Identifying the Components of Improving Research and Development Capabilities with a Qualitative Approach in Industries with Complex Technology

Subject Areas : Strategic Management Researches

amirhosain farhadi ¹ ( PhD student in Technology Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran )
Aboalghasem sarabadani ² ( Assistant Professor in Information Technology Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran )
seyd sepehr ghazi noori ³ ( Professor in Information Technology Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran )

Received: 2022-10-18 Accepted : 2023-02-11 Published : 2023-02-20

Keywords: qualitative approach, Empowerment Research and Development, Complex Technology,

Abstract :

Complex technologies require the existence of research and development units with high capabilities. This need is very vital in industries that do not have the possibility to transfer technology under the prevailing conditions. The purpose of this research is to identify effective and key components in improving the level of research and development capability in one of the strategic industries with complex technology. This research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of qualitative research method, which was carried out with the foundation's data theory strategy. The statistical population is the experts of design and research and development units of the nuclear industry. In order to analyze and identify components and dimensions, the exploratory analysis and "Atlas.ti" software have been used. Based on the results analysis, 332 open codes, 28 sub-categories and 6 main categories were identified and extracted. According to the findings of the research, dynamic organization has the highest emphasis from the interviewees and, in order, reliable management, leading technology governance, knowledge-based mediating institutions, organizational social capital, and local product commercialization are among the other components identified in order to improve research capability and development in studied industry. Better understanding and recognition of the enabling components and criteria of research and development and knowing the importance of each of them in relation to each other, while developing theoretical concepts in this field, creates this possibility for research and development managers and influencers in decision making to make more favorable decisions regarding the proper allocation of resources and increase the possibility of success in obtaining technology.

References:

اصغری، مریم؛ خمسه، عباس؛ پیله‌وری، نازنین (1399). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی مؤلفه ­های ارتقای بهره­ وری توانایی‌های تحقیق و توسعه در صنایع نیروگاهی و تأمین انرژی، نشریه مدیریت بهره‌وری، سال چهاردهم، شماره 55: ۹۴-۱۱۸.

 اثنی عشری، امین؛ قیدر خلجانی، جعفر؛ کریمی گوارشکی، محمدحسین (1399). سه‌گانه قابلیت، عدم قطعیت و پیچیدگی در پروژه­ های توسعه محصولات و سامانه­ های پیچیده، مدیریت نوآوری، سال نهم، شماره 1: 59-99.

باقری، ابوالفضل (1390). مدل انتقال دانش و تکنولوژی‌های پیشرفته میان دانشگاه و صنعت در ایران، رساله دکتری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.

جمالی پاقلعه، مرتضی (1391). رویکرد تحلیلی مقایسه‌ای به تحقیق و توسعه در ایران و چند کشور پیشرفته، فصلنامه تخصصی پارک‌ها و مراکز رشد، سال هشتم، شماره 31.

 خلیل، طارق؛ ترجمه اعرابی؛ سید محمد؛ ایزدی، داوود (1395). مدیریت تکنولوژی؛ رمز موفقیت در رقابت و خلق ثروت، تهران: انتشارات دفتر پژوهش‌های فرهنگی.

خمسه، عباس؛ عصاری، محمدحسین (1398). مدیریت تحقیق و توسعه، تهران: انتشارات سرافراز

رضائیان، علی (1393). انتظار عدالت و عدالت در سازمان (مدیریت رفتار سازمانی پیشرفته)، تهران: سمت.

سرآبادانی، ابوالقاسم؛ طباطباییان، سید حبیب‌الله؛ میرمعزی، سید حسین؛ امیری، مقصود (1395). ارتقای کیفیت سیاست‌گذاری در علم و فناوری با رویکرد اسلامی ایرانی، پژوهش‌های نوین در تصمیم‌ گیری، دوره 1، شماره 1.

شاه‌آبادی، ابوالفضل؛ سلیمی، صبا (1394). تأثیر حکمرانی خوب بر شدت تحقیق و توسعه کشورهای منتخب توسعه‌یافته و درحال‌توسعه، فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی سیاست علم و فناوری، سال هفتم، شماره 2.

صفدری رنجبر، مصطفی؛ قیدرخلجانی، جعفر؛ طهماسبی، سیامک؛ توکلی، غلامرضا (1395). قابلیت‌های کلیدی برای نوآوری و توسعه محصولات و سامانه‌های پیچیده دفاعی، مدیریت توسعه فناوری: 133-158

میر فخرالدینی، سید حیدر؛ شاکری، فاطمه؛ شاکری، منصور (1391). تعیین کارآیی مراکز و واحدهای پژوهشی تیم محور با رویکرد مدیریت دانش و استفاده از مدل CAF و DEA، فصلنامه چشم‌انداز مدیریت دولتی، سال سوم شماره 9: 139 – 161.

 Alassaf, D. & Dabić, M. & Shifrer, D. & Daim, T. (2020). The impact of open-border organization culture and employees’ knowledge, attitudes, and rewards with regards to open innovation: an empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(9), 2273-2297.

