بررسی مشارکت‌های اجتماعی رسمی و غیر رسمی زنان در شهر تهران
محورهای موضوعی : زن و جامعه
1 - استادیار گروه جامعه شناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد گرمسار، گرمسار، ایران.
کلید واژه: مشارکت اجتماعی, زنان, مشارکت اجتماعی رسمی, مشارکت اجتماعی غیر رسمی,
چکیده مقاله :
مشارکت اجتماعی دارای دو بعد است: مشارکت رسمی و غیر رسمی. با توجه به تقسیم بندی مشارکت، پرسش اصلی این پژوهش این است که مشارکت‌های رسمی و غیر رسمی زنان شهر تهران چه مقدار است؟ مناطق بیست و دو گانه شهر تهران در مقایسه باهم از چه وضعیتی برخوردارهستند؟ و چه عواملی بر این مشارکت‌ها تاثیرگذار است؟ این پژوهش با روش پیمایش و با استفاده از ابزار پرسش‌نامه انجام گرفت. جامعه آماری، زنان ازدواج کرده (متاهل، مطلقه و همسر فوت شده) ساکن شهر تهران هستند. در این پژوهش 406 نفر از زنان از بین مناطق 22 گانه شهر تهران به روش نمونه گیری تصادفی انتخاب شده اند. نتایج نشان دادند مقدار مشارکت اجتماعی زنان (رسمی، غیر رسمی و مشارکت اجتماعی کلی) پایین و مقدار مشارکت اجتماعی غیر رسمی زنان بیش‌تر از مشارکت رسمی است. زنان مناطق گوناگون تهران از نظر مشارکت اجتماعی باهم متفاوت هستند. بین دو مشارکت رسمی و غیر رسمی رابطه معنادار مستقیم مشاهده شد. هم‌چنین، بین زنان دارای درآمد و فاقد درآمد از نظر مشارکت اجتماعی تفاوت معنادار وجود دارد. بین سن، تحصیلات زنان با مقدار مشارکت آنان رابطه‌ای معنادار مشاهده نشد.
Social participation has two dimensions: the formal and informal participation. According to this division, this study attempts to find out the extent of formal and informal participation of women in Tehran. In addition, it compares the situation of twenty-two regions of Tehran city together and searches effective factors on formal and informal participation of women. The research uses the survey method and the questionnaire technique for data collection. The statistical population of research includes married women (married, divorced and deceased spouse) who are residents of Tehran. Random sampling method helped to select 406 subjects. Results showed that the level of social participation (formal, informal and social participation generally) is low and informal social participation of women is greater than formal participation. There is a significant direct relation between formal and informal participation. Social participation of women with income and without income have significant differences. Social participation of women in different regions of Tehran is different. There was no significant relationship between age, education of women and their participation.
Ahmadnia, Sh. (2001). Some socio-cultural factors of influencing on participation of women. Journal of sociology Association letter, No. 4 (Persian).
- Akbari, N.A. (1996). Obstacles and difficulties women in society. women's message journal, No. 10 (Persian).
-Breton, R. (1997). Social Participation and Social Capital. Introductory Lecture at the Second National Metropolis Conference, 23–25 November, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
- Field, J. (2007). Social capital. Translator Reza Ghaffari. Tehran: kavir publications (Persian).
- Firouz Abadi, A. (2004). Investigation of Social Capital and the factors influencing on its formation in Tehran. PHD thesis in Sociology, unpublished. Faculty of Social Sciences of Tehran University (Persian).
- Finch, j. & Mason, J. (1993). Negotiating family Responsibilites. Tavistock Routledge, London.
- Fatemi, A. (2005). Explanation of the social participation of women, before and after the Islamic Revolution of Iran from 1953 to 2001. Tehran: Publication Rooz(Persian).
- Fakhraei, C. (1997). Sociology of cultural barriers of social participation of women in Iran. Tehran: Institute of Basic Research of Al-Zahra University. pp. 81-92 (Persian).
- Ghaneirad, M. A. & Hosseini, F. (2005). value of a network of relationships, and participation in non-governmental organizations: an empirical study among young people in Tehran. Sociology of Iran 6 (3).pp 97-123(Persian).
-Helly, D. (2001). Voluntary and social participation by peple of Immigrant origin. overview of Canadian Research, second National Metropolis conference, Immigrant and civic participation: Contermporary policy and Research Issues. Montreal, November 1997.
- Lipset , S. M. (2001). political man: the social bases of politics. Newyork Anchor Book.
- Mohsen Tabrizi, A.R. (1990). Study of participation basis of villagers and their relationship with agricultural extension. Published by Jehade Daneshgahi, promosion assistance and public participation (Persian).
- Mohseni, M., & Jarollahi, O. (2003). Social Participation in Iran. Tehran: Publication of Aaron(Persian).
-Pirahari, N. (2011). Social trust of women . quarterly professional journal of sociology. Vol.7. No.1 (Persian)
- Putnam, R. (1996). The strange disappearance of civic America. policy, Autumn ,pp.3-15
- Putnam, R.D. (1998). Foreword, Housing policy Debate. Vol. 9.No.1
- Putnam, R. (2000). Democracy and civic traditions. Translated by Mohammad Taghi delafroz, Tehran: Salam publications (Persian).
- Share Pour, M. (2001). Erosion of social capital and its implications. Jornal of social science letter . No.3 (Persian).
- Stone, W. (2001). Measuring social capital. Research paper No. 24. Australian Institute of Family studies.
- Saboktakin Rizi, Gh. (1994). Explanation of relationship between the level of education of rural women and their social participation. Master's thesis in Sociology, , Tehran, Tarbiat Modarres University(Persian).
-Torres, A. Del Rosaria, R. (1996). Gender and Development. Translator Javad Youssefian. Tehran: Banoo publications (Persian).
-Van Groenou, M. B., & Deeg, H. D. (2010). Formal and informal social participation of the ‘young-old’ in The Netherlands in 1992 and 2002. Ageing & Society, 30 (3), 445 – 465.
-World Bank. (2003). Social capital and Gender. www. http: //go. worldbank. org
- Woolcoke. (2003). Diversity as oppoutunity and challenge: the role of social capital theory, evidence and policy. presentation to the policy Research Initiative conference, Monereal.
_||_