Evaluation of Different Levels of Soil Moisture and Seed Hydroperimination on Yield and Yield Components of Vigna radiate L. in Mashhad Climate
Subject Areas : Journal of Plant EcophysiologySeyedMasoud Ziaeie 1 , Ahmad Nezami 2 , hamidreza khazaie 3
1 - Higher educational complex of saravan
2 - Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
3 - null
Keywords: Electrolyte leakage, Yield and yield component, drought,
Abstract :
Soil water scarcity is one of the factors that has a significant effect on the performance and physiological function of mung beans. In drought stress conditions, seed priming can be a simple and inexpensive way to reduce the effects of stress. Therefore, in order to study the soil moisture content on yield and yield components, field cultivars were cultivated in Agricultural Research Station of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad in 2016. The experiment was conducted as split plot factorial in randomized complete block design with three replications. The main irrigation factor was three levels of 80, 60 and 40% of crop capacity and sub factor including line A73-726 and Uzbek variety (hydroperimed and non-priming). The results showed that A73-726 line had the highest and lowest grain yield and harvest index in all levels of applied moisture regime. Seed hydroperimed treatment showed an increase of about eight percent of the seed yield compared to non-priming conditions.
آذرنیا، م. و ح، عیسوند. 1394. بررسی اثر هیدروپرایمینگ و پرایمینگ هورمونی بر عملکرد و اجزا عملکرد نخود در شرایط دیم و آبی، نشریه تولید گیاهان زراعی، جلد 6، شماره 4: 1-18.
آریان نیا،ن. م،عنایت قلی زاده. م، شرفی زاده.1389 . بررسی اثرتاریخ کاشت وژنوتیپ برعملکرد و اجزای عملکرد ماش در شرایط محیطی دزفول. فصلنامه فیزیولوژی گیاهان زراعی،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اهواز. جلد 2، شماره 1 : 1-17.
رضائیان زاده، ا .1387. تاثیر آبیاری تکمیلی بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد و شاخص های رشد سه رقم نخود (Cicerarietinum L.). پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد. دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد.
زند پارسا، ش. م، محمودیان شوشتری. ا، مجنونی هریس. 1394. اندازه گیری تبخیر-تعرق استاندارد ذرت با روش بیلان آب و عمق متغیر ریشه در یک منطقه خشک و نیمه خشک. نشریه دانش آب و خاک. جلد 25، شماره 1: 180-169.
زارع زارگز، ج. و م، گلوی.1392، بررسی ویژگیهای فنولوژیک سه رقم ماش در واکنش به کم آبیاری در منطقه سیستان، نشریه پژوهشهای حبوبات ایران، جلد 4، شماره 2: 51-64.
ضابط،م.،ع.حسینزاده، ع. احمدی و ف. خیالپرست.1383 . تعیین مهمترین صفات مؤثر بر عملکرد تحت دو شرایط آبیاری با استفاده ازروشهای آماری چند متغیره در ژنوتیپهای ماش. مجله علوم کشاورزی ایران. جلد 35، شماره 4 : 839- 849..
مرادی،ع.، ع. احمدی و ع. حسینزاده. 1387 . واکنشهای زراعی- فیزیولوژیک ماش رقم پرتو به تنشهای شدید وخفیف خشکی در مراحل رشد رویشی و زایشی. مجله علوم وفنون کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی. جلد 12، شماره 45 : 659-671.
یوسفی، ب.،ح. کاظمی اریط، ف. رحیم زاده خویی و م. مقدم.1376. تجزیه ی علیت و بررسی ژنتیکی ارقام نخود زراعی تحت دو سطح رطوبت. مجله علوم کشاورزی ایران. جلد 28، شماره 4 :147-161.
Akbar, N., M.A.Iqbal and H.ZamanKhan. 2011. Agro-qualitative response of two cultivars of chickpea to different sowing techniques under irrigated conditions of Faisalabad. Crop Environ. 2(1): 19-23.
Amjad-Ali M., N. NobelNawab, A. Abbas, M. Zulkiffal and M, Sajjad. 2010. Evaluation of selection criteria in chickpea (Cicerarietinum) using correlation coefficients and path analysis. Aust J Crop Sci. 3(2):65-70.
Aslam, M., M, Hussain, M, Ather Nadeem., and A.M. Haqqani. 2004. Comparative efficiency of different mung bean genotypes under agro-climatic conditions of Bhakhar.Pak J Life Social Sci. 2(1): 51-53.