Bamfield, P. (2006).The Innovation Chain, in Research and Development in the Chemical and Pharmaceutical Industry. Third, Completely Revised and Enlarged Edition, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.KGaA,Weinheim, 3rd, p.125.

Bassanini, A. & Ernst, E. (2002). Labour market regulation, industrial relations and technological regimes: a tale of comparative advantage. Industrial and Corporate Change 11(3) 391-426.

Becker, M. C. & F. Zirpoli. (2017). “How to avoid innovation competence loss in.

Canetti, D. & Waismel-Manor, I. & Cohen, N. & Rapaport, C. (2014). What Does National Resilience Mean in a Democracy? Evidence from the United States and.Israel. Armed Forces & Society. Vol 40. No 3. pp 504-520.

Chumaidiyah E. (2012). The Technology, Technical Skill, and R&D Capability in Increasing Profitability on Indonesia Telecommunication Services Companies, Procedia Economics and Finance, 4, 110–119.

Creswell, John W. & Dana, L. (2000). "Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry.

Cetindamar, D. & Phaal, R. & Probert, D. (2009). Understanding technology management as adynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities. Technovation, v.35, pp.237-246.

Chandrasekaran, A. & Linderman, K. & Sting, F. J. & Benner, M. J. (2016). Managing R&D project shifts in high‐tech organizations: A multi‐method study. Production and Operations Management, 25, 390-416.

Development (OECD) countries? Applied Economics 38(5): 533-547.

Falk, M. (2006). What drives business Research and Development (R&D) intensity across Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries? Applied Economics 38(5): 533-547.

Guellec, D. & Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, B. (2004). From R&D to productivity growth: Do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter? Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics, 66, 353-378.

Ihuah, P. W. & Kakulu, I. I. & Eaton, D. (2014). A review of Critical Project Management Success Factors (CPMSF) for sustainable social housing in Nigeria. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment,3(1),62-71.

Kang,T. & Baek, C. & Lee, J. D. (2018). R&D activities for becoming a high-growth firm through large jumps: evidence from Korean manufacturing, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 26(3), 1-24.

Khamseh, A. & Rajabi, M. (2017). “Identifying and prioritizing strategic factors affecting outsourcing of R&D projects in the defense industry with a future research approach”, defense futures journal, 4, 63-86.

Karaveg, C. & Thawesaengskulthai, N. & Chandrachai, A. (2016). R&D commercialization capability criteria: implications for project selection. Journal of Management Development, 35(3), 304-325.

Kanwar, S. & Evenson, R. (2003). Does intellectual property protection spur technological change? Oxford Economic Papers 55(2): 235-264.

Kok Chian, T. & Aik, L. & Chong, A. & Seow, V. Y. & Joel Kah Marn, T. (2019). Critical Success Factors for Malaysian SMEs and Large Companies in Commercializing Universities’ R&D Outputs. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy.

Lee, J. J. & Yoon, H. (2015). A comparative study of technological learning and organizational capability development in complex products systems: Distinctive paths of three latecomers in military aircraft industry. Research policy, 44(7), pp. 1296-1313.

Lin, R. J. & Tan, K. H. & Geng, Y. (2013). Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. J. Clean. Prod, 40, 101-107.London and New York, Routledge.

Naghizadeh, M. M. & Manteghi, M. & Naghizadeh, R. (2016). “Managing integration in complex product systems: The experience of the IR-150 aircraft design program.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Nerkar, A. & Paruchuri, S. (2005)." Evolution of R&D Capabilities: The Role of Knowledge Networks Within a Firm", Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences, 51(5), 679-849.

Omand, D. (2005). “Developing national resilience”. Developing national resil.ience. Vol 150. No 4. pp 14-18.

Stennett, A. (2011)." EU Innovation Policy–Best Practice",Research and Information Service Research Paper.

Thi, C.H. & Swierczek, F.W. (2010). "Critical success factors in project management: implication from Vietnam", Asia Pacific Business Review 16(4), 567-589.

Ueki, H. (2016)." Knowledge Transfer and the Sharing of R&D Capabilities at the Japanese Automotive Firms in Asia", IFEAMA SPSCP, 4, 1-13.

UNESCO; Guide for Collecting Statistics Relating to Science and Technology Activities, 1982.

Nagesh, D. S. & Thomas, S. (2015)."Success factors of public funded R&D projects",Current Science, 108(3), 357-363.

Yin, S. H. & Wang, C. C. & Teng, L. Y. & Hsing, Y. M. (2012). Application of DEMATEL, ISM, and ANP for key success factor (KSF) complexity.

Zhenbing, Y. & Shuai, S. & Chengyu, L. & Lili, Y. (2019). Alleviating the misallocation of R&D inputs in China's manufacturing sector:From the perspectives of factor-biased technological innovation and substitution elasticity. Technological Forecasting & Social Change.