The nature of revisionism of Russia and China towards the United States of America
Subject Areas :
danyal rezapoor
1
,
Rohullah Monem
2
1 - assistance professor
2 - Guilan University
Keywords: Russia, China, America, revisionism, great powers,
Abstract :
The world order based on liberal rules has been transforming for more than a decade and new international orders are emerging. In this context, Moscow is focused on controlling regional relations in Eurasia with regard to the resources inside and outside the system, and China is also trying to influence the world with the Belt-Road initiative from the point of view of economic power, but currently the geopolitical realities of each It has led both parties to a revisionist strategy. Based on this, the current research is dedicated to describing the main features and concepts of a revisionist world and the four orders existing in it, and especially the views of Moscow and Beijing towards the world order. Therefore, the present article aim hat have occurred in international politics, the revisionist policy of Russia and China towards the world hegemon is based on what characteristics? The answer that can be given to the above question is that the revisionist policy of Russia and China towards the global hegemon is based on two contrasting features: Russia by choosing the military option at the regional level to recover the lost territories, balancing the influence of America and In the post-Soviet space, Europe has taken the form of revisionist nationalism and is improving its international position, but China is a reformist revisionist who tries to use economic and diplomatic tools based on a global strategy. to increase its power on a global scale, which will be explained using the descriptive-analytical method
1) تین نیوز( 1399)، جاده ابریشم جدید و سهم ایران در پروژه چینی. https://www.tinn.ir.
2) خبرآنلاین( 1402)، چرا ایران از قافله توسعه عقب ماند؟ https://www.khabaronline.ir/news/1758386
3) رضایی، رامتین و محمدعلیپور، فریده( 1398)، نظریه روح بنیان ریچارد ندلیبو: چارچوبی تحلیلی برای تبیین تجدیدنظرطلبی در روابط بین¬الملل. دو فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی پژوهش سیاست نظری، شماره بیست و ششم، پاییز و زمستان، صص. 163-194.
4) صفری، عسگر و رادگودرزی، معصومه( 1400)، همکاری¬های چین و روسیه؛ تحلیلی از منظر تئوری انتقال قدرت. فصلنامه روابط خارجی، سال 13، شماره 2، تابستان، صص. 269-308.
5) صفری، فرزانه و احمدی، حمید و برزگر، کیهان( 1400)، بررسی رویکرد چین و روسیه به نظم منطقه¬ای در اوراسیا. فصلنامه مطالعات بین¬المللی، سال 18، شماره 1، تابستان، صص. 82- 108.
6) نوری، علیرضا( 1400)، ماهیت تجدیدنظرطلبی روسیه و چین؛ سیاست و منافع ایران. مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی، دوره 14، شماره 2، پاییز و زمستان، صص. 371-396.
7) یزدانی، عنایت الله و همکاران( 1396)، نقش روسیه و چین در گذار نظام بین¬الملل ازتک قطبی به چند قطبی. فصلنامه مطالعات سیاسی، سال نهم، شماره 36، تابستان، صص. 65-90.
8) Bukkvol, Tor. (2016). Russian Military Power. Russian Special Operations Forces in Crimea and Donbas. Parameters 46 (2).
9) Buzan, Barry. (2008). People, States & Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in PostCold War Era. Essex: ECPR Press.
10) Buzan, Barry. (2010). China in International Society: Is ’Peaceful Rise’ Possible? The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3 (1).
11) Cohen, Ariel, and Hamilton, Robert E. (2011). The Russian Military and the Georgia War: Lessons and Implications. Strategic Studies Institute. ssi.armywarcollege.edu/pdffiles/pub1069.pdf.
12) European Parliament. (2022). Accessed 27 July 2022. https://www.europarl.europa.eu>etudes>BRIE.
13) Goddard, Stacie E. )2018(. Embedded Revisionism: Networks, Institutions, and Challenges to World Order. International Organization 72.
14) He, Kai, Feng, Huiyun, Chan, Steven, and Hu, Weixing. (2021). Rethinking Revisionism in World Politics. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 14 (2).
15) Kofman, Michael. (2015). Russia’s Arsenal in Syria: What Do We Know? War and the Rocks. http:// warontherocks.com/2015/10/russia-arsenal-in-syria-what-do-we-know.
16) Mearsheimer, John J (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
17) Mearsheimer, John J. (2006). Structural Realism. In Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki and Steve Smith, eds. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18) National Development and Reform Commission. (2023). Accessed 23 February 2023. https://en. ndrc.gov.cn.
19) Okuda, Hiroko. (2016). China’s ‘Peaceful Rise/Peaceful Development’: A Case Study of Media Frame of the Rise of China. Global Media and China 1 (1-2).
20) Pisciotta, Barbara (2023), Regional and Global Revisionism: Russia and China in a Comparative Perspective. THE INTERNATIONAL SPECTATOR 2023, VOL. 58, NO. 3, 96–112 https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2023.2194161.
21) Pisciotta, Barbara. (2020). Russian Revisionism in the Putin Era: An Overview of Post-Communist Military Interventions in Georgia, Ukraine, and Syria. Italian Political Science Review 50 (1).
22) Rynning, Sten, and Ringsmose. Jens. (2008). Why Are Revisionist States Revisionist? Reviving Classical Realism as an Approach to Understanding International Change. International Politics 45 (1).
23) Schweller, Randall L. (2015). Rising Powers and Revisionism in Emerging International Orders. Valdai Papers 16, Valdai Discussion Club, May.
24) Strange, Susan. (1987). The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony. International Organization 41 (4).
25) The Spectator. (2022). Accessed 25 July 2022. http://www.spectator.co.uk.
26) Turner, Oliver, and Nymalm, Nicola. (2019). Morality and Progress: IR Narratives on International Revisionism and the Status Quo. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (4).
27) Ward, Steven. (2017). Status and the Challenge of Rising Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
