تحلیل عوامل مؤثر در تغییر سبک زندگی مسکونی در قلمرو جغرافیای رفتاری و ساختاری کلان شهر تبریز

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی برنامه ریزی منطقه ای

شهریور روستایی ¹ , مینا فرخی صومعه ² , رسول قربانی ³

1 - دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران
2 - دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران
3 - استاد گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1398/02/30 تاریخ پذیرش : 1398/07/26 تاریخ انتشار : 1399/08/01

کلید واژه: مدل معادلات ساختاری, کلان‌شهر تبریز, سبک زندگی مسکونی, جغرافیای رفتاری, جغرافیای ساختاری,

چکیده مقاله :

         سبک زندگی مسکونی خانوارها در گذار از مرحله سنتی به مدرن دگرگون شده و بشر سبک‌های مسکونی جدیدی را تجربه می‌کند. امروزه مساکن شهری در معرض بزرگ­ترین تغییرات سبک زندگی قرار گرفته‌اند. تغییراتی که فرصت جامعه‌پذیری، انتخاب، پایداری زیستی– محیطی و انطباق با ویژگی‌های کالبدی را فراهم نمی‌سازد. تغییر در سبک زندگی مسکونی در ساختار کلان‌شهر تبریز منجر به دگرگونی در الگوی سکونت شهری شده و باعث به وجود آمدن مساکنی متفاوت از گذشته شده و مسکن تبدیل به کالایی برای نمود تمایز طبقاتی بین خانوارها و الگویی کاملاً سودمحور و نفع طلبانه به خود گرفته است. پژوهش حاضر درصدد است با رویکرد جغرافیای رفتاری و ساختاری به شناسایی و تحلیل عوامل مؤثر در تغییر سبک زندگی مسکونی در کلان‌شهر تبریز بپردازد. نوع تحقیق کاربردی، روش تحقیق توصیفی- تحلیلی بوده و در روش گردآوری اطلاعات از مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای و میدانی با ابزار پرسشنامه استفاده شده است. تعداد پرسشنامه یا حجم نمونه برابر 384 خانوار بوده است. در پژوهش حاضر، در تعیین مؤلفه‌های سبک زندگی مسکونی از تحلیل عاملی و نرم‌افزار ₂₂ SPSS  استفاده شده است. روایی پرسشنامه بر اساس اعتبار صوری و پایایی آن با ضریب آلفای کرونباخ، 89/0 به دست آمده است. تجزیه ‌و تحلیل در این پژوهش مبتنی بر روش الگویابی معادلات ساختاری با استفاده از نرم‌افزار لیزرل بوده است. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که، عامل اقتصادی با حدود 83/0 بیشترین اثرگذاری را در ساکنین به ‌عنوان عامل فعال تصمیم‌گیرنده برای سبک زندگی مسکونی و تغییر آن دارد. همچنین در ارزیابی نیکویی برازش مدل عوامل رفاهی، محیطی، اقتصادی و اجتماعی با تغییر در سبک زندگی مسکونی رابطه مثبت و معنادار دارد. در نهایت، شکل‌گیری جامعه مصرفی، ترجیح اصل سود و ایجاد جامعه مبادله‌ای به همراه فضاهای طبیعی مصنوع عمده‌ترین اثرات تغییر سبک زندگی مسکونی ‌است.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The residential lifestyle has changed from traditional to modern, and people experience to new residential styles. Today, urban housing is subject to the greatest changes in life. A change that makes it possible for socialization, choice, bio-environmental sustainability and adaptation to intrinsic qualities. The change in residential lifestyle in the Tabriz Metropolitan area has led to a change in the urban pattern, causing different issues from the past to be different, and housing becomes a commodity to distinguish between classifications among families and patterns that are quite profitable and beneficial. The present study explores to identify and analyze the factors affecting the changing of residential lifestyle in a Tabriz metropolitan area with a structural and behavioral geographic approach. The type of applied research is a descriptive-analytic research method. In the method of data collection, library and field studies have been used with the questionnaire tool. The number of questionnaires or sample size was 384 households. In the present study, factor analysis and SPSS ₂₂ software were used to determine the variables of residential lifestyle. Similarly, the validity of the questionnaire was examined based on formal validity and its reliability with Cronbach's alpha coefficients was 0.89. The analysis of this research, which was based on SEM, was considered using LISREL software. The results of the research showed that the economic factor of about 0.83 had the most effect on residents as the active factor of decision-making for residential style and its change. Also, in evaluating the goodness of fit, the model of welfare, environmental, economic and social factors have a positive and significant relationship with changes in residential lifestyle. Finally, the formation