بررسی ارتباط بین دینداری و گرایش به رفتارهای متکدیانه در بین زنان شهر شیراز
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه زن و جامعهعلیرضا نظری 1 , غلامرضا جعفری نیا 2 , حبیب پاسالار 3
1 - دکتری جامعه شناسی، گروه جامعه شناسی، واحد بوشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ،بوشهر،ایران
2 - دانشیار گروه جامعه شناسی، واحد بوشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ،بوشهر،ایران
3 - استادیار گروه جامعه شناسی، واحد بوشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بوشهر، ایران
کلید واژه: دینداری, تکدی گری, رفتارهای متکدیانه, آسیب اجتماعی زنان,
چکیده مقاله :
تکدی گری یکی از آسیب های اجتماعی است که در بروز و ترویج بسیاری از مسائل دیگر موثر است و این امر در جامعه می تواند در بروز و افزایش اعتیاد، حمل مواد مخدر، شیوع بیماری های پر خطر، سرقت، فحشا و سایر بزه های اجتماعی تاثیرگذار باشد. با توجه به اهمیت بحث از تکدی گری، پژوهش حاضر با استفاده از روش میدانی، تکنیک پیمایش و ابزار تحقیق پرسشنامه به دنبال پاسخ به این سؤال اصلی می باشد که آیا بین بین دینداری با گرایش به رفتارهای متکدیانه زنان در شهر شیراز ارتباط وجود دارد؟ جامعه آماری پژوهش حاضر تمامی زنان و دختران متکدی و شبه متکدی ۱۲ سال به بالای شهر شیراز می باشد که تعداد ۳۸۴ نفر از آنها به عنوان حجم نمونه مورد بررسی قرار گرفته و برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها از نرم افزارهای SPSS و معادلات ساختاری AMOS Graphic استفاده شده است.
نتایج تحقیق حاکی از آن است که بین دینداری (۳۶/۰P= ) و شاخص های آن یعنی بعد اعتقادی (۲۶/۰P= )، بعد پیامدی (۳۳/۰-P= )، بعد مناسکی (۴۲/۰-P= )، بعد تجربی (۳۶/۰-P= ) و بعد عاطفی (۳۷/۰-P= )، با گرایش به رفتارهای متکدیانه زنان ارتباط منفی و معکوس و معنادار وجود دارد. بنابراین تمامی فرضیه های پژوهش تأیید می شوند. همچنین نتایج حاصل از مدل معادله ساختاری (AMOS) نیز نشان می دهد که دینداری بر گرایش به رفتارهای متکدیانه تأثیر منفی و متوسط (۴۲/۰-) دارد.
Tackling is one of the social damages that affects and promotes many other issues in the community and can increase the incidence of addiction, drug trafficking, high-risk outbreaks, theft, prostitution and other social crimes. be influential. Regarding the importance of discussing takedowns, the present study seeks to answer the main question of whether there is a relationship between religiosity and tendency to addictive behaviors in Shiraz using field method, survey technique and questionnaire research tool. The statistical population of this research is all the ancients and pseudo-ancients over 12 years old in Shiraz city. 384 of them were studied as sample size.
The results showed that between religiosity (P = 0.36) and its indicators, namely belief (P = 0.26), consequential dimension (P = 0.33), ritual dimension (P = 0.42). There was a negative and significant relationship between tendency to addictive behaviors, empirical dimension (P = 0.36) and emotional dimension (P = 0.37). Therefore, all the research hypotheses are confirmed. The results of structural equation modeling (AMOS) also show that religiosity has a negative and moderate (-0.42) tendency to the behavioral behavior.
1- Rajabi S, Ali Moradi K. Investigating the phenomenon of takadarism and its relation to poverty in Bushehr Province. In: International Conference on Psychology and Culture of Life. Istanbul; 2016. p. 20–39.
2- Tajik M, Miri Ashtiani E. Introduction to the Pathology of Social Issues in Iran. Tehran: The Culture of Discourse; 2004.
3- Shakoori A, Motamedi H. Analysis of Socio-Economic Factors Affecting Begging In the City of Mashhad. socio-cultural Dev Stud. 2013;1(3).
4- Kulayni M ibn Y. Usul al-Kafi. Ustad Vali H, translator. Qom: Dar Al-Thaqalin ;1390.
5- Ghayedgiwi F, Jahanshahi R, Niksirat M. Assessing the Relationship between Social Capital and Different Dimensions of Religion Among Youth (Case Study: Yasuj Youth). In: First International Conference on Humanities, Cultural and Social Studies. Shiraz; 2018.