Bayat, A.A., A. Sephri, G. Ahmad and H.R. Dorri. 2010. Effect of Water deficit stress on yield and yield component of pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Iranian J Crop Sci. 12: 1. 42-54.
Bourgault, M., C. A.Madramootoo, H. A.Webber, G. Stulina, M. G. Horst and D. L. Smith. 2010. Effects of deficit irrigation and salinity stress on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and mungbean (Vignaradiata (L.) Wilczek) grown in a controlled environment. J Agron Crop Sci. 196: 262–272.
Duman, I. 2006. Effect of seed priming with PEG and K3PO4 on germination and seedling growth in Lettuce. Pak J Biol Sci. 9(5): 923-928.
Farooq, M., S. M. Basra and A. N. Ahmad. 2007. Imporoving the performance of transplanted rice by seed priming. plant growth regul .51:129-137
Gardner, P., R. Brent Pearce and R. L.Mitchell. 1999. Physiology of crop plants. Jahad Mashhad University Press.
Ghassemi-Golezani, K., S. FarhanghiAbriz, S. Hassannejad and S. Hassanpour-Bourkheili. 2014. Some physiological responses of mung-bean at different plant densities to water deficit. Int J Bios. 4(12): 19-26.
Gunes, A., A. Inal, M. S. Adak, E. G. Bagci, N.Cicek and F.Eraslan.2008 . Effect of drought stress implemented at pre-or post-anthesis stage on some physiological parameters as screening criteria in chickpea cultivars. Russ J Plant Physl. 55 (1): 59-67.
Harris, D. 2006. Development and testing of on-farm seed priming. Adv Agron. 90:129-178.
Harris, D., B.S. Raghuwanshi, J. S. Gangwar, S.C.Singh and P.A.Hollington. 1999. Participatory evaluation by farmers of on-farm seed priming in wheat in India, Nepal and Pakistan. Exp Agron. 37(3):403–415.
Kocheva, K. and G.Gorgiev.2003 . Evaluation of the reaction of two contrasting barley (Hordeumvulgare L.) cultivars in response to osmotic stress with PEG 6000 .Bulg J Plant Physl. Special Issue: 290-294.
Korte, L.L., J.H. Williams, T. E. Specht and R.C. Sorensen. 1993.Irrigation of soybean genotypes during reproductive ontogeny. J Agron respon and Crop Sci. 28:521-530.
Lalinia, A., N. Majnon Hoseini Galostian, M.Esmaeilzadeh Bahabadi and S.M. Marefatzadeh Khameneh. 2012. Echophysiological impact of water stress on growth and development of Mungbean. Int J Agron Plant Prod. 3(12):599
Musa, A.M., J. Johansen and J.Kumar. 2001. Short duration chickpea to replace fallow after Aman Rice: the role of on-farm seed priming in the high Briand Tract of Bangladesh. Exp Agr. 37: 509-521.
Neshimator, J., S.Singh, A. Bohra and A.Vyas. 2007. Agronomic evaluation of promisinggenotypes of mungbean under hyper arid conditions of Indian desert. J Agr Res. 2(6): 537-544.
Soltani, A., F.R.Khooie, K. Ghassemi-Golezani and M. Moghaddam. 2000. Thresholds for chickpea leaf expansion and transpiration response to soil water deficit. Field Crops Res. 68: 205-210.
Soltani, A., F.R. Khooie, K. Ghassemi-Golezani and M. Moghaddam. 2001. A simulation study ofchickpea crop response to limit irrigation in semiarid environment. Agric Water Manag. 49:225-237.
Thomas, M.J., S. Robertson and M.B. Fukai. 2003. The effect of timing and severity ofwater deficit on growth development, yield accumulation and nitrogen fixation of mungbean. Crop Res. 86 (1): 67-80.
Varier, A. and A. K. Vari Dadlani. 2010. The subcellular basis of seed priming. Current Sci. 99: 450-456.
Wakrim, R.S., H. Wahbi, B.Tahi and R.Aganchich. 2005. Comparative effects of partial root drying and regulated deficit errigation (RDI) on water relations and water use efficiency in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agr Ecosys Environ. 106: 275-287.
Zhu, J.K. 2002. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 53: 247-316.
_||_