Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Washington University Sentences Completion Test (WUSCT)
Subject Areas : روان‌شناسی تحولیAshraf Sadat Mousavi 1 , Parviz Azad Fallah 2 , Mohsen Dehghani, 3 , Hojatolah Farahani 4
1 - PhD in Psychology
2 - Tarbiat Modares University
3 - Shahid Beheshti University
4 - Islamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran
Keywords: Reliability, validity, ego development, Keywords: Washington University Sentences Completion Test,
Abstract :
This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties (validity, reliability and factorial structure) of the Persian version of the Washington University Sentences Completion Test (WUSCT; Hy & Loevinger 1996) for evaluating ego development. Two hundred and eighty nine undergraduate students (143 females, 146 males) were selected from different disciplines of Tehran University using convenience sampling. The guilt subscale of the Personal Feeling Questionnaire (Harder & Zalma, 1990) and the Chronic Self-Destructiveness Scale (Kelley, et al., 1985) were used for studying divergent validity. The results indicated that the WUSCT had appropriate internal consistency (ranged from 0/118 to 0/326). The Cronbach α and 2-weeks test-retest reliability were .781 and .876, respectively. The negative correlation of the WUSCT with self-destructiveness demonstrated the divergent validity of the WUSCT. The WUSCT could discriminate the group with high ego development from the group with low guilt and self-destructiveness which indicated the discriminant validity of the WUSCT. The factorial analyses indicated that the WUSCT was unidimensional. The findings suggest that the Persian version of the WUSCT is a valid and reliable tool for assessing ego development.
ارسلان‌ده، م. (1392). تحولیافتگی ایگو و مکانیزم‌های دفاعی در افراد زودانگیخته. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی، دانشکدة علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
بشارت، م. ع.، اسدی، م. م. و تولائیان، ف. (1394). نقش واسطه‌ای استحکام من در رابطة بین سبک‌های دلبستگی و راهبردهای نظم‌دهی شناختی هیجان. روان‌شناسی تحولی: روان‌شناسان ایرانی، 12 (46)، 119-107.
تقی‌یاره، ف. (1382). بررسی ارتباط سطح تحولیافتگی من، دلبستگی به خدا و جهت‌گیری مذهبی در دانشجویان. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی عمومی، دانشکدة علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی.
موسوی، ا. س.، آزادفلاح، پ.، فراهانی، ح. ا. و دهقانی، م. (1394). روایی، اعتبار و ساختار عاملی مقیاس خودتخریب‌گری مزمن. روان‌پزشکی و روان‌شناسی بالینی ایران، 21 (2)، 126-123.
موسوی، ا. س. (1384). بررسی احساس گناه، تمایلات خودانتقادی و خودشناسی در بیماران اتوایمیون، غیراتوایمیون و افراد سالم. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی عمومی، دانشکدة روان‌شناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران.
موسوی، ا. س.، قربانی، ن. و قاضیطباطبایی، م. (1393). مقایسة خودتخریب‌گری روان‌شناختی بر پایة خودشناسی، خودانتقادی و شرم و گناه در سه گروه افراد سالم، بیماران اتوایمیون و غیراتوایمیون. مجلة علوم رفتاری، 8 (1)،9-1.
هادی‌نژاد، ح. (1386). تحولیافتگی من و اختلال‌های شخصیت: مقایسة دو گروه زندانی و غیرزندانی. فصلنامه روان‌شناسی تحولی: روان‌شناسان ایرانی، 4 (14)، 187-177.
Bursik, K., & Martin, T. A. (2006). Ego development and adolescent academic achievement. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(1), 1-18.
Ezinga, M. A. (2008). Psychosocial development and the developmentof problem behaviour during adolescence. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University.
Gow, M. K. (2005). Levels of ego development and reasoning about counseling in adults. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree master of arts. Dalhousie University.
Harder, D. H., & Zalma, A. (1990). Two promising shame and guilt scales: a construct validity comparison. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3, 4), 729-745.
Harder, D. W., Rockart, L., & Cutler, L. (1993). Additional validity evidence for the Harder personal feelings questionnaire-2 (PFQ2): A measure of shame and guilt proneness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49(3), 345-348.
Hartman, D., & Zimberoff, D. (2008). Higher stages of human development. Journal of Heart-Centered Therapies, 11(2), 3-95.
Hy, L. X., & Loevinger, J. (1996). Measuring ego development (2nd ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kelley, K., Byrne, D., Przybyla, D., Eberly, C., Eberly, B., Greendlinger, V., Wan, C., & Goesky, J. (1985). Chronic self-destructiveness: Conceptualization, measurement, and initial validation of the construct. Motivation and Emotion, 19(2), 135-151.
Leonetti, S. M. (1989). Adults as students: Ego development and the influence of the academic environment. Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership (Ed.D.). Department of Educational Leadership and Policy, Portland State University.
Loevinger, J. (1976). Ego development: Conceptions and theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Loevinger, J. (1979). Construct validity of the sentence completion test of ego development. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3(3), 281-311.
Lorr, M., & Manning, T. T. (1978). Measurement of ego development by sentence completion and personality test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 34(2), 354-361.
Manners, J., & Durkin, K. (2001). A critical review of the validity of ego development theory and its
measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(3), 541-567.
Torbert. W. R. (2014). Brief Comparison of Five Developmental Measures: the GLP, the MAP, the LDP, the SOI, and the WUSCT. Primarily in terms of pragmatic and transformational validity and efficacy. Principal, Action Inquiry Associates, Boston College.
Torbert, W. R., & Livne-Tarandach, R. (2009). Reliability and validity tests of the Harthill leadership development profile in the context of developmental action inquiry theory, practice and method. Integral Review, 5(2), 133-151.
Vidanović, S., & Anđelković, V. (2006). Ego development and the anxiety of gifted adolescents. Philosophy, Sociology and Psychology, 5(1), 87-102.
Wilber, C., Rounsaville, B., & Sugarman, A. (1982). Ego development in opiate addicts: An appli-cation of Loevinger’s stage model. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 170, 202-208.
_||_
