دینامیسم جمعیت پروانه ابریشم باف ناجورLymantria dispar (Lepidoptera : Lymantriidae) دریاسوج
محورهای موضوعی : گیاه پزشکی
1 -
کلید واژه: دینامیسم جمعیت, پروانه ابریشم باف ناجور, یاسوج, Population Dynamics, Gypsy moth, Yasouj,
چکیده مقاله :
طی سالهای 1385 و 1386، مطالعاتی به منظور بررسی تغییرات جمعیت پروانه ابریشم باف ناجور Lymantria dispar L. و میزان وابستگی تراکم آفت در سالهای مذکور نسبت به یکدیگر به منظور تهیه مدلهای جمعیتی آن در منطقه یاسوج انجام گردید. در این مطالعه، با بررسی نمونه های موجود در ده باغ پراکنده در نقاط مختلف منطقه یاسوج، تراکم دسته های تخم زمستان گذران تعیین گردید. میانگین تعداد دسته های تخم زمستان گذران در کل منطقه یاسوج برای سال های 1385 و 1386 در 50 متر مربع 2/0 ± 71/1 و 3/0 ± 88/2 و در یک هکتار به ترتیب 22 ± 342 و 37 ± 576 دسته تخم برآورد گردید. برای سال های مطالعه، منحنی تغییرات تراکم دسته های تخم زمستان گذران رسم شد. نتایج این منحنی ها، نشان دهنده فعالیت آفت با تراکم پایین جمعیت (کمتر از 600 دسته تخم در هکتار) در منطقه یاسوج می باشد. تجزیه رگرسیونی داده های به دست آمده نشان داد که فقط 37/32 درصد واریانس انبوهی دسته های تخم آفت در سال 1386 تحت تاثیر انبوهی آن در سال قبل یعنی 1385 قرار داشته و بیش از 68 درصد واریانس انبوهی تحت تاثیر عوامل ناشناخته دیگری (از قبیل، نوع غذا یا کیفیت غذایی گیاهان میزبان، عوامل آب و هوایی، پارازیتوئیدها، پرداتورها، عوامل بیماریزا و غیره) قرار دارد.
A research was conducted in Yasouj region to determine population dynamics of the gypsy moth in 2006 and 2007. Also it was aimed to calculate the correlation coefficient between the population densities of 2006 and 2007, in order to build a predictive model for the pest. The number of overwintering egg masses was counted during the winter months in ten different orchards. The number of egg masses of the pest was recorded at weekly intervals in ten orchards during the growth seasons in 2006 and 2007. Results indicated that the egg mass densities were 1.71 ± 0.2 and 2.88 ± 0.3 per fifty squares meter and 342 ± 22 and 576 ± 37 egg masses per hectare in winters 2006 and 2007, respectively. Regression analysis of the pest population density in 2006 and 2007 indicated that only 32.37% of the 2007 population variance could be accounted for the population density in 2006. It was obvious that more than 68% of the population changes are under the influence of unknown biotic and abiotic environmental factors.
Abaei, M. 1985. Guide of control major pests and diseases of forest trees and shrubs in Iran. Journal of forestry technical office. Forest and Rangeland organization. Tehran, Iran. 205 pp.
Afshar, J. 1937. Fruit pests in Iran. Journal of agricultural office. Technical branch control of pests. Karaj, Iran.
Barbosa, P. 1978. Host plant exploitation by the gypsy moth, Lymantriadispar. Entomologia Experimentalis ET Applicata, 24 (3): 228-237.
Barbosa, P. & Capinera, L. 1978. Population quality, dispersal and numerical change in the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar L. Oecologia, 36(2):203-209.
Campbell, R.W. 1967. The analysis of numerical change in gypsy moth population. The Canadian Entomologist, 58: 33-45.
Campbell, R.W. & Sloan, R.J. 1976. Influence of behavioral evolution on gypsy moth pupal survival in sparse populations. TheCanadian Entomologist, 120: 426-436.
Diss, A.L., Kunkel, J.C., Montgomery, M.E. & Leonard, D.E. 1996. Effects of maternal nutrition and egg provisioning on parameters of larval hatch, survival and dispersal in the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar L. Oecologia, 106 (4):470-477.
Elkinton, J.S., Liebhold, A.M. & Smith, H.R. 2003. Effects of alternative prey on predation by small mammals on gypsy moth pupae.Population Ecology, 46: 171-178.
Jankovic, L. 1960. Vertical distribution of the gypsy moth and its ecology. Zast. Bilja. 57: 183-209. (Abstr. In: Population dynamics of the gypsy moth: an annotated bibliography. Forest Service General Technical Report NE-48. 1978).
Kansu, I. 1962. The effects of the food on the larvae of the butterflies and moths and an experiment on the gypsy moth larvae. Ankara University. Ziraat fak. Yayin. 2: 116-138 (Abstr. In: Population dynamics of the gypsy moth: an annotated bibliography. Forest Service General Technical Report NE-48. 1978).
Katagiri, K. 1969. Review on microbial control of insect pests in forests in Japan. Entomophaga, 14: 203-214.
Liebhold, A., Elkinton, J., Williams, D. & Muzika, R.M. 2000. What causes outbreaks of the gypsy moth in North America? Biomedical and Life Science Population Ecology. 42 (3):257-266.
Liebhold, A.M., Johnson, D.M. & Bjornstad, O.N. 2006. Geographic variation in density-dependent dynamics impacts the synchronizing effect of dispersal and regional stochasticity. Population Ecology, 48(2): 131-138.
Lindroth, R.L., Hwang, S.Y. & Oiser, T.L. 1999. Phytochemical Variation in Quaking Aspen: Effects on Gypsy Moth Susceptibility to Nuclear Polyhedrosis Virus. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 25(6):1331-1341.
Morris, D.W. 1989. Toward and ecological synthesis: a case for habital selection. Oecologia. 136: 1-13.
Odell, T.M. & Godwin, P.A. 1984. Host selection by Blepharipa pratensis (Meigen), a tachinid parasite of the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar L. Biomedical and Life Science Population Ecology. 10 (2): 311-320.
Orlovskaya, Y.V. 1968. Geographical distribution and manifestation of viral disease in dendrophilous insect pests in the USSR. Entomology Review. 47: 455-463.
Price, P. W. 1984. Insect Ecology. Fourth edition. John Wiley and Sons, London.
Redman, A.M. & Scriber, J.M. 2000. Competition between the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar, and the northern tiger swallowtail, Papilio canadensis: interactions mediated by host plant chemistry, pathogens, and parasitoids. Oecologia, 125(2):218-228.
Reilly, J.R. & Hajek, A.E. 2008. Density-dependent resistance of the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar to its nucleopolyhedrovirus, and the consequences for population dynamics. Oecologia. 154(4):691-701.
Rossiter, M.C. 1991.Environmentally-based maternal effects: a hidden force in insect population dynamics.Oecologia, 87 (2):288-294.
Whitmire, S.L., & Tobin, P.C. 2005. Persistence of invading gypsy moth populations in the United States. Oecologia. 147(2):230-237.
Zhou, G. & Liebhold, M. 1995. Forecasting the spatial dynamics of gypsy moth outbreaks using cellular transition models.Landscape Ecology, 10 (3):177-189.