Maize- Peanut Intercropping Under Inoculated with Azotobacter chroococcum
Subject Areas : Journal of Crop EcophysiologySiavash Pourjani 1 , Hashem Aminpanah 2 , mohammadnaghi safarzade vishekaei 3
1 - Ph.D. Student of Agronomy, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
2 - Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
3 - Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
Keywords: Land equivalent ratio, Legume-cereal intercropping, Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Sustainable agriculture, Yield,
Abstract :
Intercropping and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria improve sustainability of agro-ecosystems. To evaluate the effect of Azotobacter (Azotobacter chroococcum) inoculation on productivity of a peanut /maize intercropping system, a two-year study was design as a randomized complete block in a factorial arrangement with three replicates at Astaneh-ye Ashrafiyeh, Guilan province. Factors were Azotobacter inoculation [control (non-inoculated) and inoculated with Azotobacter chroococcum) and intercropping pattern (Sole cropping of peanut and maize, additive intercropping pattern at three levels (100% peanut + 100% maize, 100% peanut + 50% maize, and 50% peanut + 100% maize), and replacement intercropping pattern at three levels (50% peanut + 50% maize, 67% peanut +33% maize, and 33% peanut + 67% maize). Results showed that gain yields of maize and peanut were significantly affected by Azotobacter inoculation and intercropping pattern. Inoculation with Azotobacter chroococcum significantly increased grain yields of peanut and maize by 10% and 16%, respectively. Maximum and minimum of land equivalent ratio (LER) were observed at 100% peanut + 50% maize and 50% peanut + 50% maize, respectively and inoculated intercropped plots with Azotobacter chroococcum had 12-16% grater LER that non-inoculated ones. Regards to impossibility of mechanical weed control by machines in additive intercropping patterns, to obtain the highest productivity in maize/peanut intercropping system, intercropping pattern of 100% peanut + 50% maize along with Azotobacter application will be suitable in fields with low weed density. Otherwise, based on LER and grain yield of peanut, the intercropping pattern of 67% peanut + 33% maize along with Azotobacter application will be suitable.
Aasfar, A., A. Bargaz, K. Yaakoubi, A. Hilali, I. Bennis1, Y. Zeroua, and I.M. Kadmiri. 2021. Nitrogen fixing azotobacter species as potential soil biological enhancers for crop nutrition and yield stability. Frontiers in Microbiology. 12: 628379
Ahmad, I., Z. Cheng, H. Meng, T. Liu, W.C. Nan, , M.A. Khan, H. Wasila, and A.R. Khan. 2013. Effect of intercropped garlic (Allium sativum) on chlorophyll contents, photosynthesis and antioxidant enzymes in pepper. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 45: 1889–1896.
Ahmed, A., and S. Hasnain. 2014. Auxins as one of the factors of plant growth improvement by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Polish Journal of Microbiology. 63: 261–266.
Ainsworth, E.A., and S.P. Long. 2005. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytologist. 165: 351–372.
Al-Erwy, A. S., A. Al-Toukhy, and S.O. Bafeel. 2016. Effect of chemical, organic and bio fertilizers on photosynthetic pigments, carbohydrates and minerals of wheat (Triticum aestivum. L.) irrigated with sea water. International Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences. 3(2): 296-310.
Anonymous. 2004. SAS Institute, version 9.1.3. Cary, NC, USA.
Arnon, D. 1949. Copper enzymes isolated chloroplasts, polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology. 24: 1–15.
Bageshwar, U. K., M. Srivastava, P. Pardha-Saradhi, and S. Paul. 2017. An environmentally friendly engineered Azotobacter strain that replaces a substantial amount of urea fertilizer while sustaining the same wheat yield. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 83: e00590-17.
Bainard, L., A. Koch, A. Gordon, and J. Klironomos. 2013. Growth response of crops to soil microbial communities from conventional monocropping and tree-based intercropping systems. Plant and Soil. 363: 345–356.
Banik, A., G.K., Dash, P.Swain, and U. Kumar,. 2018. and pplication of rice (Oryza sativa L.) root endophytic diazotrophic Azotobacter sp. strain Avi2 (MCC 3432) can increase rice yield under green house and field condition. Microbiological Research. 219: 56-65.
Barrios-Masias, F.H., R.T. Chetelat, N.E. Grulke, and L.E. Jackson. 2014. Use of introgression lines to determine the ecophysiological basis for changes in water use efficiency and yield in California processing tomatoes. Functional Plant Biology. 41: 119-132.
