa: South
Africa Report. British Council, DAAD.
Hidayat, Y. & Herniawati, A. (2023). The Realization of Genre Analysis on Students’ Essay: A
Classroom Discourse Perspective. Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics and Literature. 3(1).
Hoff, H. E. (2020). The Evolution of Intercultural Communicative Competence:
Conceptualizations, Critiques and Consequences for 21st Century Classroom Practice. Intercultural Communication Education, 3 (2), 55-74 (2020), https://doi.org/10.29140/ice.v3n2.264
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal
Of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133-151
Illman, R. & Nynäs, P. (2017). Kultur, människa, möte: ett humanistiskt perspektiv. Lund:
Studentlitteratur AB.
Jalilifar, A. R. (2009). Research articles in applied linguistics: A genre-based writing guide.
Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University.
Jalilifar, A. R., Hayati, A. M., & Namdari, N. (2012). A comparative study of research article
discussion sections of local and international applied linguistic journals. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 9(1), 1-29.
Johns, A. M. (2013). Rhetorical genre studies (RGS) and the teaching of EFL reading and writing–
or genre is much more than text structure. In X. Deng. & R. Seow (Eds.), Alternative
pedagogies in the English language & communication classroom (pp. 1-8). Singapore:
CELC.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in
research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 37(1), 74–86.
Kovacs, G. (2017). Culture in Language Teaching: A course design for teacher trainees. ACTA
UNIV. SAPIENTIAE, PHILOLOGICA, 9(3): 73–8. DOI: 10.1515/ausp-2017-0030
Liu, Y., & Buckingham, L. (2018). The schematic structure of discussion sections in applied linguistics and the distribution of meta-discourse markers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 34(July), 97-109.
Loan, N. T. T. & Pramoolsook, I. (2015). Move Analysis of Results-Discussion Chapters in
TESOL Master’s Theses Written by Vietnamese Students. 3L: The Southeast Asian
Journal of English Language Studies. 21(2), 1 – 15.
Massoum, Y. & Yazdanmehr, E. (2019). A Genre-analysis of the Discussion Section of Iranian
and English ELT Theses: A Comparative Study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies,
9(12), 1611-1623, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0912.19
McCarthy, P. & Wient, M. (2019). Who are the top PhD employers? Advancing Australia’s knowledge economy. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
McIntyre, D. (2015). Towards an integrated corpus stylistics. Topics in Linguistics 16(1), 59-68
Namvar, F. & Ibrahim, N. (2014). Construction of Collocations in the Writing of Postgraduate
Students. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 7(02), 487–497.
Namvar, F., Mohd Nor, N.F., Ibrahim, N. & Mustafa, J. (2017). Analysis of collocations in the
Iranian postgraduate students’ writings. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English
Language Studies. 18(1), 11 – 22.
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles.
Department of English and Communication, City University of Hong Kong, Elsevier Science Ltd.
Porto, M. (2013). A model for describing, analyzing and investigating cultural understanding in
EFL reading settings. The Language Learning Journal, 41(3), 284–296.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.836346.
Rahimpour, S. & Faghih, E. (2009). Contrastive rhetoric of English and Persian written texts:
Metadiscourse in applied linguistics research articles. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics. 1, February 2009.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied
linguistics. Routledge.
Risager, K. (2018). Representations of the world in language textbooks. Bristol: Channel View
Publications.
Ros i Solé, C. (2013). Cosmopolitan speakers and their cultural cartographies. The Language
Learning Journal, 41(3), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.836349.
Said Husin, M. & Nurbayani, E. (2017). The Ability of Indonesian EFL Learners in Writing
Academic Papers. Dinamika Ilmu, 17(2). Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/di.v17i2.725
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. & Khakbaz, N. (2011). Theses ‘Discussion’ sections: A structural
move analysis. International Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 5(3), 111-132.
Shirani, Sh. & Chalak, A. (2016). Genre Analysis of Iranian TEFL Students’ Master Theses.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(2), 31-37
Soodmand Afshar, H., Doosti, M. & Movassagh, H. (2018). A Genre Analysis of the Introduction
Section of Applied Linguistics and Chemistry Research Articles. Iranian Journal of
Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 21(1), 163-214.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Maele, J., & Messelink, A. (2019). Mobilizing essentialist frameworks in non-essentialist
intercultural training. In P. Romanowski & E. Bandura (Eds.), Intercultural foreign
language teaching and learning in higher education contexts, (pp. 141–161). Hershey, PA:
IGI Global.
Yang, R. & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-385.