Comparison of the Microstructure and Mechanical Behavior of the Welding Zone of Aluminum Alloy 5754 by FSW and TIG Methods
Subject Areas :Esmaeil Zarei 1 , Ahmad Afsari 2 , Eshagh Saharkhiz 3 , Seyed Kambiz Ghaemi Osgouie 4
1 - Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
2 - Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
3 - University of Tehran, Kish International Campus, Kish Island, Iran
4 - College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran
Keywords: Al Alloy 5754, Friction Stir Welding, TIG, Microstructure, Mechanical Properties,
Abstract :
In this research, the weld zones resulting from friction stir welding (FSW) and arc welding with shielding gas and non-consumable tungsten electrodes (TIG) on AL-5754 alloy were compared. The input parameters for both processes were selected based on the Taguchi method, and the welding operations were performed accordingly. To achieve optimal input parameters, tensile, ultrasonic, and hardness tests were conducted on the samples. The results indicated that the weld created by the TIG method exhibited higher tensile strength for samples 3, 4, and 9, with values of 195, 152, and 151 MPa, respectively. However, in FSW, the finer granularity of the base material (44 microns) resulted in a better microstructure (30 microns) compared to the TIG method. This characteristic leads to enhanced mechanical properties, such as toughness, fatigue strength, and flexibility, in the FSW method. Since the hard work done on the base metal is lost with this method, and there is no possibility of increasing the strength of the weld, as can be done with the TIG method by changing the filler material, the TIG method is preferred in this comparison.
[1] Manjhi, S.K., Das, A. and Prasad, S.B. 2020. Review on joining of aluminum alloy by solid-state welding technique. Materials Today: Proceedings. 26:1255-1261. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.251.
[2] El-Sayed, M.M., Shash, A.Y., Abd-Rabou, M. and ElSherbiny, M.G. 2021. Welding and processing of metallic materials by using friction stir technique: A review. Journal of Advanced Joining Processes. 3:100059. doi.org/10.1016/j.jajp.2021.100059.
[3] Mishra, R.S. and Ma, Z.Y., 2005. Friction stir welding and processing. Materials science and engineering: R: reports, 50(1-2), pp.1-78. doi:10.1016/j.mser.2005.07.001.
[4] Ahmed, M.M., El-Sayed Seleman, M.M., Fydrych, D. and Çam, G. 2023. Friction stir welding of aluminum in the aerospace industry: the current progress and state-of-the-art review. Materials. 16(8):2971. doi:10.3390/ma16082971.
[5] Masoumi Khalilabad, M., Zedan, Y., Texier, D., Jahazi, M. and Bocher, P. 2022. Effect of heat treatments on microstructural and mechanical characteristics of dissimilar friction stir welded 2198/2024 aluminum alloys. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 36(3):221-239. doi:10.1080/01694243.
[6] Niazi, M., Afsari, A., Behgozin, A. and Nazemosadat, M.R. 2023. Multi-objective optimization of kinematic tool parameters in FSW of Al-7075 and Al-6061 alloys by RSM. Journal of Welding Science and Technology of Iran. 9(1):17-29.
[7] Kumar, K.V. and Balasubramanian, M. 2020. Analyzing the effect of FSW process parameter on mechanical properties for a dissimilar aluminum AA6061 and magnesium AZ31B alloy. Materials Today: Proceedings, 22, pp.2883-2889. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.421.
[8] Woźny, P. and Błachnio, J., 2018. Managing the influence of microstructure defects on the strength of EN AW 5754 aluminium alloy welded joints executed with the TIG method. In MATEC Web of Conferences. 182:02025. EDP Sciences. doi.org/10.1051/matecconf /201718202025.
[9] Park, S.K., Hong, S.T., Park, J.H., Park, K.Y., Kwon, Y.J. and Son, H.J. 2010. Effect of material locations on properties of friction stir welding joints of dissimilar aluminium alloys. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, 15(4):331-336.doi:10.1179/136217110X12714217309696.
[10] Munoz, A.C., Rückert, G., Huneau, B., Sauvage, X. and Marya, S. 2008. Comparison of TIG welded and friction stir welded Al–4.5 Mg–0.26 Sc alloy. Journal of materials processing technology. 197(1-3):337-343. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.035.
