Prioritize the factors affecting the ambiguous marketing

Subject Areas :

reza  arian shakib ¹ (PhD Student, Department of Sports Management, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran)
seyed nemat  khalife ² (Assistant Professor of Sports Management, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran)
mehdi  kohandel ³ (Associate Professor, Department of Sports Management, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran)
mohialdin  bahari ⁴ (Assistant Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran.)

Received: 2022-05-30 Accepted : 2022-08-25 Published : 2022-08-23

Keywords: Structural Equations, sports products, ambiguous marketing,

Abstract :

The aim of this study was to prioritize the effective factors in the marketing of sports products. The present study was a mixed research (qualitative-quantitative). The statistical population in the qualitative section included marketing experts and sports management professors who had articles or writings in the field of research, and in the quantitative section were consumers of sports products. Statistical sample was selected in the qualitative section of 11 experts until the theoretical saturation was reached using theoretical targeted techniques and snowballs. In the quantitative section, between 5 and 10 samples were required for each item, so 308 samples. Formed statistics. The data collection tool was a semi-structured interview in the qualitative part and a researcher-made questionnaire in the quantitative part. The reliability of the interviews was 0.85 by intra-subject agreement study. Content validity in terms of experts and construct validity (exploratory factor analysis) was used. Finally, six factors, namely business ethics, creativity and innovation, citizenship rights, utilitarianism, surprise advertising, and rules and regulations, influence the marketing of sports products. Therefore, novelty and attractive design in advertising, non-social discrimination, attention to citizenship obligations, creating and strengthening social norms, sustainability of advertising, increasing the desire to share advertising in the audience, cultural utilitarianism are suggested.

References:

برهمند، رها؛ باقریان فرح آبادی، محسن (1398). تعیین دیدگاه افراد فعال در حوزه ورزش پیرامون بازاریابی کمینی،کنفرانس بین المللی دستاوردهای نوین پژوهشی در علوم ورزشی و تربیت بدنی در ایران و جهان اسلام،کرج.

رضایی، مونا؛ حمیدی، مهرزاد؛ سجادی، نصراله؛ هنری، حبیب (1394). بررسی شاخص های روانسنجی پرسشنامة بازاریابی تجربی برندهای ورزشی. پژوهش های معاصر در مدیریت ورزشی، 5(9)، 23- 34.

شیراحمد، مرجان و نیک آیین، زینت و تجاری، فرشاد (1394). تحلیل کیفی بازاریابی کمینی در فوتبال ایران،دومین همایش ملی انجمن علمی مدیریت ورزشی ایران، تهران.

عبانی بهار، غلامرضا؛ جماعت، خاطره؛ گودرزی، محمود؛ هنری، حبیب (1396). مدل رفتار مصرفکننده ورزش همگانی بر اساس آمیخته بازاریابی، عوامل محیطی و روانشناختی. پژوهش های معاصر در مدیریت ورزشی، 17(14)، 29-43.

 

Abeza, G., Braunstein-Minkove, J. R., Séguin, B., O’Reilly, N., Kim, A., & Abdourazakou, Y. (2020). Ambush Marketing Via Social Media: The Case of the Three Most Recent Olympic Games. International Journal of Sport Communication, 1(aop), 1-25.

Bruin, W., & Sandberg, V. (2020). Ambush Branding: A reconceptualization of ambush marketing from the ambusher’s perspective.

Chanavat, N., & Martinent, G. (2019). Measuring ambush-marketing and sponsorship effects: a football consumer response approach. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 1-23.

Ciprian-Marcel, P., Lacramioara, R., Ioana, M. A., & Maria, Z. M. (2009). Neuromarketing getting inside the customer’s mind, Annals of Faculty of Economics, 4(1); Pp: 804-807.

Cobbs, J. (2011). Legal battles for sponsorship exclusivity: The cases of the World Cup and NASCAR. Sport Management Review, 14(3), 287-296.

Dašić, D. R., Milojević, N. D., & Pavićević, A. M. (2020). Ethical aspects of guerrilla and ambush marketing. Ekonomski signali: poslovni magazin, 15(2), 49-69.

Devlin, M. Billings, A. C. (8152 ). Examining confirmation biases: implications of sponsor congruency. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, Vol. 51 Issue: 5, pp.52 -12.

Dickson,G, Naylor, M, Phelps,S. (2014). Consumer attitude towards ambush marketing.

Geurin, A. N., & McNary, E. L. (2021). Athletes as ambush marketers? An examination of Rule 40 and athletes’ social media use during the 2016 Rio Olympic Games. European Sport Management Quarterly, 21(1), 116-133.

Herzog, B., & Nufer, G. (2014). Analyzing the effectiveness of ambush marketing with Google search data.

Jakub.(2018). Ambush marketing in sport,8(9),504-517

Johnson, P. (2021). Ambush marketing and brand protection. Oxford University Press.

Lee, D. H. Zhang, Y., Cottingham, M., Park, J. K., Yu, H. Y. (8151 ). Values and goals of Chinese sport consumers contrary to American counterparts. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, Vol. 52 Issue: 5, pp.55 -82.

Nufer, G. (2016). Ambush marketing in sports: an attack on sponsorship or innovative marketing? Sport,Business and Management: An International Journal,Volume 6, Issue 4.15-136.

Pehlivan, E., Berthon, P., Hughes, M. Ü., & Berthon, J. P. (2015). Keeping up with The Joneses: Stealth, secrets, and duplicity in marketing relationships. Business Horizons, 58(6), 591-598.

Priya, R. (2018). Impact of Ambush Marketing on Consumer’s Buying Behaviour–A Study of Snapdeal’s Marketing Strategy RohanGulaty.

Roman, S., & Ruiz, S. (2005). Relationship outcomes of perceived ethical sales behavior: The customer’s perspective. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 439-445.

Sen, S. & Lerman, D. (2007). Why are you telling me this? An examination into nemgative consumer reviiews on the web, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21 (4), pp. 79.

 Onyeagbako, V. (2020). Sports and IP: Commentary on the Legal and Enforcement Framework Against Ambush Marketing for the Tokyo 2021 Olympic Games. Available at SSRN 3668335.