of a consumer society, the main advantage of profit and the creation of an exchange society, along with synthetic natural spaces, is the most important effect of changing the residential lifestyle. Extended Abstract Introduction:       The residential lifestyle of households has been transformed from the traditional to the modern, with people experiencing new housing styles. Today, urban housing has been subject to the greatest lifestyle changes. Changes that do not provide the opportunity for socialization, choice, bio-environmental sustainability and adaptation to physical characteristics. The change in the residential lifestyle in the Tabriz metropolitan structure has led to a change in the pattern of urban living and has created housing different from the past, and housing has become a commodity to reflect the class distinction between households and a completely self-centered and profitable model. The present study seeks to identify and analyze the factors affecting the change of residential lifestyle in Tabriz metropolitan area through behavioral and structural geography approach. Methodology:        The present research is applied in terms purpose and is descriptive - analytic in terms method.Statistical Society of this study is households residing in Tabriz metropolis in 2018. Data pertinent on theoretical foundations of research is prepared to method of libraries and documentary and raw data of the research is extracted from a questionnaire with a sample size of 384 households. In this study, factor analysis and SPSS ₂₂ software were used to determine the components of residential lifestyle. The validity of the questionnaire was 0.89 based on its face validity and its reliability with Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The analysis in this study was based on Structural Equation Modeling using LISREL software. The results showed that the economic factor with about 0.83 had the most impact on the residents as the active decision-making factor for the residential lifestyle and its change. Also, there is a positive and significant relationship between goodness of fit, environmental, economic and social factors with changes in residential lifestyle. Ultimately, the formation of the consumer community, the preference for profit, and the creation of an exchange society with the natural spaces of the artifact are the major effects of changing the way of living. Results:        The results indicate that the economic factor with about 0.83 has the most impact on the residents as the active decision-maker for the residential lifestyle and its change. Also, there is a positive and significant relationship between goodness of fit, environmental, economic and social factors with changes in residential lifestyle. Finally, the formation of the consumer community, the preference for profit, and the creation of an exchange society with natural spaces of artifacts are the major effects of changing the way of living. Conclusion:        herefore, it can be said that the more economic factors in the choice of housing and the choice of housing, the higher the rate of change in residential lifestyle towards economics. Economically based residential lifestyle in Tabriz metropolis has created a way for households to move away from the natural environment, forming individualistic exchange societies, neglecting housing preferences, forming artificial spaces without regard to household needs and preferences. . In individualism, human dominance over natural resources for wealth production is the basis of work, and it is this structure that provides the basis for the formation of housing differentiation and commercialization of housing; Demographic, household priorities and expectations to reinforce social and environmental styles in residential life can be effective in the construction and development of housing with amenities, high utility, collectivism, and reduced individual focus.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Abarshi, A. and S.Y. Hosseini, (2012). Modeling Structural Equations, Sociology Publications, First Edition, Tehran. (in Persian)