Boudreau, M.A., 2013. Diseases in intercropping systems. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 51: 499–519.
Charani, E., P. Sharifi, and H. Aminpanah. 2017. Evaluation of grain yield and yield components in intercropping of maize and bean. Biharean Biologist. 11 (1): 37–42.
Dabaghian, Z., H. Pirdashti, A. Abasian, and S. H. Bahari Saravi. 2015. The effect of biofertilizers, Thiobacillus, Azotobacter, Azospirillum and organic sulfur on nodulation process and yield of soybean (Glycine Max L. Merr.) Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi). 107: 17-25. (In Persian).
Dahmardeh, M. and A. Keshtegar. 2014. Evaluation of yield and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.) in intercropping with peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Agroecology. 6: 311-323. (In Persian).
Dhima, K.V., A.A. Lithourgidis, I.B. Vasilakoglou, and C.A. Dordas. 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research. 100: 249–256
Dilworth. M.J., R.R. Eady, and M.E. Eldridge. 1988. The vanadium nitrogenase of Azotobacter chroococcum Reduction of acetylene and ethylene to ethane, Biochemical Journal. 249: 745–751
Dwivedi, S.K. and R. Gopal. 2013. Effect of plant Growth promoting rhizobacteria and P2O5 on soybean (Glycine max L.) crop. International Journal of Biological and Pharmaceutical Research. 4(12): 1270-1276.
El-Sawah, A.M.; F.I.A. Hauka, and H. Afify Aida. 2018. Dual inoculation with Azotobacter chroococcum MF135558 and Klebsiella oxytoca MF135559 enhance the growth and yield of wheat plant and reduce N-fertilizers usage. Journal of Food Dairy Science. 10: 67–76.
Enebe, M.C. and O.O. Babalola. 2018 The influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in plant tolerance to abiotic stress: A survival strategy. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 102:7821–7835.
Franco, J.G., S.R. King, and A. Volder. 2018. Component crop physiology and water use efficiency in response to intercropping. European Journal of Agronomy. 93: 27-39.
Gao, C., A.M. El-Sawah, D.F.I. Ali, Y.A. Hamoud, H. Shaghaleh, and M.S. Sheteiwy. 2020. The integration of bio and organic fertilizers improve plant growth, grain yield, quality and metabolism of hybrid maize (Zea mays L.). Agronomy. 10: 319.
Hafez, M., Elbarbary, T. A., Ibrahim, I., and Abdel-Fatah, Y. 2016. Azotobacter vinelandii evaluation and optimization of Abu Tartur Egyptian phosphate ore dissolution. Saudi Journal of Pathology and Microbiology. 1: 80–93.
Hajeeboland, R., N. Aliasgharzadeh, and Z. Mehrfar. 2004. Ecological study of azotobacter in two pasture lands of the north-west Iran and its inoculation effect on growth and mineral nutrition of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Omid) plants. Journal of Water and soil Science. 8(2): 75–90. (In Persian).
Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., M. Gooding, P. Ambus, G. Corre-Hellou, , Y. Crozat, , C. Dahlmann, A. Dibet, P. Fragstein, A. Pristeri, M. Monti, and E.S. Jensen. 2009. Pea–barley intercropping and short-term subsequent crop effects across European organic cropping conditions. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 85: 141–155.
Inal, A, A. Gunes, F. Zhang, and I. Cakmak. 2007. Peanut/maize intercropping induced changes in rhizosphere and nutrient concentrations in shoots. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 45: 350–356.
Javanmard, A., M. Amani Machiani, and H. Eskandari. 2019. Evaluation of forage quantity and quality of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and pea (Pisum sativum L.) intercropping system in Maragheh rainfed conditions. Journal of Agroecology. 11(2): 435–452. (In Persian).
Keshtegar, A., M. Dahmardeh, M. Galavi, and I. Khammari, 2016. Study of the pattern of intercropping and monoculture of maize (Zea mays L.) and peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) on weed properties. Iranian Journal of Filed Crop Science. 46 (4): 547–558. (In Persian).
Keshtegar, A., M. Dahmardeh, M. Galavi, and I. Khammari. 2015. Evaluation of yield and yield components of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) in intercropping with maize (Zea mays L.). Agronomy Journal (Pajouhesh & Sazandegi). 107: 115-123. (In Persian).