[11] Shanavas, S. and Dhas, J.E.R. 2017. Weldability of AA 5052 H32 aluminium alloy by TIG welding and FSW process–a comparative study. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 247(1):012016. IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/247/1/012016.
[12] Liyakat, N.A. and Veeman, D. 2022. Improvement of mechanical and microstructural properties of AA 5052-H32 TIG weldment using friction stir processing approach. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 19:332-344. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.05.015.
[13] Habba, M.I.A., Alsaleh, N.A., Badran, T.E., El-Sayed Seleman, M.M., Ataya, S., El-Nikhaily, A.E., Abdul-Latif, A. and Ahmed, M.M.Z. 2023. Comparative study of FSW, MIG, and TIG welding of AA5083-H111 based on the evaluation of welded joints and economic sspect. Materials. 16:5124. doi: 10.3390/ma16145124.
[14] Grover, H.S., Chawla, V. and Brar, G.S. 2017. Comparing mechanical and corrosion behaviour of TIG & FSW weldments of AA5083-H321. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 10(45):1-8. doi:10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i45/113537.
[15] Barakat, A.A., Darras, B.M., Nazzal, M.A. and Ahmed, A.A. 2022. A comprehensive technical review of the friction stir welding of metal-to-polymer hybrid structures. Polymers. 15(1):220. doi.org/10.3390/polym15010220.
[16] Sharma, A. and Dwivedi, V.K. 2020. Comparison of micro structural and mechanical properties of aluminium alloy AA6062 on FSW and TIGW processes. Materials Today: Proceedings. 25:903-907. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.429.
[17] Isa, M.S.M., Moghadasi, K., Ariffin, M.A., Raja, S., bin Muhamad, M.R., Yusof, F., Jamaludin, M.F., bin Yusoff, N. and bin Ab Karim, M.S. 2021. Recent research progress in friction stir welding of aluminium and copper dissimilar joint: a review. Journal of Materials Research and Technology. 15:2735-2780. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.09.037.
[18] Abbasi, M., Givi, M. and Bagheri, B. 2020. New method to enhance the mechanical characteristics of Al-5052 alloy weldment produced by tungsten inert gas. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 0954405420929777. doi:10.1177/0954405420929777.
[19] Yelamasetti, B., Sridevi, M., Sree, N.S., Geetha, N.K., Bridjesh, P., Shelare, S.D. and Prakash, C. 2024. Comparative studies on Mechanical properties and Microstructural changes of AA5052 and AA6082 dissimilar weldments developed by TIG, MIG, and FSW techniques. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 1-14. doi: 10.1007/s11665-024-09867-9.
[20] Afsari, A., Heidari, S. and Jafari, J. 2020. Evaluation of optimal conditions, microstructure, and mechanical properties of aluminum to copper joints welded by FSW. Journal of Modern Processes in Manufacturing and Production, 9(4):61-81. dor: 20.1001.1.27170314.2020.9.4.6.4.
[21] Blachnio, J., Kulaszka, A., Chalimoniuk, M. and Wozny, P. 2016. Exemplification of tomographic method to evaluate the quality of welded joints made from EN 5754-H22 alloy. Research Works of Air Force Institute of Technology. 39(1):65-78. doi:10.1515/afit-2016-0018.
[22] Durmuş, H. and Çömez, N. 2017. Mechanical properties of AA5754 sheets welded by cold metal transfer method. Technological Applied Sciences, 12(4):170-177. doi:10.12739/NWSA.2017.12.4.2A0124.
[23] Rajeshkumar, R., Niranjani, V.L., Devakumaran, K. and Banerjee, K. 2021. Fusion boundary microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of cold metal transfer welded dissimilar A5754 and A5083 joint. Materials Letters. 284:128877. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2020.128877.
[24] Rabie Zadeh, A. and Afsari, A. 2016. Production of Dispersed Ceramic Nano-Particles in Al Alloy Using Friction Stir Processing. Journal of Modern Processes in Manufacturing and Production. 5(3):41-57.
[25] Eessa, A., Yousif, M. and El-Nikhaily, A. 2015. Effect of tool pin eccentricity on mechanical properties and microstructure of friction stir welded 5754 aluminum alloy. Port-Said Engineering Research Journal. 19(1):108-113. doi: 10.21608/pserj.2015.36789.