2. Akhvandi, M (2012). Investigating Social Factors Affecting Lifestyle (Case Study: Women 18-65 years old, Tehran), MSc Thesis, Supervisor: Dr. Khadijeh Safiri, Department: Women's Studies and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics. (in Persian)


3. Al-Homoud, M. (2009). Privacy Control as a Function of Personal Space in Single-Family Homes in Jordan, Journal of Design and Built Environment, 5(1), pp: 31-48. (In English)


4. Aragones, J. I. (2002). The dwelling as place: behaviors and symbolism. Residential environments, Choice, satisfaction, and behavior, 163-182. (In English)


5. Arbabi, A.M (2000). From Production to Consumption, Marketing, Farvardin Publications, Tehran. (in Persian)


6. Badsar, M. Fathi S. Rezaei, R. and H. Shabanali Femi, (2019). The Role of the Media in the Rural Life Style Developments (Case Study: Zanjan County), Journal of Regional Planning, Volume 6, Number 24, Pages 166- 153. (in Persian)


7. Beamish, J. O., Carucci Goss, R., & Emmel, J. (2001). Lifestyle influences on housing preferences, Housing and Society, 28(1-2), 1-28. (In English)


8. Behafrouz, F (1991). Investigations of Environmental Perception and Behavior in Contemporary Geographic and Human Geography Studies, Journal of Geographical Research, Volume 6, Number 1 (20), pp. 70-31. (in Persian)


9. Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2012). Sustainability indicators: measuring the immeasurable?, Routledge. (In English)


10. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures, Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588. (In English)


11. Dale, V. H., & Beyeler, S. C. (2001). Challenges in the development and use of ecological indicators, Ecological indicators, 1(1), 3-10. (In English)


12. Dutta-Bergman, M. J., & Wells, W. D. (2002). The values and lifestyles of idiocentrics and allocentrics in an individualist culture: A descriptive approach, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 231-242. (In English)


13. East Azarbaijan Planning and Budget Organization, 2016. (in Persian)


14. Femi, A. B., & Khan, T. H. (2014). Bridging the gap between housing demand and housing supply in Nigerian urban centres: A review of government intervention so far, British journal of arts and social sciences, 18(2), 94-107. (In English)


15. Ge, J., & Hokao, K. (2006). Research on residential lifestyles in Japanese cities from the viewpoints of residential preference, residential choice and residential satisfaction, Landscape and urban planning, 78(3), 165-178. (In English)


16. Hamzeh, F (2009). From Behaviorism to Behavioral Geography, Journal of Geography, Volume 3, Number 8-9, pp. 97-71. (in Persian)


17. Hekmatnia, H. and M.N. Mousavi, (2013). Model Application in Geography with Emphasis on Urban and Regional Planning, Third Edition, Azadpima Press, Tehran. (in Persian)


18. Jansen, S. J., Coolen, H. C., & Goetgeluk, R. W. (Eds.). (2011). The measurement and analysis of housing preference and choice, Springer Science & Business Media. (In English)


19. Jayasree, K. (2011). Lifestyle–A Tool for Understanding Buyer Behavior, International Journal of Economics and Management, 5(1), 283-298. (In English)


20. Junaidi A.B. and Rosmadi, F. and S.G. Amer, (2012). Penilaian awal impak perlaksanaan Dasar Perumahan Negara terhadap sector perumahan di Kuala Lumpur. Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space 8 (6), pp: 90-108. (In English)


21. Kavianirad, M. and S. Abbaspor gomari, (2015). The Influence of Place and Time on the Environmental Perception of Contemporary Shiite and Sunni Movements in the Middle East, Strategic Policy Research Quarterly, Volume 12, Number 12 (42), pp. 138-116. (in Persian)


22. Lawrence, R. J. (1989). Constancy and change in household demography, dwelling designs and home life: The case of Geneva, Housing Studies, 4(1), 36-43. (In English)


23. Lee, H. J., Carucci Goss, R., & Beamish, J. O. (2007). Influence of lifestyle on housing preferences of multifamily housing residents, Housing and Society, 34(1), 11-30. (In English)


24. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses, Psychological methods, 7(1), 64. (In English)


25. Mohammadi, F. Haghighatian, M. and A. Mohammadi, (1979). Factors Affecting the Social Interactions of Residents of Apartment-dwellers (Case Study: Shiraz City), Quarterly Journal of Urban Research and Planning, Volume 9, Number 35, pp. 56 -47. (in Persian)


26. Plummer, J. T. (1974). The Concept and Application of Life Style Segmentation: The Combination of two Useful Concepts Provides a Unique and Important View of the Market, Journal of marketing, 38(1), 33-37. (In English)


27. Shatarian, M. Ashnoui, A. and M. Ganjiipour, (2012). Measuring the Satisfaction of Aran and Bidgol Old Town People with Quality of Life Indicators, Urban and Regional Studies and Research, 4 (13), pp. 144- 127. (in Persian)


28. Solomon, M. R., & Panda, T. K. (2011). Consumer behavior, buying, having, and being. Pearson Education India, 10th Edition, Prentice Hall, PTR (In English)


29. Solomon, R. M., Bamossy, G., Askegaard, S., & Hogg, M. K. (2006). Customer behavior, A European Perspective, Prentice-Hall, Englewood cliffs, NJ. (In English)


30. Yaghoubi, M., Qureshi Minaabad, M.B., Molai Hashjin, N (2016). Investigating the Role of Tourism in Changing Housing Patterns in Rural Areas (Case Study: Razvanshahr City), Journal of Regional Planning, Volume 6, Issue 24 , Pp. 188-179. (in Persian)