6- Pyszczynski T, Greenberg J, Solomon S, Hamilton J. A terror management analysis of self-awareness and anxiety: The hierarchy of terror. Anxiety Res. 1990;2(3):177–95.
7- Hamilton M. Sociology of Religion. Salasi M, translator. Tehran: Tebian; 2011.
8- Ritzer G. Contemporary Sociology Theories. Salasi M, translator. Tehran: Scientific Publications; 2005.
9- Freund J: Identify Max Weber. Nik Gohar A, translator. Tehran: Tootia; 1997.
10- Lenski G. The Religious Factor: A Sociological Study of Religion's Impact on Politics, Economics and Family Life. Lieber T, editor. Tradit A J Orthodox Jewish Thought. 1963;6(1):110–113.
11- Glock CY, Stark R. Religion and society in tension: a publi. from the research program in the Sociology of Religion Survey Research Center, Univ. of Calif., Berkeley; 1970.
12- Hedarkhani H, Norbakhsh Y, Ghsnbari N. The Relationship between Religiosity and Social Health of Young People in Marginal areas of Kermanshah. Soc Dev Welf Palnning. 2018;9(30):31–66.
13- Ahmadi H. Sociology of Deviations. Tehran: SAMT Publications; 2016.
14- Salimi A, Davari M. sociology of deviance. Qom: Research Institute of Hawzeh and University; 2017.
15- Coser L, Rosenberg B. Fundamental sociological theories. Ershad F,translator. Tehran: Ney Publishing; 2009.
16- Mohseni Tabrizi A. Vandalism. Tehran: Agah Publishing; 2005.
17- Sedaghat K. Investigating the Role of Cultural-Social Factors Affecting the Legislation and Legislation of the Citizens of Tabriz. PhD dissertation. Isfahan: University of Esfahan; 2006.
18- Gasan R. Introduction to Criminology. Keynia M, translator. Tehran: Majd Publishing; 2012.
19- Alivardinia A, Riahi M, Mousavi Chashmi M. Sociological study of delinquency: Agnio’s general pressure theory experimental test. Iran J Sociol. 2006;8(2):75–99.
20- Hergenhan B., Olson M. Introduction to learning theories. Seyf AK, translator. Tehran: Dooran; 2010.
21- Parsa M. New field of psychology. Tehran: Besat Publishing; 2004.
22- Cohen B. Introduction to Sociology. Salasi M, translator. Tehran: Tootia Publishing; 2007.
23- Cantillon D, Davidson WS, Schweitzer JH. Measuring community social organization: Sense of community as a mediator in social disorganization theory. J Crim Justice. 2003;31(4):321–39.
24- Nazaktabar H, Zahedi MJ, Nayebi H. Religiosity in Preventing the Deliquency of Tehranian Juvenile. Refahj. 2006;6(22):233–60.
25- Moeini M, Jahanbazian S. Investigating the effective factors on begging in Yasuj city. Appl Stud Soc Sci Sociol. 2020;2(1):23–34.
26- Abdollahi E, Zandi R. Investigation and analysis of factors affecting begging in Bushehr. In: Third World Conference on Psychology and Educational Sciences, Law and Social Sciences at the Beginning of the Third Millennium. Shiraz; 2016.
27- Turki S. Sociological study of factors affecting begging in Kerman. In: Second National Conference on New Research in the Fields of Humanities and Social Studies in Iran. Qom, Soroush Hekmat Mortazavi Center for Islamic Studies and Research; 2017.
28- Barzegar Z, Poornajaf H, Javadifar S, Moslehpour F. Beggars’ experiences of begging and ways to reduce and treat it in society. In: International Conference on Management Economics and Social Sciences. Tehran; 2016.
29- Jahangiri M, Soltani I, Karimi Y. Explaining the social factors affecting the desire of begging women to stop begging. In: the first conference on the role of women in the health of society. Tehran; 2015.
30- Kassah AK. Begging as work: a study of people with mobility difficulties in Accra, Ghana. Disabil & Soc [Internet]. 2008;23(2):163–70.
31- Woubishet D. Begging as a means of livelihood: conferring with the poor at the orthodox religious ceremonial days in addis ababa. African study Monogr Suppl issue. 2005;(29):185–91.
32- Portes A, Rumbaut RG. Introduction: The Second Generation and the Children of Immigrants Longitudinal Study. Ethn Racial Stud [Internet]. 2005;28(6):983–99.
33- Bromley R. Begging in Cali: Image, Reality and Policy. Int Soc Work. 1981;24(2):22–40.
34- Dehkhoda ali akbar. The Dehkhoda Dictionary of Two Volumes. Tehran: University of Tehran; 2006.
_||_