Khavarii, H., and Gh. Shakarami. 2019. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal and azotobacter chroococcum on growthand yield of red bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Echophysiology Journal. 38:118-131. (In Persian).
Khorshidi, M., B. Bicharanlou, and M. Bagheri. 2014. Elevated the tolerance of maize plants to temperature changes through symbiosis with three species of mycorrhiza. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 23: 187–200. (In Persian)
Kourtev, P., J. Ehrenfeld, and M. Häggblom. 2003. Experimental analysis of the effect of exotic and native plant species on the structure and function of soil microbial communities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 35: 895–905.
Latef, A.A.H.A., M.F.A., Alhmad, M. Kordrostami, A.B.A.E. Abo-Baker, and A. Zakir. 2020. Inoculation with Azospirillum lipoferum or Azotobacter chroococcum reinforces maize growth by improving physiological activities under saline conditions. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 39: 1293–1306.
Leylasi Marand, M., and M. Sarikhani. 2018. Investigation of nitrogen fixation efficiency of some azotobacter isolates by maize inoculation. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 51–63. (In Persian).
Li, L., D. Tilman, H. Lambers, and F.S. Zhang. 2014. Plant diversity and over yielding: Insights from belowground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture. New Phytologist. 203: 63–69.
Mathivanan, S., A.A. Chidambaram, G.A. Robert, and R. Kalaikandhan. 2017. Impact of PGPR inoculation on photosynthetic pigment and protein contents in Arachis hypogaea L. Journal of Scientific Agriculture. 1:29–36.
Nakhzari Moghadam, A., M. Chaeichi, D. Mazaheri, H. Rahimian Mashhadi, N. Majnoon Hosseini, and A. Noorinia. 2010. Effect of intercropping of maize with mung bean on yield and land equivalent ratio and some characteristics of forage quality. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research. 40(4): 151–159. (In Persian).
Raei, Y., M. Sayyadi Ahmadabad, K. Ghassemi-Golezani, and S. Ghassemi. 2020. The effect of biological and chemical nitrogen fertilizers on pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and black mustard (Brasassica nigra L.) intercropping. Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 30(3):21–40. (In Persian).
Saha, B., S. Saha, A. Das, P. Bhattacharyya, N. Basak, and A. Sinha. 2017. Biological nitrogen fixation for sustainable agriculture. In: Agriculturally Important Microbes for Sustainable Agriculture. Meena, V.S., P.K. Mishra, J.K. Bisht, and A. Pattanayak (eds.). pp: 81–128. Springer, Singapore.
Sairam, R.K., P.S. Deshmukh, and D.C. Saxena. 1998. Role of antioxidant systems in wheat, genotype tolerance to water stress. Biologia Plantarum. 41(3): 387–394.
Shirzad Chenari, A., H. Aminpanah, and P. Sharifi. 2017. Application of herbicide in paddy fields inoculated with azotobacter chroococcum. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 11: 211–228. (In Persian).
Viscardi, S., V. Ventorino, P. Duran, A. Maggio, S. De Pascale, M.L. Mora, and O. Pepe. 2016. Assessment of plant growth promoting activities and abiotic stress tolerance of Azotobacter chroococcum strains for a potential use in sustainable agriculture. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 16(3): 848–863.
Wani, S.A., S. Chand, M.A. Wani, M. Ramzan, and K.R. Hakeem. 2016. Azotobacter chroococcum – a potential biofertilizer in agriculture: An overview. In: Soil Science: Agricultural and Environmental Prospectives. Hakeem, K.R., J. Akhtar, and Sabir, M. (eds.). pp: 333–348. Cham: Springer.
Xiong, H., Y. Kakei, T. Kobayashi, X. Guo, M. Nakazono, H. Takahashi, H. Nakanishi, H. Shen, F. Zhang, N.K. Nishizawa, and Y. Zuo. 2013. Molecular evidence for phytosiderophore- induced improvement of iron nutrition of peanut intercropped with maize in calcareous soil. Plant, Cell and Environment. 36: 1888–1902.
Zhang, F., and L. Li. 2003. Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances crop productivity and nutrient-use efficiency. Plant and Soil. 48: 305–312.
Zuo, Y.M., Y.X. Liu, F.S. Zhang, and C. Peter. 2004. Studies on the improvement iron nutrition of peanut intercropping with maize on nitrogen fixation at early stages of growth of peanut on a calcareous soil. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition. 50:1071–1078.
